D
Deleted member
Guest
Without hopefully having too much of a bias, heres my take on Krystal
1. How many diverse options does this character have?
About a few. Krystal can use weapons from Assault (Then again, any Star Fox member can so it wouldn't be that unique) and/or she can use her staff from Adventures which is pretty much her saving grace from being a clone.
2. Is their moves or abilities diverse from the rest of the Smash cast?
Sort of. While few of the moves may seem a little similar (For instance, the ice blaster being similar to the Ice Climber's blizzard move), she can be different enough where she doesn't have to be a clone of Fox.
3. Has the concept of the character been done before?
Nope, A character welding a staff in SSB has not been done before.
4. Does the character's abilities and moves provide enough to be entertaining?
I think so myself although its just me.
5. How visually different is the character in terms of body shape and looks?
Well Krystal stands out as being a new female face in the Star Fox universe, slightly taller than Fox, & as far as I'm aware, isn't similar looking to any character (Unless if Krystal uses her Assault appearance in that case, her suit might look similar to Zero Suit Samus as both are skin tight & blue)
6. Does it fit the character well enough?
Yes, I'd say it fits her well, the staff does belong to her after all. Fox may have used it more than her but that doesn't mean Krystal will not get it since Smash isn't canon (Just like Zelda having some of Link's moves like Din's Fire). I always imagine her being more agile & acrobatic than Fox.
Grade: B+
I will abstain from Slippy Toad.
1. How many diverse options does this character have?
About a few. Krystal can use weapons from Assault (Then again, any Star Fox member can so it wouldn't be that unique) and/or she can use her staff from Adventures which is pretty much her saving grace from being a clone.
2. Is their moves or abilities diverse from the rest of the Smash cast?
Sort of. While few of the moves may seem a little similar (For instance, the ice blaster being similar to the Ice Climber's blizzard move), she can be different enough where she doesn't have to be a clone of Fox.
3. Has the concept of the character been done before?
Nope, A character welding a staff in SSB has not been done before.
4. Does the character's abilities and moves provide enough to be entertaining?
I think so myself although its just me.
5. How visually different is the character in terms of body shape and looks?
Well Krystal stands out as being a new female face in the Star Fox universe, slightly taller than Fox, & as far as I'm aware, isn't similar looking to any character (Unless if Krystal uses her Assault appearance in that case, her suit might look similar to Zero Suit Samus as both are skin tight & blue)
6. Does it fit the character well enough?
Yes, I'd say it fits her well, the staff does belong to her after all. Fox may have used it more than her but that doesn't mean Krystal will not get it since Smash isn't canon (Just like Zelda having some of Link's moves like Din's Fire). I always imagine her being more agile & acrobatic than Fox.
Grade: B+
I will abstain from Slippy Toad.
Last edited by a moderator: