I know that but I'm still disappointed by that HyperFalcon. I mean, it's cool for Mario melee lovers since Dr-Mario seems to share a similar moveset to Mario Melee, but I was expecting the Ice Climbers or even Mewtwo to come back...That doesn't mean the game is any bad.
Ah, okay. A lot don't seem to understand that factor. I'm disappointed by the roster too. I still accept that it wouldn't have changed bar "more time" though. I'm pretty happy with the new additions too.
if Jigglypuff (my main) wasn't in the game i'd still buy it.
hell.... if the characters were all plucked from RuPaul's drag race, i'd still buy the game
but i agree the nintendo characters do make the game appealing also. but i don't think its the end of the world if every popularly requested character weren't in the game. We already have the most important ones anyways.
If any of the Original 12 are cut? No buy from me.
And get this; I'm not the only person who believes this.
The characters are the reason it sold in the first place. And how it even became what it is. It wasn't the gameplay in itself. It would've never really reached anywhere but Japan without the characters. Without the characters, we wouldn't have translated Fire Emblem games. Whether you like it or not, the characters are beyond key to this series and a major important part. The gameplay was always a secondary feature that helped.
Likewise, everybody is different on this. Some don't care about the gameplay severely and love the characters. Since the gameplay is always really good in each game regardless(Brawl was still amazing), they just want a good roster. And so far, every roster has been really great in its own right. If a character they want isn't in, no gameplay will save it unless they like that particular gameplay. If they don't? Too bad. They have every reason to ignore the game if it doesn't have the characters they want. And there is no reason to think it's not a valid way to see the series. It's not your preference, sure, but it's still something the series was outright built on.
I would be more disgusted if they were doing DLC characters and making us pay when those characters should have been in the game in the first play.
They would've been only there "in the first place" if they had time to finish them. Not just because. But anyone who was already coded into the game might as well be guaranteed free, whether Sakurai allows us to link both to unlock a second set of characters or not. He hated paid DLC as it goes against his beliefs. However, if a character is made from scratch afterwards, it may be paid DLC for both versions. But it won't be coded on either disc from the start if it's done that way. Keep in mind this only matters if Sakurai is still in charge by that time. If he leaves the particular "Smash 4" stuff and Bandai-Namco takes over, anything can change as long as Nintendo allows it at best. While it's great Sakurai is in charge, he was only asked to make the game. The second he leaves, any of his rules are null and void. We need to be prepared for crappy things to happen if he does leave the rest to Bandai-Namco.