Gyrom8
Smash Champion
The think with Pokemon fakes vs leaks is that they're a lot easier to pass off as real than Smash leaks. All it requires is someone able to draw and mimic Pokemon's style and voila, here's your concept art. By contrast, people expect Smash leaks to show screenshots of the game, which it's much harder to make it look genuine. For Pokemon, you just need art of a new creature which could be real. For Smash, you gotta convince people that an already existing character is joining the cast. The key issue here being that people can easily find if you've used an existing render. while Pokemon can't so easily be disproven.> Me: *logs in*
> Me: *has 8 notifications*
> Me: Wow, did I get a lot of likes?!
> Me: *checks notifications and find that it is just quotes, not a single like that I was hoping for*
> Me: ..........
In all seriousness, thanks for your replies. I'm sorry, I don't think the tweet I linked a while ago is real, but I could be wrong in that way. Remember when Sun and Moon starter's final evolution leaked way early? They called the evolutions fake, and guess what, it was 100% real.
Something about that, and that 'bug Pokemon' leak from days ago just rub me the wrong way, but then again, leaks about Pokemon were common even if most were fake, so.
This could all be real, but I don't really think there's much in its favour other than that
Last edited: