Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Its ok man, you can go to Stuff Yer Face stromboli. Its not as greasy but it tastes way better anyway
even Pokemon?all games are using bracket pools
What's the situation for getting more group rate rooms looking like?
Did you know that generating fair pools for "Bracket pools" with a seeded list of all players, is LITERALLY the SAME thing as having ONE large BRACKET. So please stop calling it bracket pools. It's just one bracket.all games are using bracket pools
um well according to thisSo, did you know that when you try to bring up a moot point about the naming of how pools are run and try to come off as a smartass, you're likely to get got if you don't have your facts straight? Well, now you do
src: http://smashboards.com/threads/apex-2014-january-17-19-2013-somerset-nj.338965/page-13#post-16012848not this year. You start the final bracket in losers if you get second in your pool. Like evo. It's essentially one big bracket split into smaller brackets for organizational purposes.
Even if it is just one big bracket, it's actually a bit misleading to communicate "one big bracket" to attendees, because that doesn't indicate when you stop playing on Day 1. I like the "bracket pool" terminology because it indicates a clear cutoff from the initial stage of the tournament to the next. Each player is able to see their "bracket pool" and know exactly how many wins are required in order to advance to Day 2; on the other hand, if each player were to be presented one big bracket, it would be very unclear how many wins are required in order to advance to the next stage of the tournament.Did you know that generating fair pools for "Bracket pools" with a seeded list of all players, is LITERALLY the SAME thing as having ONE large BRACKET. So please stop calling it bracket pools. It's just one bracket.
No. If the pools are seeded fairly with M players, so you see [seed(1) vs seed(M)], [seed(2) vs seed(M-1)], etc in the first round, and each pool has equal seed average, then it is literally identical to one bracket except for an extra round granted to the person that gets second in their bracket.Even if it is just one big bracket, it's actually a bit misleading to communicate "one big bracket" to attendees, because that doesn't indicate when you stop playing on Day 1. I like the "bracket pool" terminology because it indicates a clear cutoff from the initial stage of the tournament to the next. Each player is able to see their "bracket pool" and know exactly how many wins are required in order to advance to Day 2; on the other hand, if each player were to be presented one big bracket, it would be very unclear how many wins are required in order to advance to the next stage of the tournament.
So no, it's not literally the same thing when you take scheduling into consideration. Historically, "one big bracket" implies that Smashers are to play out all their tournament obligations on the same day until they are eliminated. Whereas "pools" implies an initial stage of the tournament where Smashers play a fixed number of matches (or fixed maximum number of matches, in this case) before the next stage of the tournament which occurs much later in the schedule.
ok my memory fails, what did they run last yearPersonally I'm glad APEX is doing bracket pools. A major issue APEX has had in prior years is number of setups, the tournament taking too much time, and not having many friendlies. With true bracket pools (and not the fake ones from last year) you save yourself a good chunk of time and there aren't weird situations where a player is allowed to lose 3 times instead of 2. Good stuff APEX staff.
They ran "bracket pools" where the top 4 of the bracket all went into a re-seeded 128 man bracket, all in winners. Several players actually lost 4 sets in the tournament last year, which kind of defeats the purpose of running bracket pools.
That sounded like the best idea to do it by far imo. It allows us unseeded players that are prevented from attendning "road to apex" tournaments to get seeded in bracket pools.They ran "bracket pools" where the top 4 of the bracket all went into a re-seeded 128 man bracket, all in winners. Several players actually lost 4 sets in the tournament last year, which kind of defeats the purpose of running bracket pools.
Not sure if any were added but i just booked one yesterday and they told me to tell anyone else who may be going that there are still some spots on te apex block left.Any more hotel rooms added?
You still don't get the point.No. If the pools are seeded fairly with M players, so you see [seed(1) vs seed(M)], [seed(2) vs seed(M-1)], etc in the first round, and each pool has equal seed average, then it is literally identical to one bracket except for an extra round granted to the person that gets second in their bracket.
Even for scheduling, you just say to people that you are only running the first N rounds of winners in day 1, where N = LOG2(number players you want in a "pool"), and it can be scheduled the same.
Edit: After losers finals in the "pool", you have someone who has 1 loss and you have someone with no loses. If they were to use that as the seeding for the actual bracket, then it is identical. If they play a grand finals, then someone with 2 set losses will still get to go the final bracket.
Bracket pools allow the TO to adjust the seeding half-way through the tournament. You can even have multiple rounds of bracket pools. It's definitely not the same as one big bracket.