I'll humor you. I'm in a humourous "2 hours of sleep" mood."
The direction I'm feeling is Soup. I have concerns about him when I replace in, and he just tries to swat my questions away by saying that my catch up is townie. His 're-consideration' tells me that he didn't really read the catch up at all. His reasoning for his 'weird' stance on me is weak, as well. I think it's him trying to make up reasoning for a certain degree of dislike. I think that if Soup were town, he would have poked me/ask me questions right away, not just let a wagon go and not do anything about anyone else until the next day, like a line up. I also feel his answer to my questions are very lacking. For example, he just stated the same thing, when he didn't really answer my questions.
When you ask a question, you're either looking for answer or you don't understand something. The questions you asked about Pre-game meant absolutely nothing. The answer I gave you before would be the same answer I would give you now. I was trying to play a persona and I was excited for the game. It didn't really work in my favor and I dropped it.
Let me ask you a question: Where is the actual reasoning and depth to this dislike of me? You're using frail statements and inconclusive evidence such as me "make up reasoning for a certain degree of dislike." I wasn't making it up and there's an intention to read you. I don't have a truly strong stance on you and the reconsideration is bluntly pointed out. I can't trust Meta and I can't trust typical Ranmaru-tells because if I did that, then I would be playing like you are now. Need me to requote? Need me to restate?
Let me ask you
another question. Why are these things not clear to you, and why are you assuming that if something isn't clear to you or you don't understand it, then that reasoning is somehow invisible therefore made up? This is lazy. You're being lazy and on top of it you're being vague. I'm not saying you need to bust out a case point-by-point, but you need to be more clear. This is why I dislike you this game. You're slipping and it concerns and frustrates me.
This is why I reconsidered you. You go out of your way to do things, yet they seem completely artificial. Where is the substance? Where is the conclusions? Where is the..anything?
Let's get to the finer points as to why your post is horrible.
"I think if soup were town..."
I think? I think your post sucks. Does that make me right? Maybe. Everything is subjective.
"He would have done X instead of Y..."
That's all this is. I didn't do what you thought I would do and it bothers you. It's true that players may act differently dependent on alignment, but I'm not a sucker and I know how to play scum. I have two gold dice because of it. Slipping up because of an inconsistency isn't my style, and even then, why is your point so damning in the first place? My scum intention, again?
"not just let a wagon go and not do anything about anyone else until the next day, like a line up."
You're talking about Gheb? What? He self-hammered and we decided he was the lynch. I didn't have an issue with you. Why are you trying to imply that I did and that I was just letting a wagon go? I even did work for that lynch.
" also feel his answer to my questions are very lacking. For example, he just stated the same thing, when he didn't really answer my questions."
What is "Answer" to you? I answered. I responded. What do you want me to do, bend over backwards and do everything that you expect me to do? No. Nobody will do that. Not a single player will play
exactly like you expect them to. I don't know what you want from me or what you want me to clarify, but speak clearer for me and stop playing like a moron.