Perhaps, or those who didn't like both games just felt that Other M was so bad that it made Prime 3 look good. Either way Prime 3's pretty criticized, even though it's not on Other M levels, and I knew some would bring up Other M after what I said.
Probably, though with how tired most became of the whole Phazon thing after Prime 3, I question how well a Prime 4 would actually do (Retro said in an interview or something one time that if the Prime Trilogy on Wii had sold well enough, they would bring back Dark Samus/Phazon and continue the storyline of where they left off).
I agree though that they should return to the 2Ds first and foremost (or a Metroid 3D sidescroller, a la DKCR as Wariofan suggested), and am guessing that their new game will be a Star Fox as well, which I feel the same way about after this past gen.
All true, but the Metroid Prime name and sub-series still has enough fans that if Retro's project
does turn out to be Prime 4, "a game that everyone wants us to make" would still probably apply. It's not like if they turned out to be working of Wave Race or StarTropics or something, which really... very few people want them to do over Metroid or Starfox. Even though I think it's between Metroid and Starfox, I'd say those two, plus Zelda, DK, and F-Zero would all count as "a game that everyone wants us to make".
And I'm guessing the Prime subtitle still has enough recognition to be more successful commercially than Other M. By now the subtitle itself is a distinctive brand with its own subset of fans.
Also surprising Retro said that about the Prime Trilogy, considering it had a pretty limited release to my knowledge. Hell, it's more expensive now than Xenoblade.
Fair enough, and with any luck, if Retro's still involved with DK in the future, perhaps they'll realize that bringing back the Kremlings would be essential for another big-seller DK title. I mean they didn't exclude Metroid's classic enemies the Space Pirates in the Prime games, so yeah.
Yeah, why the Kremling were excluded is still a puzzle, but really I think the best thing for future chances of them re-appearing is if K. Rool gets included in Smash.
Zelda I don't think needs Retro's help though. It does well enough as it is, being one of Nintendo's top prioritized series and all.
No, I agree, I was just speaking hypothetically. Miyamoto did say he wouldn't mind working with Retro on Zelda though...
I personally really don't want another first person Metroid game, I think Prime 1 was excellent as I stated earlier, but Metroid is and should always first and foremost be a sidescroller imo,
I wouldn't really be upset if we got another first-person Metroid, but I agree I'd much rather have another 2D Metroid.
it's like making Mega Man a first person shooter, that wouldn't be that cool either.
WELL WE'LL NEVER KNOW NOW, WILL WE CAPCOM?!
2D would be most prefered, but nearly nothing is 2D anymore, it kind of died with the announcement of Pokémon X & Y sadly.
I disagree. I suppose you mean sprite-based, which, in that case I agree, but since the success of NSMB and DKCR I can see Nintendo refocusing on 2D more and more. They already have with NSMB.
Sprite-wise, yeah, if we got a Metroid side-scrolling now, it'd likely be 3D graphics with a 2D perspective, which is what I guess I meant.
I agree with the rest.