yeah but the sheik's have gimpyfish on their side so whats zelda gonna do LOL
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
sad but true.... such massive topics like the Zelda picture thread exist there.... also... the threads that ARE useful seem to have far more useless posts than the sheik boards take to accomplish the same ends. The truth is... the shiek boards dot he charcter board thing better. The zelda board does not seem to have as many useful posts in it... and not as much focuses on what's important.... now.... at least it isn't hampered down with AT after AT with little concern on the important aspects of the meta-game like the pit boards, but it doesn't have much of either really.The post counter wishes to disagree with you, unless you are saying that the 5,000+ extra post in the Zelda forum has over the Sheik forum is not for the most part aimed to improve her Meta game.
AT's are nice... but they don't necessarily make or break a charcter.... look at MK for example... he doesn't really use ATsThe fact is if there was somewhere to improve then someone in the Zelda community would be already striving toward improving it but because of her limited combo potential and fairly inflexible move set while at the same time only really having "love jumping" and her up B cancel at the edge advance techs to speak of you really have nothing left to work on besides spacing and style.
what's unny... is that you listed 3 characters who actuallly don't have an advantage on zelda... not that there aren't characters who do... those are just the wrong ones.zelda has kill moves.
zelda's only bad against characters than can get in on her, like fox, diddy, and mk. other than that she's twice as good as sheik. more options, more power, huge disjointed multiple hitboxes, more range, more spam, less you can do about it.
hmm... looking at this yes... I suppose that's true.... but MK is not one of her worst matchups or even close really. And while he never said those were her WORST matchups I suppose. Fox and diddy aren't anything tougher than even and MetaKnight really is not a bad matchup at all... it's not fun, but it's not bad.Meta Knight not having an advantage on Zelda is a silly notion. It's not a heavy counter matchup, but it's not an even one, either.
Listing Diddy as a character Zelda is bad against is lol, though.
a lot of zelda players are idiots... I'm not suggesting that the ones that you play are, but a lot of Zelda users seem to think that they should just din's fire camp and wait for the enemy to come to them because of her great range and how hard she is to get inside...I don't know, it just seems to me Hedgehawg, that Zelda is too inflexible. If you have experience against Zelda's and know to wait just outside of their attack zone, then Zelda can't really do much. The reason people thought Zelda was so good before now was because of her general wtfsmashes and aerials, but we're past that stage now and it's becoming more and more obvious that if you play smart against a Zelda you're going to win. If you don't play rushdown against Zelda and make stupid mistakes, and FORCE her to approach, she's no problem.
Feel free to debate me on this as I dont claim to be as knowledgeable about Zelda as you, but from my own experience against Zelda players that's what I've seen.
<_< you are aware that all of the good zeldas play at least somewhat agressively. it's only the n00bs who camp with her.Playing aggressively with Zelda gives a novelty effect but isn't very good in the long run - everything you can do can be beaten by the strategy of "camp and either shield or roll away if she approaches." Zelda simply doesn't have the speed or maneuverability to play aggressively against patient people who are aware of Zelda's range and power.
As far as I've seen, playing actively aggressively doesn't work in this game. Well, not anywhere that matters, anyway.Well, the truth is: Zelda is best if played more agressively.
DarkMusician probably has one of the most aggressive styles i've seen since Brawl came out, and he certainly has no problems."Somewhat?" All you said was
As far as I've seen, playing actively aggressively doesn't work in this game. Well, not anywhere that matters, anyway.
Yes.DarkMusician probably has one of the most aggressive styles i've seen since Brawl came out, and he certainly has no problems.
I'm still amazed by how people see Zelda even now. She is not slow, granted she doesn't have blazing speed but with dsmash, dtilt, naryus, and nair auto canceling you can actually be fairly quick with her. All of her smashes come out pretty quick and the lag isn't too bad. I think most of the Sheik mains don't realize how good Zelda can be. They get frustrated using her because they only switch for the kill. Your opponent knows your going for the kill so they play defensive while you sit there using smashes. I really think as Zelda you need to pressure your opponent at all times.
Something we're currently discussing on the Zelda boards is how useful empty short hopping can be. If your approaching through the air, your opponent is going to be thinking lightning kick and this can lead to some nice grab setups or shield poking. This can actually be used as a sort of approach, knowing how limited her approach options are.
My Zelda has been called good and scary be a good number of people now and I still think she sucks. I know of her offensive options and I know of her defensive options very well. I've also play her a good amount in singles just so I can keep my skills fresh with her but it doesn't change the fact that she is limited and when compared to sheik simplistic.Yes.
I don't want to come off as offensive, but, honestly, the reason that a lot of sheik mains say zelda isn't good is because they can't play her well. Zelda's gonna suck unless you put some work into her. you may say "zelda needs to play defensively to do best" but that's only because that's the way that's working best for you because it's the easiest to get down and you don't really understand her offensive game. it's there. trust me, it is.
It frustrates us zelda mains to no end to see sheik users calling themselves "Zelda/Sheik" users who are, essentially, good sheiks who switch to zelda, lose all their momentum by spamming Fsmash and Usmash and praying that their foe will be dumb enough to walk into it. A applaud you guys for deciding to branch out into the dual maining category, but if you truly want to be a frightening force, you gotta put work into zelda beyond just trying to KO with her... you have to know her inside and out and just play with her. it's okay to bring her out for a KO... but you have to know how to play as her once she's out so that she can hold her own until a KO opportunity presents itself.
Zelda is simplistic and no you really can't. You can try but if your opponent is defensive, has a good range attack and has some speed(in other words more then half the cast) too them you will struggle greatly trying to play a aggressive style with ZeldaMatch 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBcoT2SpJgY&fmt=18
Match 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jtcff0Xmni4&fmt=18
Match 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tg-2JssmAzg&fmt=18
Watch these three videos and then tell me if you think Zelda's "simplistic". You can play an aggressive style with Zelda and it can be effective.
Quoted for truth.because its boring and stale after 3 matches lol
You thought that b-reversal to a spike in the third vid was boring?because its boring and stale after 3 matches lol
I meant in terms of effectiveness ;pbecause its boring and stale after 3 matches lol