Ah, that makes sense.
And I recall you saying something like that, but my head hurts, so I'll check later.
You have strange ways of payment, Agi.
(I didn't take it personal, btw, just wondering if I made you upset or something.)
Anyways, let me rant about Dr. Nickel Q. Pumpkin:
Here are many problems with Dr. Nickel Q. Pumpkin, Esq.'s perceptions. The one that's the most blatant, and the one that I will limit my discussion to, is related to his overt support of authoritarianism. In the text that follows, I don't intend to recount all of the damage caused by Dr. Pumpkin's unpatriotic pleas but I do want to point out that the best thing about Dr. Pumpkin is the way that he encourages us to put an end to judgmental solecism. No, wait; Dr. Pumpkin doesn't encourage that. On the contrary, he discourages us from admitting that I'm at loggerheads with him on at least one important issue. Namely, Dr. Pumpkin argues that without his superior guidance, we will go nowhere. I take the opposite position, that it is our responsibility to ensure that Dr. Pumpkin doesn't convict me without trial, jury, or reading one complete paragraph of this letter. Get that straight, please. Any other thinking is blame-shoving or responsibility-dodging.
Thank you for listening.