Pikmin only has bulbmins, Mushroom Pikmin, and Rock Pikmin left in terms of unique Pikmin. Mushroom Pikmin are hostile, bulbmins cannot be taken to the surface, and Rock Pikmin would work, however. I don't think that Sakurai thought of another Pikmin rep to be very unique. If you do not agree with me, then show me a moveset that is different from any other character in the game, or at least worthy of the Lucas-Ness difference.
Are we really on the "a character cannot be made unique" argument? Pikmin could be made to individually do many different things.
However, in the point above, I must not be reading you correctly, because it appears to me you claim that Lucas and Ness are different enough, even though they work from the same base (and still play differently)- it is not too difficult to imagine how Alph easily could be, just alter properties further and allow for different types of smashes. They are incredibly easy to come up with, they can literally be anything.
Or go a completely different route and have the trio as a single character instead.
Or just make it Louie instead of Alph and you have Toon Link to Link situation.
Because a) Sakurai hates cutting characters, and b) he hates cutting them for the reason that every single one has it's own fans, even the Melee clones and Dark Pit.
Sakurai has said he does not like to cut characters, and for that matter change them; this does not mean he doesn't do it. Refer to the previous games, we have a number of cut characters. The damage is done at this point.
Also:
http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/05/09/no-sequel-for-kid-icarus-uprising. By your logic, then Palutena (however her name is spelled) should not have been high-priority in this game, nor would anyone have a problem with her going in a possible future game since Sakurai is effectively declaring Kid Icarus dead.
Sakurai developed one game for Kid Icarus, and in doing so is leaving the series open for someone else to take over. He is not declaring the series dead, he is saying that as far as he knows, he will not be working on a future game.
Needless to say, he also never planned on doing Smash Bros Brawl, or Smash 4, and is saying the same about probably not doing a future Smash installment again. Even more, he did not create Kid Icarus, and someone else can take over for it. Additionally, it's only two years out from release, is still heavily on many minds, and further yet, is his baby.
However, the biggest difference is that, it is not dead. Unlike Mother, wherein the creator itself officially said there will not be a Mother 4.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/123642-Earthbound-Creator-Says-New-Sequel-is-Impossible
This is not a single developer saying he will not develop another game, this is the creator saying, "no."
Fair enough, but I must ask: how would they feel like withheld content?
How would returning veterans feel like withheld content?
Sakurai's statement alluded to fan reaction to DLC by other companies in the past, that among other obstacles of fan service, part of the difficulty was that fans felt like part of the game was held back from the disc (or locked) to only be released later as paid content.
If it is content we got for free in other installments, or as part of the disc, it certainly would feel more like it was being withheld to me, than entirely original content I have not seen before. I don't believe Sakurai held anything back, of course, but if he is worried this is the case, then simply releasing the cut veterans as DLC would certainly read as characters he saved to make the game feel as though it had the complete roster it would have otherwise had, rather than new characters he decided to embark on.
Accusing people falsely of stuff will get you attitude. I suggest you stop making false accusations entirely.
From my perspective, you've had an attitude with me this entire time. Please kindly tell me what I accused you of. If it was my 'bias' remark, you absolutely are being bias. This, of COURSE, does not mean I am not bias myself. Additionally, you may find "telling people what to do" can also come across as being not only arrogant and condescending, as does attempting to correct statements which are not incorrect in the first place, and you merely want to demonstrate that you have knowledge.
Oh, it's severely underrepped already. Popularity is not a good enough reason. So is many other series. DK, Golden Sun, and many others. Pokemon is almost perfectly repped right now. Mewtwo and one more stage gives it a great representation. Mother has been constantly called on never having its two other games released outside of Japan and has been wanted for ages. Don't act like it didn't warrant anything. it absolutely deserves its two characters and way more than it got. Pokemon got exactly what it deserved(including Mewtwo) outside of one stage.
Again, these are all your opinions. I hope you can see that they are not facts.
Some facts. Pokemon is much more than even a video game, it is an intercultural, legitimate economic study defined as phenomena.
*see "Pikachu's Global Adventure: The Rise and Fall of Pokemon" for a fascinating look into the start of what I'm referring to if you are so inclined.* Pokemon is at least 4 main Video game series with a handful of other spinoffs (Main RPG, Mystery Dungeon, Ranger, Stadium, Pinball, Coliseum, Trozei, Puzzle League, Snap, Rumble, Channel--); it is one of the longest running cartoons still on tv, it has had nearly 20 movies to go with it, a wildly popular trading card game which individuals compete on high levels (as they do with the main game as well), figurines, plush, more merchandise than you can possibly comprehend in every category from clothing to shampoo to cereal to tissues.... to pair this recognition with the success the series has had, in its ability to market to nearly any demographic, particularly when it first launched- is why it was such a revolution in through 2001, and still a hold stay today.
I don't think Mother should be barred of all representation- but I think that an o
fficially completed, almost fully localized, nearly decade old series of only 3 games... has more than enough representation in having one character. Those last points are all facts. You can believe Mother is under represented, but I believe that for a series 1/50th the size of Pokemon's empire, it is lucky to get anything at all- so many other series (Advance Wars, Golden Sun, etc) do not.
Bosses left in Brawl. They are very different actual things in Smash and are specific to Single Player(which can include Co-Op, but it's designed around one player overall) in some way. Always have been, always will be. Getting tired of misusing this term. That applies to every game in history too. Rayquaza is nothing more than a Hazard now. Pokemon does not deserve 70% of the playable character cast. Nothing does. That's beyond ridiculous and completely ignores too many series. Brawl had 39 fairly unique characters(it is not 35, even as Sakurai said himself). They got 6 characters, a very big chunk of it, which was honestly very reasonable. Out of 51, having 6 playable characters is fine, as long as other series aren't shafted. And many were. And it includes both playable and non-playable.
I don't know what you read to spur... any of this response, but I never claimed any series should have 70 percent of the roster.
My big issue with Pokemon is not it having only 6 characters, it is which six they chose, which are haphazard and, as a whole, do not represent the series. Pokemon is not an eclectic series of spontaneous monsters- or at least, it is far more than that. As I mentioned once before, Sakurai added Robin and made a claim that he fit perfectly, because now the essence of Fire Emblem was finally in Smash Bros.
With the current selection of Pokemon, the essence of Pokemon is not in the game. It is difficult to represent such a varying title in just a few characters, but there is so much to the world of pokemon, that all of the characters just being mere pokemon, standing alone, does not work. There is no synergy between the chosen characters, and it does not portray the series.
When they barely have 1/10 the content of Pokemon? Yeah, that's severely underrepresented by far.
For a series with perhaps 1/10th of the number of viable characters, 1/50 of the actual content in games, 1/80th of the number of fans, 1/500 of the amount of revenue? I don't think so. For your sake, as well as on a logical level as very few of Nintendo's IPs actually compare to the couple of monolithic titles at their forefront, I think the comparison to Pokemon is a poor one to make.
Easily. Only Ivysaur has a strong reason to come back, to represent the Grass type, a key factor in Pokemon representation. The Types clearly do matter, and are the biggest focus of how Pokemon Stadium and the character movesets are designed. Squirtle is legitimately covered right now by having another available Water Type Starter, his key role. He's almost in Young Link's position, except for having a unique moveset, his role is actually gone.
This is such utter nonsense I don't even know what to do with it anymore. The arbitrary confines which merely are descriptors of both Squirtle and Greninja, without being at all what they stand for.
Surely, if this is the quota, then Link alone must fill the quota for "link's" in a game, or Mario for "mario's", but still we have the Doctor and Toon Link in the game. What about a Ninja? We have two of those. Blue haired fire emblem swordsman? Hello Marth, Ike, and Lucina. How about Anthropomorphic Space Pilot, Fox and Falco, or Psychic little boys from Mother?
The only possible way that Greninja could even stand in as a water starter, is if there were a third starter, a grass starter, in place. Without such, both he and Charizard both just happen to be starting Pokemon, who were chosen for popularity and perceived popularity.
And Pokemon has more than enough content and already perfectly done with Mewtwo coming, save one more Stage, anyway. It's just lacking in good Grass representation among its Types. And Ivysaur does not have an easy moveset to work with, with Tether Recoveries removed for balance purposes. Squirtle is already covered well enough with Greninja, making his most notable point somewhat redundant. He may be cool on his own, but roles have played a point, whih iis why Young Link got thrown out for Toon Link.
Young Link is Toon Link, they are quite literally the same character in different art styles. Zelda and Link were updated from their Ocarina of Time look to their Twilight Princess look. Young Link was updated from his OoT look to his Windwaker design. It is the exact same character, it has nothing to do with roles. For an accurate parallelism of roles, refer above.
Mewtwo is still a Veteran no matter what. He's only "New" in the sense he cannot just be ported over from the original game. They have to recreate him, make New data. He is still a previous playable character in the end. He's still a Veteran otherwise. Once a Vet, always a Vet. That cannot ever be changed. Especially since he's pretty clearly his Melee design, and not the newer feminine Mewtwo either.
If the terms veteran and new character are opposites in this case, which is, I suppose, for an individual to decide, I will merely state- Sakurai referred to Mewtwo as a new character.
Perhaps he is getting such an overhaul that the return of the Intellectual Property was not enough to justify calling him a veteran.
Let's not pretend I don't want to see every series get a good chunk of representation. Pokemon and Mario just happened to be the only ones other than Kid Icarus who are very well repped. Arguably, Fire Emblem too. It's everything else that suffers a bit. And some don't have viable choices(Pikmin) who instead can have more Trophies, Assists, and Stages and Music. Pikmin got a big of the shaft too and could be done better. If Alts count(and they arguably do since they're almost entirely treated like their own guy in-game, although not for any specific Challenges), then Pikmin has 2, Mario has 14, Fire Emblem has 5, and Wii Fit has 2. Although Male/Female differences are easily ignorable over actually different named characters. Regardless, you get what I mean. The only issue with Fire Emblem is that it needs to really try to show off other weapons. It's otherwise fine.
I disagree on most of these fronts. You may want to see series well represented, but again, I claim, I do too. I just don't by any means think all series are created equal. No, not at all. I think nearly any character could have viable options as a fighter, and we have seen this time and time again, to the point that it's almost a silly response to read.
All that said, we are more and more veering off the point of discussing DLC. Please PM me if you feel the desire to discuss this further.