Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Is that even possible?I'm very sorry for not being clear enough.
Eiter we get him pre release or October 3rd.
I believe that we got Shulk right before the japanese release to hype them. We get Ridley to hype us, that is why we know of this trailet so early.
The japanese game will then be patched to unclude Ridley without spoiling the suprise.
I'd prefer him to be original,Would you guys be fine with Ridley being a Charizard clone? At this point I'm so desperate for Ridley seeing him be a Charizard clone would be fine for me.
It MIGHT be possible, considering the circumstances this is what I think.Is that even possible?
A non dlc being added to the roster later on?
The dectractors will be pound us with this till that if true.
It's plausible, but not probable.Like I said, while that may as well be the case, the other scenario I proposed is also plausible. There's really no way of knowing.
Also, I thought the idea of playable bosses was debunked some time ago.
And did you just implied Ridley is too big...?
I wouldn't be happy but if it gets him in as a playable character I would tolerate itWould you guys be fine with Ridley being a Charizard clone? At this point I'm so desperate for Ridley seeing him be a Charizard clone would be fine for me.
Oh boy, this question again.Would you guys be fine with Ridley being a Charizard clone? At this point I'm so desperate for Ridley seeing him be a Charizard clone would be fine for me.
I'd prefer not, but if he was, Ridley would still be in smash, so I'd be okay with it.Would you guys be fine with Ridley being a Charizard clone? At this point I'm so desperate for Ridley seeing him be a Charizard clone would be fine for me.
As much as it would pain me I too would agree to those termsI'd prefer not, but if he was, Ridley would still be in smash, so I'd be okay with it.
Did he really did that joke?I think this is the best reply of all time about Ridley.
This is from Bill Trinen, the Nintendo guy.
https://twitter.com/trintran/status/505927970192502784
Despite me not playing a Metroid game before, Ridley being a Charizard clone could happen, but that would be completely lazy of Sakurai and the dev team. Ridley has been shown to have a unique and promising moveset in the Metroid games and to not use any of those aspects would piss me off, even though I never played the games. So no, I wouldn't be fine to have him a Charizard clone, at least to me. If being a boss hazard, or even a playable boss hazard (who would be a slow, boring, terribly inaccurate to Ridley's personality of being a ruthless, cunning, and powerful Space Dragon he's known to be) isn't a good idea to us, then Ridley being a clone to anyone, knowing he has so much moveset potential wouldn't be ideal to anyone.Would you guys be fine with Ridley being a Charizard clone? At this point I'm so desperate for Ridley seeing him be a Charizard clone would be fine for me.
That would heavily imply that sakurai doesn't care enough to try to get Ridley to work or he was a late addition given no thought beyond a good model and believable movements.Would you guys be fine with Ridley being a Charizard clone? At this point I'm so desperate for Ridley seeing him be a Charizard clone would be fine for me.
That's it, spongebob confirmed. Miiverse was right all along. Now I just have to wait for Goku, Shrek, and minecraft steve. Ridley never had a chance to begin with these heavy hitters in.Did he really did that joke?
RIDLEY CONFIRMED!!!
(just to be clear, this^ was straw grasping).
On a side note, what was the all star pic? Didn't see it.
Well, think about it. With the 3DS's small screen (compared to a TV screen), the small icons that appear at the upper corner wouldn't be distinguishable and there would be way too many of them and cover the screen. The likely solution would be to just remove them, but then how will you tell who's gonna be next? Simple; combine both the portraits of the character you'll be facing next battle with the icons, and you'll get what you see. A group of portraits, with the one at the beginning showing the one you'd be fighting first, then the one you'll be fighting next, etc, and with every defeated character another one shifts into the list.It's plausible, but not probable.
Would you guys be fine with Ridley being a Charizard clone?
>What is Donkey Kong.Thank goodness his wonky proportions makes it hard to be a clone of anyone.
dittoGuys, you can put me on the support list, I've been a lurker for a really long time now...
As much as I hate the idea and I don't think it would work because of how different he is from Charazard, I'd put up with it becuase he would finally be in. But I doubt he is a clone, they just have too much to work with Ridley to make hima clone.Would you guys be fine with Ridley being a Charizard clone? At this point I'm so desperate for Ridley seeing him be a Charizard clone would be fine for me.
I wouldn't mind as I can't really see him as a complete clone. At most, compared to charizard, he would be what Jigglypuff is to kirby.Would you guys be fine with Ridley being a Charizard clone? At this point I'm so desperate for Ridley seeing him be a Charizard clone would be fine for me.
It's also plausible they just do away with the icons as a whole and continue letting the hologram pictures serve their most reasonable purpose.Well, think about it. With the 3DS's small screen (compared to a TV screen), the small icons that appear at the upper corner wouldn't be distinguishable and there would be way too many of them and cover the screen. The likely solution would be to just remove them, but then how will you tell who's gonna be next? Simple; combine both the portraits of the character you'll be facing next battle with the icons, and you'll get what you see. A group of portraits, with the one at the beginning showing the one you'd be fighting first, then the one you'll be fighting next, etc, and with every defeated character another one shifts into the list.
I mean, given, it's not as likely as I'd hope it'd be, but it's still plausible, and even probable... to a degree.
Remember the notorious Pokemon Round All Star in brawl?
My thoughts on this are that in melee, order was pretty random. This was interesting because in Melee it introduced an increase in fighters up to a max of 3 as the rounds progressed. Mr. G&W... meh....
In Brawl, the order was franchise themed. With no limit to the number of characters that could appear. However, the fact that it was this way, sometimes you faced up to 1 character, and the challenge aspect was thrown all over the place. Because the number of characters wasn't consistent, the overall feel of allstar mode felt quite odd. The maximum number of cpu's that you would fight in brawl was 4, (but 2 at a time where defeating one character would get replaced with the next cpu).
So in this edition of allstar mode they went time themed? So according to that, it has come to my understanding that the order of when the characters made their appearance is shown from top left to bottom right. But why would they not put Ridley next to Samus? Numbers reason of course. They want to keep each round consistent with the number of fighters. 5 to me seems like an ideal number of fighters per allstar round. With this we can assume that Ridley could appear in the next match up from 1986 - 198X. I just feel like this theme is still inconsistent in some aspects to the point where they are trying to control how Allstar is setup, in a similar fashion to Brawl's but with a more consistent number approach. Nothing is set and stone just from one picture. It could be that they could also make adjustments, such as create a clone round, or third party round, etc.
Ridley won't get deconfirmed unless it comes straight from Daddy Sakurai.
Looking at these franchises, I'd say either N's Castle (irony) or Palutena's Temple.What stage would be fought on if you were to fight different franchises within a time period? (1985-1986)
These are the same people who think Ridley could be a clone of Charizard. Don't expect to see brain activity.Why are people still worrying about the allstar thing?
It's more like the people who still has doubts about Ridley's inclusion keeps bringing back this dead argument and the people who believes in Ridley's inclusion are questioning what does this have to do with Ridley. IMO, until another screenshot appears where Sammy isn't at the end of the list and no sign of Ridley is located next to her, THEN I'll worry about this.Why are people still worrying about the allstar thing?
Wow, I love that thought! Think of it; do you really so many enemies crunched together without any breaks?
My thoughts on this are that in melee, order was pretty random. This was interesting because in Melee it introduced an increase in fighters up to a max of 3 as the rounds progressed. Mr. G&W... meh....
In Brawl, the order was franchise themed. With no limit to the number of characters that could appear. However, the fact that it was this way, sometimes you faced up to 1 character, and the challenge aspect was thrown all over the place. Because the number of characters wasn't consistent, the overall feel of allstar mode felt quite odd. The maximum number of cpu's that you would fight in brawl was 4, (but 2 at a time where defeating one character would get replaced with the next cpu).
So in this edition of allstar mode they went time themed? So according to that, it has come to my understanding that the order of when the characters made their appearance is shown from top left to bottom right. But why would they not put Ridley next to Samus? Numbers reason of course. They want to keep each round consistent with the number of fighters. 5 to me seems like an ideal number of fighters per allstar round. With this we can assume that Ridley could appear in the next match up from 1986 - 198X. I just feel like this theme is still inconsistent in some aspects to the point where they are trying to control how Allstar is setup, in a similar fashion to Brawl's but with a more consistent number approach. Nothing is set and stone just from one picture. It could be that they could also make adjustments, such as create a clone round, or third party round, etc.
Ridley won't get deconfirmed unless it comes straight from Daddy Sakurai.
Wow, I love that thought! Think of it; do you really so many enemies crunched together without any breaks?
Ridley's still looking dandy, I hope! ^^
I can't believe Barney will be in Smash before Ridley.I think this is the best reply of all time about Ridley.
This is from Bill Trinen, the Nintendo guy.
https://twitter.com/trintran/status/505927970192502784
-25%If Ridley turns out being a boss and not playable, then what do you think his chances are at being DLC?
I was expecting a response like that, which is why I hope that he is not even a boss at all.-25%
Most likely very slim as being implemented as a boss would of meant Sakurai had no intention of Ridley being playable, period. (Unless he's a playable boss, but that's just not a good idea at all) So Ridley's either a normal, playable character or he's just a stage hazard, a bad one at that. The only way Ridley makes it in if he's not playable in Smash 4 is to hope for his inclusion in Smash 5, which isn't all that likely in the first place.If Ridley turns out being a boss and not playable, then what do you think his chances are at being DLC?
Well, what can you say. Haters gonna hate. People just hate on anything for no damn reason at all. And for what? A fictional character getting into a video game? That's a pretty petty reason to do as a person.I guess I should especially be expecting the detractors to be out in full force this close to Japanese release date, but I mean come on, I'd rather this thread ride on in brotherly love in support of Ridley waiting for the final hour rather than escalate into a flame war between the two sides of Ridley being playable or not...
Basically, lots of possibilities are plausible.It's also plausible they just do away with the icons as a whole and continue letting the hologram pictures serve their most reasonable purpose.
It's also plausible the icons are still there and the screen size doesn't matter or affect it much.
It's also plausible Ridley is not a playable character.
Which is exactly why I bank the argument on what's more probable, not plausible.Basically, lots of possibilities are plausible.
The All-Star mode holograms functioning the same as they have in previous games is plausible.
The All-Star mode holograms functioning differently than they have in previous games is plausible.
Ridley not being playable is plausible.
Ridley being playable is plausible.
We're not going to get anywhere with this.