I hate the constant debates over Rosalina's portrayal in general.
Voice this, dress that, princess or not (Most definitely not! Comparing her to a princess is already blasphemy!), comparing her to Peach (Ditto!) and even boob sizes in the old thread.
Exact portrayals don't matter in the Mario series 9/10 times so debates about them, especially if repeated ad naseum are silly.
On the new topic:
I'd love to see new and unorthodox puppet fighters join the fray thanks to mods.
Ashley and Red, Pauline and Mini Mario, Ravio and his bird pal, Skull Kid and Tael, maybe even Trainer + Pokémon.
I disagree with the notion that character portrayal isn't important. Because if the characters aren't portrayed correctly, then they aren't really a character anymore so much as they are just a vessel to contain whatever personality or figure (since you mentioned boobs) Nintendo/fan-artists want, and that takes away the charm and magic of the characters, and makes being a fan of them feel redundant. That's absolutely worth discussing and it's absolutely worth fighting for the integrity of the character if the company is messing up with them. Like how Shadow from Sonic used to be a legitimately interesting and cool character, but since Sonic Free Riders, he's been the most comical portrayal of "edgy the hedgy". Basically he's become what his detractors used to wrongfully call him. Fans of the character want him to go back to how he used to be.
Mario may be a more simple series, and for all intents and purposes, Mario himself barely feels like a real character, as do a lot of the others. But some characters like Luigi, Wario, Bowser, and Rosalina, really feel like they have a consistent, defined character across most games or they did at some point, and when that character is
thrown away and replaced with a new kind of characterisation, instead of
building on the existing one, it's upsetting. It's kinda comparable to waking up one morning and you find your best friend or something is an unlikable douche all of a sudden, and he stays that way. That's not something you'll just take lying down.
I just think the VOICE is the least important aspect of characterisation in Mario, and this thread harps on it all of the time while seemingly ignoring everything else. It's part of it, and they can mess up (Rosalina in Mario Party 10, and the fact they took away the echo but that's not the voice actresses fault), but when it comes to Mario, a character's charm comes from their overall personality and role within the universe, what kind of backstory they have (mostly applies to Rosalina almost exclusively in the main series, but there are tidbits of interesting info for other characters, like Wario), and how their dialogue is written, because Mario doesn't have full voice acting, so the writing itself is waaaay more important than the voice acting. The kind of abilities a character has adds to their charm too. Mario is pretty typical super hero stuff and has fire abilities primarily, Bowser is the hulking brute who packs a punch and that can be satisfying in a game like Smash, Wario and Waluigi are really weird and zany, and Rosalina is graceful yet powerful, both physically and with magic.
I'm not against discussing portrayals of characters at all because they are absolutely important, even in Mario. There should be some consistency, and overall quality to how they are portrayed. They should at least ATTEMPT to keep them endearing (not like how Miyamoto seems to think Peach is and should be a literal rat or something).
Being a princess is not s sign of weakness or something to be ashamed of . People need to stop reading fairy tales already and stop stereotypes.
It's more just the principle of the matter. People spread misconceptions about Rosalina all of the time. And as a fan, that gets annoying after a while. Rosalina flat out is not a princess. She doesn't have a kingdom. She isn't a dictator or a democratic representative. She doesn't even dress in regal clothing, her gown basically is just a simple sleeping gown.
And while yes, being a princess doesn't automatically mean being weak or a damsel, the fact is that in Mario games, that IS what being a princess means most of the time. Either that, or insignificant spin-off fodder. So it's kind of annoying when people insist Rosalina is a princess all of a sudden or when PR material or licensed products call her one, and especially when they insist this somehow makes her better, when she literally isn't one.
And it bothers me that people point to the crown as being an indicator of being a princess, because what Rosalina wears,
does not define whether or not she is a princess. Same with any character. Case in point:
Do you see a crown? Do you see regal clothing? No. Yet, this character is still a princess.
Rosalina is the opposite. She wears a crown (which is likely because she's supposed to effectively be god - would explain why her crown is platinum, since Mario characters are designed to convey their function), and she wears a dress of sorts (though it isn't particularly regal). This doesn't magically make her a princess, though.