Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Could you.. explain how they're not particularly hard? That doesn't make sense lol. They're literally designed to be difficult, and you (presumably) not having issues with the series' trademark difficulty does not make it any less challenging.
Can I have some sauce with that pasta? I find that highly unlikely given that we haven't had a third version in six years.
I believe in Emily Rogers, Eurogamer and Laura Kate Dale. That's all we have, but they're on point on the latest Switch rumours and got almost everything right until now. And just because TPC haven't made a third version for their Pokémon games in recent years, doesn't necessarly means they won't be doing this time.. in fact, I think that doing that, is also a throwback to allude the begining of the series, with the anniversary happening and such.
I think it is likely to get a third version for this Gen, because I think the 3DS is going to be on it's way out when the Switch is released. If it is not a third version then it would have to just be a port of Sun and Moon, but I don't think Nintendo/Game Freak would be that dumb to miss the opportunity to get more sales out of a third version than just porting the games we already have and leaving a lot of people who already got the game on the 3DS just deciding to not buy it.
To be fair, Nintendo tried to evolve the series into more of a single-player adventure game with Adventures and Assault. IMO Assault was a step in the right direction, Namco must have realized that they needed more than just the arcadey space shooting if they wanted to keep the series around. Its a real shame that so many people had so many mixed feelings on it.
I feel this is exactly why.
It wouldn't work as a $60 title in this market, at least.
Did Nintendo have full legal rights to take down AM2R? Yes, absolutely.
Yep, Nintendo were the ones stealing here. Not the (admittedly well-meaning) fans who took a game currently being sold and made an unlicensed free remake.
I never said Nintendo stole anything. As a matter of fact, I agree with you that they were well within their legal rights to take the game down.
More like inb4 "but Valve." Remember the time a group of fans remade the first Half-Life and Valve was totally down with that?
So because two are third party companies... Nintendo doesn't have to act like them??
...Yeah. Pretty much. Nintendo shouldn't be endorsing unofficial remakes on unofficially supported platforms.
So had AM2R and Pokemon Uranium been released as homebrew Wii U games then Nintendo taking them down would suddenly be a bad thing to you?
This. This is what always gets me when it comes to Sonic Adventure 2. IMO, SA2 has aged much, much better than people give it credit for. It's just that its a Sonic game, and in this day and age you're supposed to laugh at Sonic. Because of this, people are much more critical towards this game than they are towards other older games that don't hold up that well.
Inferior quality or not, Mario is the face of Nintendo and a higher-selling series than DKC, so it at least makes sense that the former is a higher priority.
There are people who have a problem with that? The Wii U didn't sell well and it had a lot of very good games, so it would only make sense if they port the best games from the Wii U to a console that seems like it is going to be a lot more successful.
Probably because for the first few years of the PS4's life most of its "big games" were just tuned up ports of PS3 games. Hell, I'm still willing to say that the console tries to sell itself on them. For a lot of us, we'd rather play new games than old ones running on better tech.
I don't really mind if old games get ported as long as there is a fair amount of new games as well. I am starting to get tired of seeing ports of older games though, and seeing so many just makes me wish more consoles nowadays had backwards compatibility and we could see full blown remakes for games that deserve and/or need it more often.
i know what you mean but i still think its a good game
I kind of feel this way about Mega Man 7. I'm not going to commit to saying its better designed than Mega Man 2, entirely on the basis that I haven't touched a Mega Man game in years, but I thought it was a fun game. I not entire sure the MM community decided to point to 7 and say, "Yep, this is the bad one."
MM7 is fun, but had its issues. Movement felt a bit weird, have that in conjunction of zoomed in screen to show off the new sprites (then they zoomed out for MM8 later). Charge shot was fairly weak in this game iirc, so the incentive to charge wasn't as huge imo. I wasn't a huge fan of splitting up the robot master select screen to 4 and 4 without the use of a password. Felt like MM7 and 8 shouldn't have simplified it in such a way. I think Mega Man & Bass did a much better job on it since they did it with split paths which was cool. Plus the weapons in the latter half of MM7 felt kind of weak for me.
Thunder Beam's amazing with the pause trick. Outside of that, while it's a powerful weapon, it uses up too much weapon energy so you can't use it often. I didn't find Metal Blades broken, just extremely versatile in stages which makes it better than Thunder Beam in my book.
