• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Asylum Mafia - zomggggg who won zomggggg

rPSIvysaur

[ɑɹsaɪ]
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
16,415
I wanted a lynch over no lynch. I just had to vote vi since he was the play of the day though.
 

¯\_S.(ツ).L.I.D._/¯

Smash Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
12,115
Location
Chicago, IL
So I wanted to look a little more into Smoth, who pretty much coasted D1.

Right now I'm thinking Lythium doesn't look scummy enough/have enough evidence against her to keep my vote on her.

Unvote; Vote V

I see why V would be a good lynch but I have other people in mind ATM. Only voting V for lack of a solid conclusion of my other thoughts.
It'd be nice to see evidence for Vi, or your other candidates. The fact that you voted Vi because you didn't have information on your "other suspects" doesn't sit well with me. Voting for someone with no reasoning is a good way to look like scum.

My reasons for voting V... not really any good reason I just get a bad feeling from him. Like I said, I have other suspicions that I'm still looking into. I don't feel it's necessary to share incomplete thoughts.
K so this posts makes you look even worse. You admit to not having a good reason to vote Vi, other than a bad feeling.

Well if you still have these suspicions it'd be nice to see them. At this point it seems like you're just saying this to put off posting anything of substance.

I'd like an explanation from you.



Alright, here are my thoughts on the game in general:

We kind of got screwed D1/N1, but I think we can bounce back if we play smart. We need a Mafia lynch (or a no lynch) in order to stay in the game. The good thing is that Vi was not a paranoid (or cop), so we still have both of those out there (and cop). We need to try very hard to avoid killing them, because they're our only chance at killing/finding scum at night.

Today we have to play smart. If we don't have enough information, we can't risk a lynch. We have to be sure.

Personally, I think Vi didn't play too great this game. He gave up at the end (I know I would have potentially swayed my vote had he fought our accusations with evidence) and played like an anti-town. That's behind us though, and we got some decent info from it I guess.

So yeah, I guess those are my thoughts for now. If I think of anything else I'll post it of course.
 

¯\_S.(ツ).L.I.D._/¯

Smash Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
12,115
Location
Chicago, IL
I wanted a lynch over no lynch. I just had to vote vi since he was the play of the day though.
Wait can you explain this to me? You voted Vi because he was who was being voted for the most? Please tell me what you meant by this, because it seems to me that this post says "I voted Vi because everyone else does." That's essentially as anti-town as you can get.
 

¯\_S.(ツ).L.I.D._/¯

Smash Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
12,115
Location
Chicago, IL
Let me rephrase that. Neither is voting without evidence, especially when not sure about voting. You just basically said that you had to vote Vi because everyone else did. Please explain to me how this helps town at all.
 

ohaiduhg

Smash Lord
Joined
Nov 28, 2008
Messages
1,569
Location
Llano, CA
We are down to 5/3.

That quick.

****ing **** D:
This is why I unvoted V because I wanted to go no lynch for D1. Odds were a townie would be lynched and then there would be a NK of another townie more than likely. Now mafia has more influence in the votes.
 

¯\_S.(ツ).L.I.D._/¯

Smash Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
12,115
Location
Chicago, IL
So you're blaming me for killing someone who could have ended up being scum?
No, just pointing out that going with the crowd while voting really isn't a good idea, and makes me think that maybe you're not town aligned. If Mafia are the ones guiding the lynch (which makes sense considering Vi was town) then being influenced by them really isn't a good idea.
 

DZLE

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
4,955
Location
Planar Fields
I have no suspicions right now.

Let me read a bit.

You wanna hear why I voted Vi?

Read yesterday. you'll get the answer
 

¯\_S.(ツ).L.I.D._/¯

Smash Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
12,115
Location
Chicago, IL
Have you played Mafia before?
You don't no lynch.
Have you played Mafia before? No lynches happen pretty frequently, what are you talking about.

I have no suspicions right now.

Let me read a bit.

You wanna hear why I voted Vi?

Read yesterday. you'll get the answer
What do you think we should do today/the rest of the game? I'd like it if people would answer the full question.
 

DZLE

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
4,955
Location
Planar Fields
Vrael,
Today we scum hunt. Ask more questions, get more (flawed) answers.

Pick apart posts.
See if we can get something, anything. We can't no Lynch at this point. In MY honest opinion. A no lynch may have been acceptable day 1. But we can't turn back time.
Well...
If we no lynch today, another town dies, leaving it at 4/3.
If we lynch, and hit mafia, 4/2. (THIS IS NOT COUNTING A PARANOID GETTING HIT)
If we lynch and hit town, 3/3 >.>

What is everyones thought on this? I think a Lynch Could Be In Order.
Best case scenario: We lynch, hit mafia. Mafia kill hits paranoid.

Bam.

Thoughts ppl?
 

Jim Morrison

Smash Authority
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
15,287
Location
The Netherlands
rPSI, I saw your vote yesterday, I didn't take it serious since your case was so horrendous.

1. You defend inactives. Why would you want them in late-game, seriously?
"Johning" about inactives IS serious, you can't just let them slip, even if this is DR.

2. You keep pointing out I make useless posts. Well duh, I have 82 posts, there's bound to be a few posts with little content. During those 6 hours I didn't feel like posting ****, you pick every post I made, call it useless and say OH I HAVE A CASE. Any posts you called useless outside that time, was me agreeing with other people, therefor OH ADDING NOTHING. You don't have to add something new every post, just look at cases, and ask questions. I keep feeling the urge to pick every post you made and call it useless now as well, can I?
Next you call me out on controlling the day. Are you ********, do you even READ the posts made before that, or do you just pick mine out? Roxy asked me how I'd want the day to go. I let him. Notice how I even put "but who am I to control a day :urg:" after it. Seriously stop making me look bad for **** that's not there.

3. Then you call me a hypocrite, but I don't see the correlation between this:
Later it will cost us much, much more to get them lynched. We don't an unlimited amount of them.
I'm not getting a read on him enough to want him lynched, but if tomorrow no one has bothered to vote for inactives, I have no other choice but go for the play of the day. I'm not going for a No Lynch.
and this
I really hate when people use this as an excuse.
To me it seems as if you have no ****ing clue on what to say, so instead you use this to make it seem like you have something, while in reality, you probably don't.
We're never gonna get a good lynch if you don't express your thoughts.
4. You were first against a hypocop, I'm fairly sure that you know what a hypocop is. What did you think it was before someone explained it again so you could understand it.
 

Jim Morrison

Smash Authority
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
15,287
Location
The Netherlands
rPSI, you seem VERY eager to lynch. I think you want us to hit a townie, because following DZLE's logic, if we lynch a townie now, there's a big chance we lose.
Your reasoning to vote Vi was one of the worst, you didn't even quote anything someone else said and say "I agree, that DOES make him look scummy." You lynched solely for the sake of lynching, even if you don't have your suspicions towards him.
No need to defend you for this, because it's oh, so hard, but I'll just note this.

Why I voted V? Read before the deadline I made a big post on why I found him suspicious.
 

Shadow Moth

Up in the clouds
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
6,672
Location
Hyrule
no lynch is never good for town
No lynch can be good for the town when we're at mylo.
It gives us more time to investigate without the possibility of lynching our way to defeat.
We're not quite there yet but if we mislynch and the mafia don't NK a paranoid then we're probably finished.


Vrael,
Today we scum hunt. Ask more questions, get more (flawed) answers.

If we no lynch today, another town dies, leaving it at 4/3.
If we lynch, and hit mafia, 4/2. (THIS IS NOT COUNTING A PARANOID GETTING HIT)
If we lynch and hit town, 3/3 >.>

What is everyones thought on this? I think a Lynch Could Be In Order.
Best case scenario: We lynch, hit mafia. Mafia kill hits paranoid.

Bam.

Thoughts ppl?
If we lynch and hit mafia (especially the attentive killer) we have a much better chance of winning this. However no lynch seems much safer at this point.

I think it is a good idea to lynch, however we shouldn't lynch unless we're really sure the person we're lynching is scum. We can wait at least one more day if we have to.


rPSI, you seem VERY eager to lynch. I think you want us to hit a townie, because following DZLE's logic, if we lynch a townie now, there's a big chance we lose.
Your reasoning to vote Vi was one of the worst, you didn't even quote anything someone else said and say "I agree, that DOES make him look scummy." You lynched solely for the sake of lynching, even if you don't have your suspicions towards him.
No need to defend you for this, because it's oh, so hard, but I'll just note this.

I agree with this. Lynching a townie at this point will mean almost certain defeat.

Again, if we lynch we have to be absolutely sure of it. If anyone at all is unsure of the person being scum I feel it's best to hold off.
 

rPSIvysaur

[ɑɹsaɪ]
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
16,415
So you guys have just hounded me on "voting for no reason". Then you guys hound me for voting based on my suspicions.

Nice...
 

¯\_S.(ツ).L.I.D._/¯

Smash Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
12,115
Location
Chicago, IL
Just wanted to say that if we lynch a townie who is not a paranoid, there's a 50% chance that scum NKs a paranoid. So we have a 50% of going to D3 if we lynch a townie. That isn't a chance I want to take, let's slow down here and not make any rash decisions.

These days are pretty short, which benefits scum coasting. We've got to try to get as much information as possible, and I agree with Guus that we need to make sure everyone is being active. Yesterday I know I criticized him for it, but I realize how dangerous it can be.



Unrelated, but I share Guus's question for rPSI in the above post.
 

Jim Morrison

Smash Authority
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
15,287
Location
The Netherlands
Obviously I'm going to "hound you" (as you would call it) when you vote me.
What Vrael said wasn't towards your current suspicion, it was for your BS reasons to vote V. Which is also why I'm voting you.
 

Jim Morrison

Smash Authority
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
15,287
Location
The Netherlands
1.
OMGUS usually takes place during RVS. People are allowed to defend themselves with a vote if they think the vote was scummy.
2. I don't vote you because you voted me, I vote because your actions are scummy. You vote TPK for the sake of getting a lynch, now today you're extremely pushy for a lynch, then contradict your own statement. If I called someone out on RVS "they usually take place in RVS", but when you do it, it's warranted? Nuh uh.
 
Top Bottom