Black/Light
Smash Master
- Joined
- May 23, 2006
- Messages
- 3,207
Wow, that looks real.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Also, why is the starting roster SO disorganized? Link is nowhere near Zelda, Mario is nowhere near Peach OR Bowser...That pic is fake. Why would u put zelda and sheik together? that's stupid, and why was there a Samus/Zamus spot?
For future reference, I wasn't addressing you specifically, I was using you as an example to illustrate a point.Hmm, I wonder to whom you might be preaching...could it be moi? Well, in that case:
1) Hyperbole has its place; don't forget it. Words like "abomination," "horrendous," and the like are used for effect (or at least when I've seen them). Granted, they still betray a disappointment with choices made about this roster, but I think you're overanalyzing the word choice of many of us malcontents.
2) I don't agree with the people that simply say how awful the roster is sans explanation. Some, however, bring up valid concerns and problems with what has been (allegedly) revealed. (I will touch more upon this in the next section.)
3) Oh, what a difference 10 characters make, though! You're comparing two radically different times: think of it as the world pre- and post-World War II. A major event (allegedly true roster reveal) that turned the world upside down. (Again, hyperbole--learn to understand it. But there is absolutely no denying that the Smash community isn't generally up in arms about all of this.) When it was simply the 25 characters revealed by the DOJO, the roster seemed perfect. Sakurai was really taking directly from the famed "journal," and it seemed like this game was all about fanservice. We had so many newcomers, and it seemed unlikely that we could possibly have seen most of them...there had to be plenty more hidden newcomers, too...right? Until this alleged leak came to pass, I was convinced that this roster would be truly perfect. Delusional? Perhaps. But few of us had any reason to doubt that Sakurai was doing everything possible to please as many fans as possible: plenty of characters, and good ones at that.
Since you are most likely addressing my disdainful remark about the "ridiculously small" roster, that was more in reference to a point brought up by FlipTroopa. I could live with a 35-character roster, don't get me wrong; but my sardonic comment was more criticismic of the way in which Nintendo's own hype and information have shaped our collective expectations for the game. Sakurai has hinted that this would be his last game, or at least the last Smash game. The DOJO frequently makes note of things being as good as they possibly can be, saying that "they really have thought of everything!" Our expectations are high for a good reason.
Your figures aren't necessary in this case; I know that 35 is a big number for a character roster in a fighting game, and I'm sure most of the community here does as well. The only games that come to mind with higher numbers are MvC, and that's a different beast altogether. (Although Smash-X was kind enough to post roster numbers that were actually higher than 35, just for reference.) As you might have noticed (in perusing the thread's previous pages), members like ChronoBound and myself are disappointed with the quality, NOT quantity of the roster.
And in that same vein, the reason many of us are disappointed is not because there are only 10 characters left; we are disappointed because of who is left. Most of these "last surprises" are highly unsurprising: 6.5 veterans, 3.5 newcomers. (I use halves because Toon Link is essentially Young Link--a veteran--with a graphical overhaul, making him technically a newcomer.) Among those newcomers, two are HIGHLY questionable (Wolf and R.O.B.), and one is questionable in the sense of who it replaced (Lucario replacing Mewtwo). The fact that StarFox gets three representatives, at least one of whom will likely be a Fox clone, seems odd when a franchise like Metroid is still left with Samus by her lonesome--not to mention the fact that Wolf hadn't NEARLY the amount of fan support that Krystal had.
Also lacking is the element of surprise. These characters, these faces that we've all seen before--THESE are the hidden characters?! We expect something unexpected and exciting; to leave rehashed characters as "secret" seems anticlimactic. This is what posters like FlipTroopa and myself mean when we say that our hype for the game has died. There isn't anything terribly exciting about the characters left to be revealed. Three-fourths of the remaining combatants have all been seen before, and the other quarter of them are questionable choices. To unlock Ridley, for example, would be far more surprising and enjoyable than unlocking, for example, Wolf.
4) Ah, the personal reference. Since you are so interested in figures--including my high post count--might I suggest that you take a peek at when I joined these boards? ...August 2001, you say? Ah, I see. Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but Brawl was first officially announced at E3 '05--May 2005, am I right? And, well, barring some strange rift in the time-space continuum, I find it to be a physical impossibility for me to have "HONESTLY" become so enthralled with this game "SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE" (i.e. "JUST BECAUSE") of expecting an unconfirmed character whose chances aren't guaranteed.
Yes, 'tis true: I joined in anticipation of Melee way back when. And I never got involved with the Smash series because I was truly hoping that X character would be playable--that's foolish. I became enthralled with the series because Nintendo has been a huge part of my life since age 3. To me, the Smash series encapsulates so much (if not all) of what Nintendo is. I love the Smash series for its style, its gameplay, and its celebration of Nintendo's history.
That being said, despite my love of Smash stemming from its overarching features, the specifics DO matter, and no specific aspect is more important than the roster itself. One excluded character does not a bad roster make (again, hyperbole is our friend sometimes!), but a slew of them missing does tend to fuel discontent with the final product. It isn't as though I will boycott the game and curse the name of Nintendo. Of course I'll buy the game on release day, probably as early as possible so I can play it as much as possible on the day of release. It just won't be nearly as exciting as it could have been--wasted potential, to be frank.
So, in short, I think that there are overreactions throughout the thread, but I wouldn't call them a majority by any means. MANY of us are legitimately dissatisfied with the roster for realistic reasons--very few people were expecting 75 characters with 4 reps per franchise or something exorbitant. I think you're either misconstruing some of what has been said by a good number of us, or simply overemphasizing those who do not rationalize their complaints.
And, since you chose to go toe-to-toe (): who are you to complain about this thread and those who post in it? Come down off that high horse for a second; no one asked you to come preach to the disgruntled masses, and I honestly don't think your admonitions are as necessary as you have deluded yourself into believing. If you are so aggravated with this thread every time you come back, there's a simple solution: don't.
Much as your misguided, pseudo-altruism has driven you preach to us, I must likewise stress a point to you:
Many members of the Smash community were highly disappointed with Melee's final roster. Many members of the Smash community will be similarly disappointed with Brawl's final roster. There will be plenty of complaining; frankly, I think this thread is just the tip of the iceberg. Granted, it will die down after a good while, but it won't be immediate.
And, again, if you are so aggravated by the general dissatisfaction with this roster, just think: wouldn't you rather people complain now instead of later? I, for one, would much prefer to get it all over with now.
I look forward to reading your original message once again. And, say, if you really want to garner some attention, don't just go bold--underline and italicize, pump the text up to size 7 (at least!), and put it all in red! I'm sure that will get the message across.
I believe it was just randomly found. So far we don't know who posted it yet.Most games have a rating on the disc. I even checked. Sorry, I think this might be fake. Who did you say posted this?
No problem, and I hope I didn't sound too argumentative. I'm a fan of writing as well, so it's nice to see someone with a similar appreciate for the power of the written word. Sometimes, however, my emphases will go unnoticed because of both the subtlety I try to convey from time to time (gotta make people think!) and the "that's a given" understanding of what I am saying that is already present in my mind.For future reference, I wasn't addressing you specifically, I was using you as an example to illustrate a point.
And I will apologize for labeling you, because you actually brought up some valid points in that previous post. But that's the thing..
1. I'm not on a high horse. I'm being honest. I don't think I'm better than you guys, I'm thinking a lot of the people on this board are better than they're acting. That's my point.
2. Hyperbole does have it's place, but when you read "it's a bad roster" compared to "this roster is an ABOMINATION", there's a difference.
3. I'm a writer. Most of the time when you write dialogue you capitalize certain parts of the sentence for emphasis. Maybe that leaked through.
So yes, my misunderstanding on that. But shorter versions of the post you just did is what I'm not seeing. It's like the past two times I've come in here, it IS overreaction.
but I still standby the fact that this ISN'T the worst roster ever created.
Zss is NOT a pure character addition. I remember Sakurai saying this in the old DOJO.that cant be true, zss is a new character, yet you cant choose her unless you get the a smash ball? I call this BS!
In Japan? And if so, do you know what the Japanese rating system looks like?Most games have a rating on the disc. I even checked. Sorry, I think this might be fake. Who did you say posted this?
Also explains why the names are spelled like that. The Japan demos had them all spelt that way. . . (refering to PT and DK being "P.Trainer/ Donkey")But that's the japanese version, dunno if they have ratings
The dude clearly just got the game, so of course this is the case.This might just be me... but maybe he hasn't unlocked them?
stop denying the fact.No not over....we still have too many loop holes. Krystal voice leak. Animal Crossing rep. Balloon Fighter fish pointed out. Ridley hints. It just all doesn't add up yet.
I'm so confused about this game right now.
Krystal VA. . .NPC like Slappy.No not over....we still have too many loop holes. Krystal voice leak. Animal Crossing rep. Balloon Fighter fish pointed out. Ridley hints. It just all doesn't add up yet.
I'm so confused about this game right now.
This MOCKUP was posted a long time ago of how the character selection screen looks once its filled upShut up, we have no proof that it's real, it's very possible it's real however, so everyone should brace for impact.
"GoateBoate
Posted 1/19/2008 10:06:43 PM
message detail I will admit. I have no credibility whatsover on my own part because I will not reveal my source. However, I will tell you what I know to be correct. The "rows" indicate each row in the character select screen. The characters go from left to right on each row.
Row 1
Mario
DK
Link
Samus
Kirby
Fox
Pikachu
Marth
Mr. Game & Watch
Row 2
Luigi
Diddy Kong
Zelda
Pit
Meta Knight
Falco
Pokemon Trainer
Ike
Snake
Row 3
Peach
Yoshi
Ganondorf
Ice Climbers
King Dedede
Lucario
Ness
Sonic
Bowser
Row 4
Wario
Toon Link
R.O.B. (star fox)
Captain Olimar
Captain Falcon
Lucas
Wolf
Jigglypuff"
Look at the times. According to this, that picture has been out for awhile and that person called this "roster" on the 19th.This MOCKUP was posted a long time ago of how the character selection screen looks once its filled up
NOW, hours later, we received a leaked image of the STARTING ROSTER which PERFECTLY MATCHES THE LEAKED ROSTER if you take away the secret characters.
Not to mention how four separate people all came up with the same 35 character roster.
35 characters for brawl.
Yes, I agree. I've been saying this for the longest. Truthfully, we should at least have just as many secret newcomers as secret vets. It just doesn't make sense for most of the SECRET characters to be characters that we've already played as.If the 35 character roster is real, and the leaked picture of the starting roster is real...then that means that out of all the unlockables, only 5 are new characters - ROB, Wolf, Lucario, Sonic, and Snake. Also, cartoon Link...but I just consider him to be a different variation of "Young Link" myself.
Pure suckage.
Uhh...Did you not see that random button? And what are talking about "if I remember right?"Has anyone mentioned that the 35 roster will produce 4 rows of exactly 9 chars? ZSS eventually gets her own icon, if I remember right. 36/4 = 9
I forgot about the random button, but didn't the demos give ZSS her own icon? Maybe it was a demo specific thing.Yes, I agree. I've been saying this for the longest. Truthfully, we should at least have just as many secret newcomers as secret vets. It just doesn't make sense for most of the SECRET characters to be characters that we've already played as.
Uhh...Did you not see that random button? And what are talking about "if I remember right?"
No, they didn't.I forgot about the random button, but didn't the demos give ZSS her own icon? Maybe it was a demo specific thing.