ylink_underestimted
Smash Ace
what? being another Link clone is what should be avoided. thats y i was being sarcastic...
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
fine let me rephrase "another Link clone": being a Link clone again XD"Another" Link clone? As far as I'm concerned, he'll be the only one in Brawl. =P
But really, I don't see why everyone wants originality for originality's sake. Don't fix what isn't broken. Wind Waker Link used bombs, arrows, and so on. He had a completely different sword-fighting style, though. Why not start there if you want the character to be more different than he already is?
And if you do come up with other moves, at least make them... sensible.
A while ago, someone came up with a moveset that made WWLink use a lamp for the bair and a fishing rod for a fair or something like that. All sorts of random things. So why doesn't he use the lamp on the ground and only to hit behind himself, why use the rod in the air only...
Point is, this kid ain't Mr Game&Watch.
NO! He's not Young Link. That's the point.Or, just call him Young Link....
Good point. Except he wasn't YL in ALttP.yea, but calling him Hero of Winds reps the "Celda" series. Young Link makes me think more of Ocarina of Time and A Link to the Past (and all the other games he was in) more than the Celda series....but thats IMO
So true! How about that one move where he spins around with the sword out? Or maybe some weird leaf instead.I think young link should use some kind of sword, maybe some bombs...a boomerang of some sort...Ooh, definetly a Bow!
That's also true. In TMC, he's not the Hero of Winds. Nor is he (they) the Hero of Winds in FSA. However, if there were to be a cel-shaded Link in Brawl, it would most likely be the version from Wind Waker. That was the biggest and best cel-shaded LoZ adventure, and offers the most choice IMO. Hero of Winds FTW....I don't see that. "Hero of Winds" is specific to Wind Waker. It's not like all the other cell-shaded Links are Heroes of Wind, right?
"Young Link" actually seems to fit quite well in that respect because it's turned into the style for all the new younger incarnations of Link.
Yeah. No more clones in Brawl!what? being another Link clone is what should be avoided. thats y i was being sarcastic...
NO!Hey why don't you make all his B moves sword moves? like his helm splitter and such that would be different.
Yeah, I have to agree there. The grappling hook should totally be his Z, and the leaf should be his uB. Give him Ice Arrows, and modify the boomerang to make it more like it was in WW--for example, once it hits someone, you can tilt the control stick to change the direction it flies in; this can be done five times. And for the bombs...well, they're bombs. What can you do?That would make him a tiny Marth. *scratches head*
I think the one B move that could really be replaced is the up-b. The spin attack could easily be turned into a smash and an aerial move, up-b could be the leaf, and together with the grapple hook, that makes for a nifty recovery.
Who cares what they said? There's no way he would not have Link in his name.ylink_underestimted
Actually, most people earlier here said Hero of Winds was the best name for him.
So? It was originally used in Wind Waker.ylink_underestimted
His name isnt really going to be Wind Waker Link, cuz the cel-shadedness was in other games for LoZ too.
I can almost guarantee you that they won't call him that. That's about as likely as them calling him Howdy Doody Link.ylink_underestimted
Hero of Winds would be the likely choice IMO
thats done, SAMUS=ZAMUSI really hope WW Link isn't in Brawl. I played Wind Waker, I like his art style.
The last thing we need is two of the same character in the game. I don't care if they have different moves, I don't care if they're technically not the same character. A new version of an established character takes a spot from a more deserving, more unique character.
There also seems to be a double standard. People are all over having 2 Links in the game, but when people want, for example, another Pokemon Trainer they get shot down almost instantly. Not that I support another PT, I don't.
Hell, I'd rather have Tingle than WW Link.
They don't have seperate selections though so it doesn't countthats done, SAMUS=ZAMUS
Tingle was a d*** in WW...XD
@Twilight: well in ALttP, he had the same childish scream. *Ylink screams* thats y...
n the "Celda" thing, i got it from Kabyk-Greenmyst XD
the all swords for B's...no. Fawriel's right. itd make him another Marth...having the Parry moves wouldnt be too bad tho...vB is good with its Bombs, but for the sake of originality, if it were to be changed, well the ideas are weird (including mine...)
so? they are still the same character. its like saving a spot in the selections, cuz they would have different attacks. CS Link would just be there but in his own spot, because Link's FS wont turn into because they still arent the same character.They don't have seperate selections though so it doesn't count
(Sorry...Double Post)
thats wut some of us are trying to do: de-clone. wut makes him non-original tho? n wuts wrong with Paper Mario? even tho im neutral about it, he would still be different from Mario (he turns into a d*** plane)No. WW link is a horrible idea. As annoying as he was, i would rather have Y. link. The WW link idea is as bad as the Paper Mario idea. "Hammer + new moveset! YAY." Seriously, come up with original - non clone characters.
Maybe not in movesets.I cannot stress how much Wind Waker Link will not be a clone!
We're not talking about the dictionary definition. When talking about Smash Bros. if somebody refers to a character as a "Clone" it is ALWAYS because they share a virtually identical special moveset, ie. Captain Falcon and Ganondorf or Marth and Roy. Please learn your Smash lingo. Wind Waker Link has a very good chance of making it in, and there certainly isn't going to be LESS characters from Zelda in Brawl, as there were in Melee, is there?Maybe not in movesets.
But essentially, WWLink would be the same person.
What's the dictionary's definition of "clone" again?
I really hope WW Link isn't in Brawl. I played Wind Waker, I like his art style.
The last thing we need is two of the same character in the game. I don't care if they have different moves, I don't care if they're technically not the same character. A new version of an established character takes a spot from a more deserving, more unique character.
There also seems to be a double standard. People are all over having 2 Links in the game, but when people want, for example, another Pokemon Trainer they get shot down almost instantly. Not that I support another PT, I don't.
Hell, I'd rather have Tingle than WW Link.
About the names:Who cares what they said? There's no way he would not have Link in his name.
So? It was originally used in Wind Waker.
I can almost guarantee you that they won't call him that. That's about as likely as them calling him Howdy Doody Link.
The way I see it, there are 4 possible names for this character:
1.Young Link
2.Wind Waker Link
3.Wind Link
4.Wind Hero Link
I'm willing to be anyone that if this version of Link appears in Brawl, he will have one of those 4 names.
That was only the GBA version, I think. Not the original. If you read the maual, he's like 14 or something.thats done, SAMUS=ZAMUS
Tingle was a d*** in WW...XD
@Twilight: well in ALttP, he had the same childish scream. *Ylink screams* thats y...
n the "Celda" thing, i got it from Kabyk-Greenmyst XD
the all swords for B's...no. Fawriel's right. itd make him another Marth...having the Parry moves wouldnt be too bad tho...vB is good with its Bombs, but for the sake of originality, if it were to be changed, well the ideas are weird (including mine...)
EDIT: Freeman: well for one, stop sounding like u know whats definitelys going to be in Brawl: anything can happen.
who cares? well people thought it was a good idea. it was even in the first page (well actually he said "hero of time", but he was going for something like hero of winds)
fine then. we'll call him WIND WAKER SUIT LINK". it was a good idea so just chill...
First off, don't insult the awesome kid in the awesome green suit with the awesome conical hat that I awesomely main. Second, CSL is a great idea. Third, so is Paper Mario. Fourth...No. WW link is a horrible idea. As annoying as he was, i would rather have Y. link. The WW link idea is as bad as the Paper Mario idea. "Hammer + new moveset! YAY." Seriously, come up with original - non clone characters.
Thank you, Fawriel. I hope you live a long happy life and go to heaven. Or some crap like that.I guess I understand where some of the haters are coming from. In a way, it's another Link indeed, while there could be Midna or someone instead, who is completely and utterly a different person.
But in my eyes, WW Link is almost as much a different person, as his personality is another one entirely, which is what I think matters. You have one mature, calm, kinda dreamy hero guy with a detailed, semi-realistic art-style with subdued color scheme that resembles water colors, and a bouncy, chipper and curious kid with a terribly expressive face and a cell-shaded art style. If they didn't wear a similar outfit and their position wasn't pretty much the same, you'd think them different characters.
I guess in the end, it all depends on how many characters you think there'll be and how much you fear for other characters you hope for. I don't doubt that we'll still get Midna if Sakurai deems her a good idea, for example, and I do doubt very much that we'll get the WW Link character update with a note saying "I actually wanted to add Sonic, but I decided to go with this little guy instead because the young Link of Melee was such a popular character. Isn't he just lovable?"
That's true. Thankfully, I don't have to yell quite as much now. At you, anyway.I don't think that there will be any clones like there were in Melee. The closest thing we'll see to clones in this game, IMO, are people like Luigi. If WW Link gets in, I think he'll be as different from Link as Luigi is from Mario. He won't be a clone, but he won't be completely different either.
NO! HE WOULD NOT! CSL is NOT the same as the Twilight Princess version of Link who is appearing in Brawl!Maybe not in movesets.
But essentially, WWLink would be the same person.
What's the dictionary's definition of "clone" again?
Here's this site's definition of clone:http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/clone said:a cell, cell product, or organism that is genetically identical to the unit or individual from which it was derived.
So you can't say that WWLink and regular link would be the same as Samus and Zero Suit Samus...First, you can't select Zero Suit Samus...Second, they count as 1 character, since they are the same character....so? they are still the same character. its like saving a spot in the selections, cuz they would have different attacks. CS Link would just be there but in his own spot, because Link's FS wont turn into because they still arent the same character.
thats wut some of us are trying to do: de-clone. wut makes him non-original tho? n wuts wrong with Paper Mario? even tho im neutral about it, he would still be different from Mario (he turns into a d*** plane)
They shouldn't count as different characters and by all technicallity...don'tThat still doesnt change the fact that CS Link and Link are different characters. You couldnt select Sheik in Melee(aside from Holding A, which doesnt count), but she/it still counted as a different character: you generally had to choose Zelda and use vB. Well, you have to use Samus' FS to be Zamus, thus being different(same person, different CHARACTER). Besides, PT isnt technically one character. CS Link and Link are still different characters in both ways: different people, different characters. Samus and Zamus were brought up to point out that there are already two of the same character, even tho CS Link and Link arent.
Ah, gotcha. That's actually funny, now that I know what it means.Twilight: i shouldve put [/sarcasm] at the end...this is the reason i said that tho: people kept saying "Wind Waker Link" was going to be his name because its origin of style came from the game Wind Waker, which of course is the obvious reason why that should be his name ([/sarcasm] XD). Well, seeing as Zamus got her style from Metroid: Zero Mission, her name in Brawl became Zero Suit Samus. get me? yea...i was just trying to make a point...
Who are the same character? If you're saying CSL and TPLink are the same, you're wrong. If you're talking about Samus and Zamus, you're still wrong. They're not the same character...they're the same person, like ylink said. They're different characters though.So you can't say that WWLink and regular link would be the same as Samus and Zero Suit Samus...First, you can't select Zero Suit Samus...Second, they count as 1 character, since they are the same character....
You're right, ylink (or should I call you underestimted? Nah, I'll stick with ylink, 'cause it's shorter). Zelda and Sheik took up two pages in the Player's Guide--Zelda on one, Sheik on the next. That's how it'll be with Samus and Zamus, Psycho. They're different characters, but the same person.That still doesnt change the fact that CS Link and Link are different characters. You couldnt select Sheik in Melee(aside from Holding A, which doesnt count), but she/it still counted as a different character: you generally had to choose Zelda and use vB. Well, you have to use Samus' FS to be Zamus, thus being different(same person, different CHARACTER). Besides, PT isnt technically one character. CS Link and Link are still different characters in both ways: different people, different characters. Samus and Zamus were brought up to point out that there are already two of the same character, even tho CS Link and Link arent.
Zelda and Sheik? Different characters, same person. Zamus and Samus? Same thing. Link and Young Link? Same thing (they're just in, you know, different stages of their life). However: TPL and CSL? Two very, very different characters...and people.They shouldn't count as different characters and by all technicallity...don't
that was only because people used Shiek instead of Zelda in tournaments and never switched to Zelda and the fact they have different movesets...
Since Zero Suit Samus most likely won't be in tournaments due to her status...and the fact she IS Samus and the only way to get her is using her final Smash...It doesn't count as the same thing...
your talking about seperate characters with serperate movesets taking up a space on the select screen...Transformation characters won't take up spaces on the select screen so that doesn't count
I believe WWLInk will most likely be in...I'm just saying they aren't the same thing
Ah, gotcha. That's actually funny, now that I know what it means.
Who are the same character? If you're saying CSL and TPLink are the same, you're wrong. If you're talking about Samus and Zamus, you're still wrong. They're not the same character...they're the same person, like ylink said. They're different characters though.
You're right, ylink (or should I call you underestimted? Nah, I'll stick with ylink, 'cause it's shorter). Zelda and Sheik took up two pages in the Player's Guide--Zelda on one, Sheik on the next. That's how it'll be with Samus and Zamus, Psycho. They're different characters, but the same person.
Zelda and Sheik? Different characters, same person. Zamus and Samus? Same thing. Link and Young Link? Same thing (they're just in, you know, different stages of their life). However: TPL and CSL? Two very, very different characters...and people.
TPL is an older, more responsible man who works on a ranch and is good with kids. They look up to him for guidance, come to him with problems, and generally want to be around him. He obviously has a crush on Ilia. He lives a relaxing life near the forest of Ordon.
CSL, however (let's base this off WW), is a young boy who lives on the island of Outset. He has no responsibilities at all, and lives a carefree life with his grandmother and sister. He knows the kids and plays with them, and has no interest in girls at all.
Not to mention the fact that they're from two very different games and have very different adventures with the very different storylines and very different items. CSL=/=young TPL. CSL=his own d@mn, kick@$$ character.
...Just like TPL.
Link and Young Link are the same person, but not the same character. They are both Link (the same Link in this case, which is why TPL and CSL aren't the same person), but they have different movesets, so they are different characters. I'm pretty sure that's what ylink is getting at.I was talking about he shouldn't compare 2 different characters on the select screen to transformation characters...What's the difference between character and person?
i only brought the 2 up because some CSL haters say there shouldnt be two Links(some are referring CSL to being a Link clone if u will). so i was just trying to say that there are already 2 Samus'...then me n Psycho got into a little quarrel about comparing the Links and Samus'...I was talking about he shouldn't compare 2 different characters on the select screen to transformation characters...What's the difference between character and person?
pretty much wut i was trying to say...oh yea just call me ylink. underestimated is fine tho (ive been called that a few times). or u could call me by my "gamer" name: Pare`(d*** how do u put the little accent over the E?)Link and Young Link are the same person, but not the same character. They are both Link (the same Link in this case, which is why TPL and CSL aren't the same person), but they have different movesets, so they are different characters. I'm pretty sure that's what ylink is getting at.
WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG The timeline (IMO goes like this)As far as I remember from reading it on a site a long time ago, this is the timeline:
<----OoT--MM-------TP--------------------------------------WW----------------->
OH yea, you're right. I forgot TP was before OoT, silly me.
I know they should be split, but for my argument, it was the timeline of the places the games take in that I was referring to.