• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Jam Stunna
Reaction score
785

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Hey could you put this on my video thing because i can't get on to the melee boards or you could let me back and save your self some time because i plan on adding some more later

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veHlCHs6sok&feature=related Wobbles (IC's) Vs Taj (Marth) Rd 3 Set 1 (funny)


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIIArihXJK0&feature=related Wobbles (IC's) Vs Forward (Fox) Rd 2
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9jkx6YCahc&feature=related Wobbles (IC's) Vs Forward (Fox) Rd 3
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvTaZ0xfoaY&feature=related Wobbles (IC's) Vs Forward (Fox) Rd 4
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBRZ6bIIUgU&feature=related Wobbles (IC's) Vs Forward (Falco) Rd 3




    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkQjWKuDc6o&feature=related PC Chris (Peach) vs Wobbles (ICs) 1
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_LcNbsNwnE&feature=related PC Chris (Peach) vs Wobbles (ICs) 2


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sm3j8IY6xhE Chu Dat (Ice Climbers) Vs Shiz (Falco) Revival of Melee Match 1
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjE4V6YAnU4&feature=related Chu Dat (Ice Climbers) Vs Shiz (Falco) Revival of Melee Match 2
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-BzFTfzae8&feature=related Chu Dat (Ice Climbers) Vs Shiz (Falco) Revival of Melee Match 3

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7D9gZZh2TNA&feature=related Chu(Ice Climbers) vs Mango(Puff) Revival of Melee Match1
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2B46YNq0iM&feature=related Chu(Ice Climbers) vs Mango(Puff) Revival of Melee Match2
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-rQFLGxdKU&feature=related Chu(Ice Climbers) vs Mango(Puff) Revival of Melee Match 3

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbGV7e6JjLw&feature=related Ken (Marth) vs ChuDat (Ice Climbers) 1
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOomgRLzYFM Ken vs Chu Dat 1 OC2 Zero Challenge
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hPNW-5AE6o&feature=related Ken vs Chu Dat 3
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EK0rshvVcoA&feature=related MLG Anaheim Ken vs Chu 2
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htpwXWr1dRA&feature=related MLG Anaheim Ken vs Chu 3
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjIo-GKh2gA&feature=related MLG Chicago Ken vs Chu 2
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWFmLF3fHw8&feature=related MLG Chicago Ken vs Chu 3
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vljPWkfeMdo&feature=related MLG Chicago Ken vs Chu 5




    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hH5Z-_sKrYM&feature=related MLG Orlando finals Chudat (IceClimbers) vs Azen (C Falcon) 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJ4qJk2NCG8&feature=related Azen (Captain Falcon) vs Chudat (Ice Climbers) 1
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbTdAJ4Y4Vw&feature=related Azen (Captain Falcon) vs Chudat (Ice Climbers) 2
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNwlkP_5E4c&feature=related Azen (Captain Falcon) vs Chudat (Ice Climbers) 3
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVa891A07LU&feature=related Azen (Captain Falcon) vs Chudat (Ice Climbers) 4
    Thanks man. That's a shame, SWF has some pretty talented writers, like yourself. :D
    Hey, I was thinking of perhaps putting my story in the User Blogs section, for all the regulars there who don't check out Creative Minds to give me feedback on. In retrospect, I might post my following chapters there as well. I'm not sure if I'm fully ready for CM yet.

    Would it be ok to post it there?
    hey, i am not allowed in the melee part of smash boards and i was wondering why? And if it's the pichu boards, I said i wasn't going to post for a week in the pichu boards and i wasn't going to. peace out
    it's okay really, and yes they were right. I really should have became more aquinted with the rules then. And thank you and i well. Nice metting you and your nice ^^
    He'll turn up, ask me a question, I'll turn around, answer it, look back, and he'll be gone. You couldn't have been more right XD
    Thank you very much! I'm very glad you enjoyed it! Do you offhand know when the next WWYP will be? Perhaps a rough estimate if possible?
    Hey, could you help me out with something screwing up in my member tier list thread in the user blogs section. For some reason, I cannot post the characters images using the :character: notation to get :sonic: :snake: etc. everytime i use that code, it just types it in text. ive used it in my other posts in that thread, but it just refuses to work for me in the OP. if you see the edit version of my post, i had to simply post the
    June 25th? *marks it on his calender* W00T

    I'm good...getting ready for a tourney, working on a paper, seeing my gf today, doing forum stuff (advertising is a pain XD)...jus' livin' and lovin' XD
    We'll see :p
    I love how you got your wife to read Vyse's paper because it was so good lol.
    So, is this rumor I hear about BlazBlue being released in June true? =D

    That's gonna be epic...

    SO HOW ARE YOU XD
    Monday, June 09, 2008
    Selective Implication
    I noticed something new today, arguing as I often do with people that I generally agree with about most things because we disagree on some small thing. And I'm struck with the realization that it seems to be remarkably easy for people who don't want to think about something to not think about it.

    A useful term to describe the specific phenomenon I'm encountering is "selective implication". This is a phenomenon where a word has certain implications and connotations that are selectively applied. This can be a good thing if used correctly; sometimes for lack of a better word, we use one that implies something slightly different than what we actually mean, and it gets the point across. We leave it up to the plausibility and context to determine what was actually meant by that word in that case, and which connotations or implications might not be intended. For example, the phrase "Capitalism has brought great wealth to the world" is not using the word "capitalism"'s capacity to imply exploitation. The phrase "Gravediggers of Capitalism" is not using the word "capitalism"'s capacity to imply prosperity.

    In my previous post on my other blog I described a mental filter I use to compare ideas to each other, and throw away useless ones. A variant of this filter is pretty common to libertarians (I think mine developed from the common libertarian version). The difference appears to be that libertarians very often use this filter on words, not on the ideas that the words stand for. Libertarians very often insist on a very strict definition of capitalism to mean "free market" (although I don't know why they use the word "capitalism" when "free market" does a better job with less fuss). In doing this, they strip "capitalism" down to what they believe to be it's core meaning, and throw away all it's other implications and connotations. As I've said, this can be a useful thing. Libertarians tend to be very precise thinkers. Not always necessarily accurate, but precise. In a "2.24885837+2.11358=3.92485263" sense. But this habit often leads to libertarians stripping away some very important implications and connotations that these ideas and words carry that screw with their ability to understand new ideas that they are not familiar with. It also gives a lot of room for people to assert things that aren't true as if they were obvious. Somebody who doesn't care a bit for the word "Capitalism" will rarely be seen defending inanely huge fortunes on the grounds that the free market naturally produces them. Somebody who cares for nothing but the word "Capitalism" will rarely fail to do so. And very often those who believe that inanely huge fortunes are not legitimate creations of the free market will be denounced as "socialists".


    "Whatever you do, do not think of an elephant."

    The above instruction is impossible to comply with once having heard it. As soon as you read or hear the word elephant, you're thinking of a big gray animal with a long trunk. If I call a rock "the elephant", I'm not trying to say it's a biological, living, breathing thing. It's obviously not. What I'm trying to do is put the implications of the word "elephant" in your head; I trust you to make the necessary connections between the rock I'm talking about and an elephant, or to discover what rock I'm talking about by associating the idea of a "rock" with the implications of the word "elephant". Maybe it's got a trunk-like feature, on the end of an elephant-head shaped bulge on one end, maybe it's just a big rock the size of an elephant, maybe it's a statue of an elephant. Whatever it is, you know **** well I'm not telling you that the rock has a large brain and grows ivory tusks, even though these are quite essential characteristics of elephants.

    "I hate going to work."

    I don't know about you, but what passes through my mind when I read the word "work" in this sentence is doing things you've done a hundred times before, leaving home every day, being on a schedule, earning a wage or salary, coming home late in the day, the color of dirt and wood, fighting rush hour traffic, dealing with annoying coworkers and customers, going to sleep tired and waking up tired the next morning because that's the schedule, and the fear of not being in control of things and the dependence upon your boss's happiness. These are the images that come to mind.

    When I say "work should be abolished" I'm obviously not talking about the definition from physics. I'm not talking about all productive endeavor. I'm not talking about doing something you don't like. I'm using the word "work" because there's no other word that brings up enough and the same implications and connotations (and as few unwanted or extraneous implications and connotations) as I want you to think of when I choose a word to describe it.

    When I say I am opposed to capitalism, I am not saying I oppose free markets. I'm saying I'm opposed to at least most of the things that the word "capitalism" implies, centralized wealth and wealth disparity, bosses and workers, consumerism, consumption, the GDP, corporations, pointless extravagance...that's what I'm opposed to. It is unfortunate that "capitalism" has come to imply "free markets" in addition to these things, as there's no reason for it to be so.

    When I say I am opposed to government, I am not saying I'm opposed to order, agreement, or control. I'm saying I'm opposed to politics, opposed to making other people's decisions for them, opposed to lies and bull****, opposed to monopoly, opposed to all the witless slogans and arrogance and raw, unsubstantial imagery that is brought to mind when I hear, see, or speak the word "government".

    A lot of the time all it takes to understand somebody is to try to understand them. Not to hear them, not to listen to them, but to actually recognize that there is an idea, probably at least somewhat sensible, that they are trying to communicate to you, and to try, make a conscious effort, to understand what they are talking about. Robots would object to my calling a rock an elephant on the grounds that rocks and elephants are defined in a mutually exclusive manner. People respond by thinking about what rock or what elephant I might be talking about and how the one relates to the other. Don't be a **** robot. Be a person.
    A thread for the DH?

    Last Activity: Today 01:40 PM
    Current Activity: Creating Thread Debate Hall

    LOL I guess so. <_<
    D
    Is it hard modding the blogs? I can imagine that every time you log off, the spam accumulates like crazy.
    D
    Hey, just found out you're a dad too. If you're having another kid, I'd name him "Peanut Butta Stunna" his friends would look up to him for his pimpness.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Top Bottom