Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I count Snake's cut as a bad point. When I say Snake being cut is OK, it is not because it is good, Snake's cut always results in a bad point. Even when I say "Snake would be good but he is understandable for a cut", Snake's cut is still present as a bad point, the good part is not Snake being cut, it is the one who cut Snake trying to avoid the cuts. Sometimes, I don't post every single bad thing or every single good thing, because I want to post the same number of good and bad things for reasons I explained Pacack before.I don't get why you say for one roster like Snake is okay as a cut while you would still like to see him again and for another roster you point the Snake cut as a bad one while saying the same. It would be nice if you could at least threat the same argument the same way in both cases. You should know if you want any cut to be pointed out as a bad one or if you were fine by tolerating the cut. I hope you get the point I mean
Retro series is characters that come from old NES ad other old console games. Like the Ice Climbers. Obscure/historical are characters that are important to Nintendo and may not have originated from video-games. An example of that is Daitoryo. He never appeared in a game but is important to Nintendo as he represents the very start of it before it was making games. R.O.B. is another example of obscure/historical character.
Just want to chirp in; the defining characteristic of R.O.B. and Mr. Game and Watch is that they represent a period in Nintendo's history; not that they are "hardware" characters. Also, the historical character has been obscure both times, so that's one thing you need to watch out for.
Just a quick reply to this, I don't intend (nor do I want to) to derail this thread.
But it's not obscure, which is a big thing about those two characters.
However looking at Nintendoland games, his franchise is represented in this Nintendo game featuring many series so he is also now again in some way important and I guess that's what makes Takamaru more likely than others.
Yeah I prefer Ballon Fighter, Mach Rider and Excitebiker over him.
He brings quite new things to the table as being a samurai summoning flaming fireballs. His game is an underrated classic at the level of Kid Icarus and Metroid, and was considered if Takamaru had a new game. (In which he did in Nintendoland)
I count her as obscure/historical. She is my favorite in this category.
Ballon Fighter brings a lot of new things. He could have a unique gimmick with his ballons, having better jumping but worse speed when he has more ballons, when he has no ballons he is fast but has weak jumps. A stat-altering character would be cool. He also is at the level of Ice Climbers and has a minigame in Nintendo Land too.
It's probably his time now to be with Takamaru, but people are saying Villager's recovery deconfirms it. And there's not much discussion about it unlike Toad.
I don't think a reference to Ballon Fighter in Villager's moveset is that much. Mario has a Wario costume despite Wario being playable anyaway.
Who knows, Sakurai could be fooling us here, as he has tons of potential with the gimmick of air control.
Nazo no murasame-jo was supposed to be a parallel series to zelda, similar to kid icarus - metroid.
Ballon Fighter > Bomberman > Tingle > Alice > Hello Kitty
You can't put Ballon Fighter/Villager on the same level as Mario/Wario, sorry but that would be ridiculous. We don't speek of a costume the Villager could have being a reference to Ballon Fighter. The most unique move of Ballon Fighter(the only move I can figure out for Ballon Fighter anyways) is part of the Villagers moveset. Mario in Wario costume was still Mario and had no single Wario-typical move. If you want to bring arguments, please think of examples that are at least reasonable.
I post the same amount of positive and negative points because I dont want to spoil the score everyone got. If I post 3 negative and 0 positive points for someone and 3 positive and 0 negative ones for another one the another one knows that he will win. This makes everyone think "I won?. If I posted all the positive and negative points the one who has more positives and less negatives will be like "Yeah I won" before I announce the winner. Also I won't be the judge in the next rounds. The one who wins judges the next round.By the way:
I know that you won't change your way of judging for this round, but for the next rounds: Wouldn't it be better to list all the positive and negative points without trying to get a 2:2 balance? I mean you have your criteria and if there are more things you can't really imagine, why don't list them all. Same goes for a roster where you like most things and still have to put somehow two negative points in. I mean if you're totally fine with the roster, there's no problem in my opinion to put only one or even no negative point in if you can't see a real problem. I hope in the next judging rounds this can be done the way all negative and positive points are listed. Just my two points to make
Vaati right?Oh boy, the two negatives you put on mine are probably the some of the only characters I won't remove with one being my favorite
Posted it!
I don't think he is unlikely. I think he is the most likely cut, but still has good chances of returning.
Yeah I's rather have Pac-Man but I just dislike cuts.
I wanted a perfect rectangle.
Ah I understand but I was not judging appearance anyway.
