I'll follow your technique.
So far, I haven't heard a complaint, and while we had our 1 on 1, Hive and Alt/RDK successfully ignored us and continued their 1on1. They never pm'd me with a concern, and I have told them both to be very honest with me about any concerns or things that are bothersome. I keep an open door policy.
Why would they? They're on their own topic of conversation.
This would only come up from they tried to interact with our thread of the conversation, and I think that it showed rather clearly when RDK responded to portions of our branch without really understanding where it had gone.
First of all, in terms of being organized and spam-free, we are the best room in SWF. That is a fact. People can come in and read the topic's title(which is the whole point of a title, a mini thesis) and already have a generalized direction of what to look for in posts. If someone wanted to actually discuss agnosticism, they could have easily followed Alt/HIVE/RDK/Reaver. If they wanted to delve into our slightly off topic 1on1, they could have done so too. You really shouldn't underestimate a lurker's ability to choose what they want:-p.
About making new topics, I'll talk it over with Med and CK so we don't have these sort of problems again. Hope you're not upset with me.
Oh, don't think I'm annoyed, entirely the opposite, I've actually become quite interested in our little debate about education philosophy in regards to the DH.
You'll get no argument from me about this being the most organized room.
I just think in terms of the topics being maximally effective on review (and never underestimate the long-term value of threads like these even years after they died) as well as allowing everyone on the thread at the time to benefit from everything said, they need to remain at least relatively on-topic.
I want to especially consider our sub-topic in this, if a person were trying to find out about that, they don't have the subject line to go on, so how are they going to know that there was a discussion in the thread?
So, that's my two cents on the issue, thanks for hearing me out.