Yeah no thats fine, that was hardly a rant by any stretch. Heres some food for thought that you can really call a text wall lol: Yeah I can see where you're coming from with the planking data now. It was never an issue for the most part because of MAS's ledge grab limit, but in other areas where there is not a limit (or even here if you can do it intelligently) its a major problem. Considering the ease that MK can poke it isn't a stretch to say I could create a 30% lead and plank for 5 minutes even with a limit on edge grabs. Overall I still support my idea of a two bracket system, let the M2Ks of the community deal with what they have created if they so choose, but I'd gladly enter a bracket where people can't pull out an MK trump card (though personally I'm not good enough for it to be a major issue yet).
Let me take the last MAS as an example: Me and YoshQ were both in the same pool with Wafles. As you probably know my Luigi isn't something to scoff at, but YoshQ's is a monster, comparable to Boss. Wafles has a fairly good Falco, not Arty good, but good. I mention this as it makes for an interesting study on the nature of MK in the current metagame, though I'm not sure what point it exactly makes, thats sort of up to the observer to decide. (all of these matches are available for veiwing on Ankoku's Youtube channel) Me and Wafles have our pools matches, he uses his main Falco while I use Luigi for both matches. We go fairly even, with me gaining an early lead and losing on the last stock in both matches. Though it's safe to say I'm not experienced at fighting Falcos as I've fought very few, we can safely say I did well but Wafles did better. Now the pools matches with YoshQ come up. It can be reasonably assumed by my previous results that it would take only a slight increase in skill level for Luigi to overtake his Falco (if the matches had unfolded that way I may have been able to say this more concretely but they didn't) Instead of attempting to use his Falco against YoshQ Wafles switches to MK from the get go. Now logically theres only one reason he would attempt this: He thinks he has a legitimately better chance at a win against YoshQ with MK. As I watched I could tell Wafles's Meta was not up to par with his Falco on skill level, but it managed to stay roughly even with YoshQ for game 1 and nearly beat him game 2, both games ending at high percents on the last stock. Can I for sure say that his Falco would have fared worse? No. But his motives for choosing MK are quite clear. In my matches he used Falco because he likes Falco (thus he mains him) and knew he had an acceptable chance of winning against me as he didn't know my skill level prior to the first match. When YoshQ, a competitor he knew was above his skill level despite using the same character as me (thus not a character factor), came up for his matches it was MK all the way. Clearly Wafles used MK as a fall-back to attempt and secure wins that otherwise wouldn't have been his. It's safe to say that If I had taken the first match instead of whiffed it, MK would have been present in match 2. I noticed Wafles using the same logic against ChuDat and BMX when the time for their matches came.
Though technically I'm only speaking of Wafles in this example the mentality of "If I can't beat em MK" is present for other individuals and frankly disturbs me. Lain has exhibited this trend recently, as well as Ally to some extent. An example more close to home can also be found in Kenni. How many times has he lost round 1 and decided "F it lets throw MK at em and see what happens". Though usually when this strategy is used the MK is a bit subpar it's not a difficult mental leap for any one of these competitors to decide that if they just spent as much time on MK as they have with their respective mains they would win the matches they were throwing MK at before. Fatboy for instance, does he even have a main? Not that I've ever seen, but I'll bet I could beat him if he had one. This game really has three separate tiers of competitors already:
1. Those that don't use MK on any level and excel with a character to moderate success against the members of the same group.
2. Those that have tried this, hit a wall, and decided that MK could be used to trump players that are better than them in the first group.
3. And players who have dropped their other characters entirely to raise their MK above those of the second group and compete with others of group 3.
In reality nothing is stopping any random person from being an MK pro then their own sense of enjoyment of the game / metal objection to using MK. At higher levels of play it comes down to who has the least shame to win the MK pissing contest. The individuals who are the most willing to throw away game enjoyment or sense of dignity gain an edge on those who feel fine using the characters they like to. You could make the argument that if they want the wins more they deserve them more, and should be able to use whatever means they wish to gain those wins. But do I personally want to play a game where skill can be trumped by pure desire and ruthlessness? This is like playing a game of Stratego where it's perfectly acceptable for a person to bludgeon the other competitor with a ball peen hammer mid-game. Sure I COULD just use the hammer as well, but I don't really WANT to play a game where all you have to do is be more cold-blooded than the opponent if I don't have to. I like to play Stratego, not hammer wars, but if such a game did exist I guarantee the Grand Finals would be two guys throwing the board to one side, grabbing two hammers and whaling on each other. Same goes for Brawl. Though you could just say "Tough, deal with it. Other people seem to deal with the bludgeoning just fine and still win." I don't think I should have to. I came to play and see others play a thinking game, not be the biggest b*****d they can be.
In summary: Hammer free bracket please? I'm tired of the threat of brain damage.