GraveEclipse567
Smash Apprentice
I love Cyanide and Happiness.Slightly off topic but pretty much sums up the situation for me if Ridley was actually de-confirmed after hearing all characters were pretty much selected from the start
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I love Cyanide and Happiness.Slightly off topic but pretty much sums up the situation for me if Ridley was actually de-confirmed after hearing all characters were pretty much selected from the start
@OblivionWolf posted that a couple hundred pages back iirc.
Look guys, I found another Ridley and Bowser pic! :D
I CAN DREAM!Sadly he's an AT
5 Minutes? I think we need to up the bar a bit, I'm certain almost everyone here has watched that **** for waaaay longer.Remember guys, you need to perform your mandatory 5 minutes of staring at the clip that started it all to remain in the Cool Ridley Club.
http://gfycat.com/ComfortableIncompatibleAzurewingedmagpie#
The fact you can say this so casually humours me greatly.@OblivionWolf posted that a couple hundred pages back iirc.
NANANANANANANANA SAKURAIdammit @ AustarusIV I can't look at your posts without laughing now that new avi is too good
Someone needs to make a Riddler Ridley and a Sakurai Batman so we can have him say
RIDDLE ME THIS SAKURAI
@Alloftheartistsinthisthread get on it
I'd make that my sig or something if Ridley was confirmed xD
I was literally thinking that at work last night "Ridl-ey this Samus" that and Ridl-ey Elmo, hahadammit @ AustarusIV I can't look at your posts without laughing now that new avi is too good
Someone needs to make a Riddler Ridley and a Sakurai Batman so we can have him say
RIDDLE ME THIS SAKURAI
@Alloftheartistsinthisthread get on it
I'd make that my sig or something if Ridley was confirmed xD
I'm so tempted to do that but I don't have any idea how to draw Ridley and the only way I can get images I draw onto the internet is via 3DS which as the quality of a camera from the 1940s that has a dirty lens.dammit @ AustarusIV I can't look at your posts without laughing now that new avi is too good
Someone needs to make a Riddler Ridley and a Sakurai Batman so we can have him say
RIDDLE ME THIS SAKURAI
@Alloftheartistsinthisthread get on it
I'd make that my sig or something if Ridley was confirmed xD
@SchAlternate you may own page 900 but I have page 921. mine is obviously better.
The platforms are on the sides of the stage, while Ridley is clearly towards the middle.Could it be that the shadow is just ridley standing on a platform, jumping a few times and then dashng away and that the shadaw is that huge because of the light and the lava?
I don't change avatars until I make a hundred additional posts, so you're just going to have to get used to Charidley for time being.dammit @ AustarusIV I can't look at your posts without laughing now that new avi is too good
I wasn't asking you to change. Please never change. <3I don't change avatars until I make a hundred additional posts, so you're just going to have to get used to Charidley for time being.
The platforms have their own shadows, we should be able to see thatit could be that the shadow travels there because of the light or the platforms could move within the battle
Not if the platforms are conveniently offscreen, which appears to be the case. I personally think Ridley is simply using up/side B to travel between the platforms.The platforms have their own shadows, we should be able to see that
The shadows from the platforms on the WiiU Battlefield move along with the sun.The platforms have their own shadows, we should be able to see that
I'm still wondering about what I said. Could he be considered "on the ground" but the way he is instead of walking when he is "on the ground" could he be hovering or slightly flying above the ground?I think its possible Ridley is on platforms, but I kinda doubt it because we can't see the shadows of the platforms. (Either way I still think its pretty clear evidence of a playable Ridley.)
Well, we can at least make educated guesses on his size with the shadow right?I really dislike shadow speculation, it's non-specific, and doesn't amount to much. but there is something easily viewable, and that is the fact that he's flapping his wings the entire time - this implies he is not on the ground.
I wouldn't go as far as educated. There are so many things that can change size of an object based off of its shadow - angle of camera from object, light source angle, size of object, ect. It's why shadow puppets can look huge. Since we don't have access to Sm4sh's lighting engine, we have no way of correctly estimating Ridley's size. We don't know where he is in proportion to the camera, other than he is, in some random direction not in front of it, about a tail's length away. We don't know how high up he is, how far, where the light is from. He could be smaller than Pikachu or bigger than giga bowser. IMO the only useful info we got is the Roidley tail spike mixed with the lack of Roidley arms in the shadows kinda points to a new Ridley model.Well, we can at least make educated guesses on his size with the shadow right?
Well that's my point. I am wondering if instead of walking on the ground he sort of flies over it naturally. Idk how to describe it. But my point is he would still be flapping his wings even when he is "on the ground". I'm just curious because it could be done to give Ridley a more airborne feel even when he is on the ground.I really dislike shadow speculation, it's non-specific, and doesn't amount to much. but there is something easily viewable, and that is the fact that he's flapping his wings the entire time - this implies he is not on the ground.
Well, the short answer is, we don't know, and can't really. That's literally all the footage he has. It's an interesting theory, one that's made its rounds a few times. I like the picture of it, personally, but have no idea how likely it is. I guess we'll know in time.Well that's my point. I am wondering if instead of walking on the ground he sort of flies over it naturally. Idk how to describe it. But my point is he would still be flapping his wings even when he is "on the ground". I'm just curious because it could be done to give Ridley a more airborne feel even when he is on the ground.
I thought he was hovering across the ground, based on the fact he seems to move across the screen following Pikachu with no increase in height, which wouldn't be possible on the platforms from the looks of it , re-watched some footage because I thought they moved but they're all static so there's no way Ridley could have been using themI'm still wondering about what I said. Could he be considered "on the ground" but the way he is instead of walking when he is "on the ground" could he be hovering or slightly flying above the ground?
Oh, I see, that makes sense.I wouldn't go as far as educated. There are so many things that can change size of an object based off of its shadow - angle of camera from object, light source angle, size of object, ect. It's why shadow puppets can look huge. Since we don't have access to Sm4sh's lighting engine, we have no way of correctly estimating Ridley's size. We don't know where he is in proportion to the camera, other than he is, in some random direction not in front of it, about a tail's length away. We don't know how high up he is, how far, where the light is from. He could be smaller than Pikachu or bigger than giga bowser. IMO the only useful info we got is the Roidley tail spike mixed with the lack of Roidley arms in the shadows kinda points to a new Ridley model.
Trying to estimate Ridley's size from is shadow is like trying to estimate the full CSS size from the demo CSS
People have put a lot of effort into trying to estimate Ridley's size based off of his shadow in this thread. And while the effort is admirable, the part of me that remembers my optics units in physics knows that most of it's bunk. Coloring in a shadow and using that to try and estimate area of the actual object can have a ridiculously high margin of error in certain cases. And we know that this clip was made very carefully, who knows how that was actually angled.Oh, I see, that makes sense.
Just out of curiosity, do you think it is possible for people to use the pic of the part of his tail that was shown? I'd assume it isn't enough or too inconclusive but like I said I was just wondering.People have put a lot of effort into trying to estimate Ridley's size based off of his shadow in this thread. And while the effort is admirable, the part of me that remembers my optics units in physics knows that most of it's bunk. Coloring in a shadow and using that to try and estimate area of the actual object can have a ridiculously high margin of error in certain cases. And we know that this clip was made very carefully, who knows how that was actually angled.
Nah, it only flashes in front of the camera for a split second, and we only see the very tip, so it could have come from literally any direction that we can't see. He could be wrapping the camera with his tail for all we know.Just out of curiosity, do you think it is possible for people to use the pic of the part of his tail that was shown? I'd assume it isn't enough or too inconclusive but like I said I was just wondering.
It would be really accurate, but only if they were using the same model Oasis used to compare it to.Oasis_S did a size comparison using the tail back when the Direct was recent (400 pages ago) and Ridley turned out to be much larger than Bowser but in scale with Samus as they were in Other m. No idea how accurate that was.