APC99
Smash Master
Not enough screen time for Pac-Man (there's never enough), but, otherwise, amazing.
I'd imagine his gameplay footage would be longer, like Mega Man's.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Not enough screen time for Pac-Man (there's never enough), but, otherwise, amazing.
You can also group them asI can't help but notice the potential pattern in showcasing these six different characters in two separate sets, given that the leak does end up to be true.
1st (already confirmed) Set: Villager, Mega Man, and Wii Fit Trainer
2nd (have yet to be revealed) Set: Mii, Pac-Man, and Little Mac
What do each character's "pair" partner share in terms of relativity?
"The Avatars" (Villager and Mii): Both of these characters are meant to represent the player.
"The Icons" (Mega Man and Pac-Man): Arguably two of the highest tiered gaming icons representing Capcom and Namco Bandai respectively. May also add that they are both "Man"s/Men.
"The Health-nuts" (Wii Fit Trainer and Little Mac): Fitness Trainer and a Boxer. Can't get much healthier than that.
OVER-ANALYZING FTW
People are still super against Pac-Man and Mii, it's one of the reason they don't believe the leak.There are people who still believe this?
It's probably not real. There is nothing that suggest it is. He stated these characters were to be shown off at E3 but it's been a few months with no sign of them. There is also the fact that Sakurai pretty much ruled out Pac-Man.People are still super against Pac-Man and Mii, it's one of the reason they don't believe the leak.
But the leak is probably real.
Little Mac serves as the retro newcomer of the roster.
Pac-Man serves as a big gaming icon to be kept in the roster.
Mii serves as the customizable character of this game.
It all makes sense to me.
Welcome to humanity.There are people who still believe this?
here a devil advocates conspiracy what if the spoiled newcomers are the only newcomers in this game?
that does not rule out pacman all that says is pacman will not get in just because namco is working on the game.It's probably not real. There is nothing that suggest it is. He stated these characters were to be shown off at E3 but it's been a few months with no sign of them. There is also the fact that Sakurai pretty much ruled out Pac-Man.
I so hope it's not that way because with only 6 new characters which 3 of them being a humanoid character it just seem to be like a expansion rather then a true sequel.I'm pretty sure this is true, actually. The info the leaker got was probably "all the new characters", but he misinterpreted it as "all the new characters announced at E3".
Sakurai told us a long time ago that the emphasis wasn't on roster expansion this time. Six characters sounds about right, when you consider that.
Which is an inherently erroneous proclamation by Sakurai, assuming Pacman is selected as a potential roster slot.that does not rule out pacman all that says is pacman will not get in just because namco is working on the game.
I so hope it's not that way because with only 6 new characters which 3 of them being a humanoid character it just seem to be like a expansion rather then a true sequel.
See what MorbidAltruism said. Basically, the main reason Pac-Man is even suggested is that Namco Bandia is working on the game. If Sakurai rules that out, there is nothing else the character has going for it.that does not rule out pacman all that says is pacman will not get in just because namco is working on the game.
See what MorbidAltruism said. Basically, the main reason Pac-Man is even suggested is that Namco Bandia is working on the game. If Sakurai rules that out, there is nothing else the character has going for it.
A better question is why add Pac-Man. He suffers both in terms of popularity and moves. He has little interest in all regions. His popularity is non-existent in Japan and Namco discussion revolves around Tekken and Tales. In the west, it is still very lackluster. In terms of moves, Snake, Sonic and Megaman have very unique moves they pull from their games and differentiate themselves from the rest of the Nintendo cast. This is important because they are guest and with the hoops Sakurai has to go though getting them (legal, financial, and maintaining the content). Pac-Man distinctive ability, eating, is already covered by 4 characters (Yoshi, K. Dedede, Kirby and Wario). Other moves tend to reflect moves of other characters. Even worse, they tend to borrow from the character less popular games. The other characters pull from all their games. So why add a character this isn't Nintendo, isn't well liked, and doesn't even have distinguishable abilities. If Tecmo was making this, Pac-Man wouldn't even be brought up. This should tell you why he makes no sense. He is expected. Not wanted. There are plenty of other Nintendo characters who do a better job and would be easier to get.I still wonder why they wouldn't add Pac though, at the moment he's going full force with a new lease on his gaming career and even that TV Show currently. Adding Pac would satisfy the whole world and both the new + old generation of gamers.
We have already MegaMan AND Sonic so why not go a one more step further to make SSB4 perhaps the best videogame gathering of all time?
Yet Wii Fit Trainer had no popularity in terms of requests.A better question is why add Pac-Man. He suffers both in terms of popularity and moves. He has little interest in all regions. His popularity is non-existent in Japan and Namco discussion revolves around Tekken and Tales. In the west, it is still very lackluster. In terms of moves, Snake, Sonic and Megaman have very unique moves they pull from their games and differentiate themselves from the rest of the Nintendo cast. This is important because they are guest and with the hoops Sakurai has to go though getting them (legal, financial, and maintaining the content). Pac-Man distinctive ability, eating, is already covered by 4 characters (Yoshi, K. Dedede, Kirby and Wario). Other moves tend to reflect moves of other characters. Even worse, they tend to borrow from the character less popular games. The other characters pull from all their games. So why add a character this isn't Nintendo, isn't well liked, and doesn't even have distinguishable abilities. If Tecmo was making this, Pac-Man wouldn't even be brought up. This should tell you why he makes no sense. He is expected. Not wanted. There are plenty of other Nintendo characters who do a better job and would be easier to get.
As for him appeal to new and old gamers: I don't think he appeals to old players. People who played Pac-Man back in the 80s see Pac-Man as a pie graph. They see him in the same way as frogger. They wouldn't see him as an interesting character because all he does is eat and they don't care for the more recent games. Sales numbers will show you that Pac-Man has really struggled since the 80s which is why the company has put less and less focus on him. From what I've seen, the people who like Pac-Man, as a character, are kids. This is because the character is more recent to them, and since they didn't play the game in the 80s, they don't differentiate between new and old Pac-Man. There is a clear difference and a difference in the mind of consumers. Pac-Man's target audience is kids now. So who is going to want him in Smash? Kids. The older Pac-Man fans wouldn't want him because they understand Pac-Man is a circle who eats dots and doesn't fit in very well. Megaman already appeals to everyone that Pac-fans claim Pac-Man will appeal to.
WFT is a Nintendo character. It also sold over 19 million copies and has a sequel and another game down the road.Yet Wii Fit Trainer had no popularity in terms of requests.
Pac-Man was requested during the pre-Brawl days too. Of course with Namco working on the game interest in the character has sparked up much more than before, but I do remember Pac-Man being a discussed subject pre-Brawl too.See what MorbidAltruism said. Basically, the main reason Pac-Man is even suggested is that Namco Bandia is working on the game. If Sakurai rules that out, there is nothing else the character has going for it.
She's the ocassional wtf character, like R.O.B and Mr. Game & Watch. Most other character that have been brought in have gotten in either due to being a retro, last minute clone, or as with the majority: they were requested characters.Yet Wii Fit Trainer had no popularity in terms of requests.
Because an average cartoon and a mediocre shovelware title suddenly makes you the cream of the crop.I still wonder why they wouldn't add Pac though, at the moment he's going full force with a new lease on his gaming career and even that TV Show currently. Adding Pac would satisfy the whole world and both the new + old generation of gamers.
No he wasn't. He never came up. If you look at Shorties poll in 2010, you'll see it at the bottom.Pac-Man was requested during the pre-Brawl days too. Of course with Namco working on the game interest in the character has sparked up much more than before, but I do remember Pac-Man being a discussed subject pre-Brawl too.
I recall Pac-man rarely being brought up, but NEVER dominated in any shape or form. He was just yet another possible third-party character that was brought up on rare occasions, but just like many of them, Pac-man was heavily overshadowed by Mega Man and Sonic. I recall Bomberman having stronger support actually...No he wasn't. He never came up. If you look at Shorties poll in 2010, you'll see it at the bottom.
Shortie Schmortie poll, I'm talking pre-Brawl where a lot of 3rd parties were talked about. Like Xenoblaze says though, he was mostly categorized alongside most other 3rd parties of course, being under the foot of Mega Man and Sonic, and even Bomber Man too, but the point was that he was brought up occasionally.No he wasn't. He never came up. If you look at Shorties poll in 2010, you'll see it at the bottom.
Brought up like Toe Jam and Earl was brought up. Cloud and Master Chief were more popular than him. Pac-Man was never taken seriously.Shortie Schmortie poll, I'm talking pre-Brawl where a lot of 3rd parties were talked about. Like Xenoblaze says though, he was mostly categorized alongside most other 3rd parties of course, being under the foot of Mega Man and Sonic, and even Bomber Man too, but the point was that he was brought up occasionally.
May I borrow your time machine, seeing as you somehow know that a game is mediocre when it hasn't been released yet?Because an average cartoon and a mediocre shovelware title suddenly makes you the cream of the crop.
Wow.......so excitingMay I borrow your time machine, seeing as you somehow know that a game is mediocre when it hasn't been released yet
Oh yeah, I completely forgot that you're supposed to judge the entire game based on watching a short demo. Now hand me that book so I can judge it by its cover.
Forget having an opinion on a game before it's released. I can't say the game looks like a slow bland and uninspired 3D platformer. I have to shell out 50-60 bucks doing that. Forget making informed opinions.Oh yeah, I completely forgot that you're supposed to judge the entire game based on watching a short demo. Now hand me that book so I can judge it by its cover.
In other words, an OK 3D Platformer. A rental, if you will.It actually looks a lot like Pac-Man World 2, which was pretty good. I'll wait for the reviews to see what the critics think before I make assumptions.
You can have an opinion, but you shouldn't state it as fact. We may THINK it's a mediocre title, but we won't know for sure until the game comes out.Forget having an opinion on a game before it's released. I can't say the game looks like a slow bland and uninspired 3D platformer. I have to shell out 50-60 bucks doing that. Forget making informed opinions.
Exactly, you can rent it and try it out before buying it. Then you can make an informed decision. Unless 3D Platformers aren't your thing.In other words, an OK 3D Platformer. A rental, if you will.
By your arguments, Megaman wouldn't be in either. Or Sonic, for that matter. These characters are requested more for their legacy than for being current top-sellers or having recent high-quality games.
I was never stating it as fact. I post it so you can assume it my opinion. I'm not going to say "wow........so exciting, I say sarcastically as I signify my opinion of this game isn't high." I shouldn't have to spell it out for you. You should be smarter than this.You can have an opinion, but you shouldn't state it as fact. We may THINK it's a mediocre title, but we won't know for sure until the game comes out.
No, I mean the game is worth a rental at best. It's a waste of a purchase. 3/5. Get my drift.Exactly, you can rent it and try it out before buying it. Then you can make an informed decision. Unless 3D Platformers aren't your thing.
These characters requested because people like them and believe they are part of Nintendo's history. Megaman is considered just as much of a Nintendo character as any to fans and everyone wants to see the rivalry of Sonic and Mario. Pac-Man doesn't have that kind of connection with Nintendo.These characters are requested more for their legacy than for being current top-sellers or having recent high-quality games.