Pitzer
The Young Lion
But this is entertaining.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Maybe, but the last time **** went down in this thread Hylian came and locked it. I don't want that to happen again, not after all this video compiling that I've done for the past year.But this is entertaining.
I never said I was at his level. All I said is that I have a history of doing WELL vs him. This means taking games off him, and having a positive record on FD, not winning sets. Jesus.Yea, you're M2k's skill level in melee....Show me a vid of yourself if you really want to impress me.
Dude, no offense, but stop.I never said I was at his level. All I said is that I have a history of doing WELL vs him. This means taking games off him, and having a positive record on FD, not winning sets. Jesus.
You want a vid? There's like 1000+ at this point. I've been recording since 2005. There's like 10-15 in this thread for zss alone.
I haven't checked yet, but those videos might already be in the OP.Here's a few more from me if ya want. These are some hype matches:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kN4ONco4Yk - vs. DarkBlues(Win)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeZxOLoqgF4 - vs. StereoKiDD(Win)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgzxC-95flM - vs. Gallo(Lose)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaWugeQkej4 - vs. Gallo(Win)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdNuBYNnlew - vs. NinjaLink(Lose)
We would love to play you .I wanna go to md/va it looks like they got a lot of interesting players definately planning on it also wanna see my main man Nazo
LOL^I searched "Vixen vs. M2K" and variants of that into YouTube, but nothing showed up. Am I missing something here? Different alias?
A crying white version of drake with big lips. o_O.Seagull joe...I'm going to try to make it out there to see this face. I'm done now Kay b.
search for RubyIris or Mizuki instead.I searched "Vixen vs. M2K" and variants of that into YouTube, but nothing showed up. Am I missing something here? Different alias?
I haven't played with M2k on a recording set up since 2011 and someone tripped over my laptop breaking my external. Lost the entire weekends worth of great sets.I searched "Vixen vs. M2K" and variants of that into YouTube, but nothing showed up. Am I missing something here? Different alias?
Power rankings would be extremely difficult on a scale of something this largeIt seems to me that the problem lies behind the fact that OP organizes this list based on:
Perhaps a power ranking system is in order? The last 2 things listed are qualitative, though I'm not really sure if KayB would reject a player if he didn't have any videos but had every other quality listed.
- Tournament standings
- Frequency of tournament attendance
- Specific win(s) against a certain player
- Biased(?) heresy
- Whether or not they have videos
Plus, a player shouldn't be in the list based on how popular he/she is or because a lot of people think they "deserve" to be on it, but that's just my opinion.
An algorithm focused on the placing you got from a large tournament would also incorporate the individual player's current score. So ya boi Emukiller's 1st place from SKTAR 3 would be held heavy, considering his competition includes most of the top ranked Project M players from Smashboards' rankings, as well as there being 256 unique entrants
Zenith 2014 had 165 unique entrants, and not as much competition (skill-wise). Even with this being true, Zero's 1st place would probably be held almost as heavy (or even higher) since Emu, M2K, Rolex, etc were all in the tournament. As well as it occurring after SKTAR, so Emu would be more of a "threat". In other words, Zenith was stacked. SKTAR was stacked too, but that was after the first half of entrants were knocked out (arguable).
If we start using a system like this, you could actually see what it means to you and "how good you are with X character" if you beat Mew2King. Also, this would eliminate the "I placed 1st at a tourny in X state, that means I'm the best with X character" since it would accommodate for your competition. Theres also no room for "you placed Xth SOOO LONG AGO, it doesnt count" since if a player wanted to overtake someone's spot for 1st/2nd/3rd, all they have to do earn more points, AKA, this system would reward players who enter more tournaments. You could also tie in a time variable, in which player's points diminish over time. Doing this would reward high placings, and players who've had a "bad run" need not worry since after a certain amount of time, it's like it didnt even happen.
The only problem with this system is what if a player uses multiple characters in a bracket? I wouldnt know how to allocate the points in that instance. Not only that, but I sure as hell don't know what the algorithm would be. You could just use SB's power rankings, but not everyone claims their points.
TLDR: start using a point / power ranking system
You're killing me here dude. Managing this list as it is is already stressful enough lolIt seems to me that the problem lies behind the fact that OP organizes this list based on:
Perhaps a power ranking system is in order? The last 2 things listed are qualitative, though I'm not really sure if KayB would reject a player if he didn't have any videos but had every other quality listed.
- Tournament standings
- Frequency of tournament attendance
- Specific win(s) against a certain player
- Biased(?) heresy
- Whether or not they have videos
Plus, a player shouldn't be in the list based on how popular he/she is or because a lot of people think they "deserve" to be on it, but that's just my opinion.
An algorithm focused on the placing you got from a large tournament would also incorporate the individual player's current score. So ya boi Emukiller's 1st place from SKTAR 3 would be held heavy, considering his competition includes most of the top ranked Project M players from Smashboards' rankings, as well as there being 256 unique entrants
Zenith 2014 had 165 unique entrants, and not as much competition (skill-wise). Even with this being true, Zero's 1st place would probably be held almost as heavy (or even higher) since Emu, M2K, Rolex, etc were all in the tournament. As well as it occurring after SKTAR, so Emu would be more of a "threat". In other words, Zenith was stacked. SKTAR was stacked too, but that was after the first half of entrants were knocked out (arguable).
If we start using a system like this, you could actually see what it means to you and "how good you are with X character" if you beat Mew2King. Also, this would eliminate the "I placed 1st at a tourny in X state, that means I'm the best with X character" since it would accommodate for your competition. Theres also no room for "you placed Xth SOOO LONG AGO, it doesnt count" since if a player wanted to overtake someone's spot for 1st/2nd/3rd, all they have to do earn more points, AKA, this system would reward players who enter more tournaments. You could also tie in a time variable, in which player's points diminish over time. Doing this would reward high placings, and players who've had a "bad run" need not worry since after a certain amount of time, it's like it didnt even happen.
The only problem with this system is what if a player uses multiple characters in a bracket? I wouldnt know how to allocate the points in that instance. Not only that, but I sure as hell don't know what the algorithm would be. You could just use SB's power rankings, but not everyone claims their points.
TLDR: start using a point / power ranking system
I drove M2k yesterday from the airport. He has no clue who you are.I haven't played with M2k on a recording set up since 2011 and someone tripped over my laptop breaking my external. Lost the entire weekends worth of great sets.
Maybe it's SC? I'll have to do more research in that...Wtf reflex lives in NC? I don't think he ever comes out.. Is that actually real, or a typeo?