Saltwater Gem
Smash Journeyman
You're just justifying bullying. Like it's impossible to respond to it with civility.Because that is an incredibly stupid thing to suggest. Falcondorf is the exception not the rule.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
You're just justifying bullying. Like it's impossible to respond to it with civility.Because that is an incredibly stupid thing to suggest. Falcondorf is the exception not the rule.
Well, suggesting such an ignorant claim was a rather bold move in itself given how Ridley and Charizard share little to no similarities in both physical structure and abilities (besides being fire breathing dragons).This thread is proof positive of (some!) Ridley fanboys being bullies. I was practically assaulted for suggesting that he might be a Charizard clone.
That only applies to the 3DS version, not the Wii U, so it's probably not the case.I recall someone saying elsewhere that "Ridley" isn't moving at 60 fps, only at about 30 fps, which could make him look a little jerkier. The Yellow Devil also moves at 30 fps. But that's just what someone told me, anyway.
Youtube's limit is 30 fps. There's no way to tell, unfortunately.I recall someone saying elsewhere that "Ridley" isn't moving at 60 fps, only at about 30 fps, which could make him look a little jerkier. The Yellow Devil also moves at 30 fps. But that's just what someone told me, anyway.
The two long-necked, winged fire-breathing dragons share little similarities? My point at the time was that it was the CLOSEST physical form to Ridley.Well, suggesting such an ignorant claim was a rather bold move in itself given how Ridley and Charizard share little to no similarities in both physical structure and abilities (besides being fire breathing dragons).
To be fair, that's a really shallow and foolish statement. You take a look at Charizard, then a look at Ridley and say "Oh look. They're both dragons. welp. DECONFIRMED LOLOLOL". I've seen other detractors use this argument and it is just an absolutely awful way to try to debunk Ridley's playability. Think about this: Were Mario and Luigi clones? Were Peach and Rosalina clones? Not at all. Just because something looks similar does not mean at all that it would have a very similar moveset. Your claim was dumb and all you can do is call us out for being bullies....mkay.This thread is proof positive of (some!) Ridley fanboys being bullies. I was practically assaulted for suggesting that he might be a Charizard clone.
I didn't say deconfirmed! I just asked how fans would feel if he was a Charizard clone.To be fair, that's a really shallow and foolish statement. You take a look at Charizard, then a look at Ridley and say "Oh look. They're both dragons. welp. DECONFIRMED LOLOLOL". I've seen other detractors use this argument and it is just an absolutely awful way to try to debunk Ridley's playability. Think about this: Were Mario and Luigi clones? Were Peach and Rosalina clones? Not at all. Just because something looks similar does not mean at all that it would have a very similar moveset. Your claim was dumb and all you can do is call us out for being bullies....mkay.
Except, see, the mistake made here was that Ridley does not in any way resemble Charizard. He'd be more of a DK clone.I didn't say deconfirmed! I just asked how fans would feel if he was a Charizard clone.
Have you seen Ridley's neck? That thing is basically a bent straw. That's one of the main reasons why attempting to port Ridley's model into Charizard resulted in stuff like this:The two long-necked, winged fire-breathing dragons share little similarities? My point at the time was that it was the CLOSEST physical form to Ridley.
You're not being insulted. You're being educated in an aggressive way. If you haven't read the second post, I'd highly recommend it.I didn't say deconfirmed! I just asked how fans would feel if he was a Charizard clone.
I mean, you don't see the irony here? We're talking about Ridley fans being aggressive bullies and I've already been insulted by 3 people in the last couple minutes.
Easy. I know Ridley has enough to work with. The whole premise was just asking how fans would feel if he turned out to be a clone. Charizard just happens to be the most logical reply the subsequent question "of who?". But I was beat up (and now again) before anyone even grasped the premise of what I was asking.Have you seen Ridley's neck? That thing is basically a bent straw. That's one of the main reasons why attempting to port Ridley's model into Charizard resulted in stuff like this:
Eugh.
Besides, why would Ridley have a move where he smashes a rock with his head in his moveset?
If you observe his fight in Super Metroid, you can see that he flies indifinately, spits fireballs, air grab, pogo sticks with his tail, etc. He doesn't need to be a clone, he already has more than enough to work with.
Yes, I'm well educated on trying to construct a laughable conspiracy out of Sakurai's intentions and the shadow voodoo and etc. Being aggressive isn't a good defense against accusations of being aggressive.You're not being insulted. You're being educated in an aggressive way. If you haven't read the second post, I'd highly recommend it.
AT WHAT POINT DID I SAY FOR SURE HE FOR SURE WOULDN'T BE IN THE GAME?Going to a support thread for said character and saying for sure they won't be in the game, then receives an expected response = bullied
Three people disagree with me = Ridley Fans are bullies, seems legit.
I'm so sick of hearing about that second postYou're not being insulted. You're being educated in an aggressive way. If you haven't read the second post, I'd highly recommend it.
Ridley is 100% not going to be playable in this game. Maybe, MAYBE in some 'control the boss' format, but not as a regular fighter. I'm willing to bet my account on it.
I want him in badly, but he's not.
Beat up? What do you mean by that? We just naturally responded by claiming that to be nonsense.Easy. I know Ridley has enough to work with. The whole premise was just asking how fans would feel if he turned out to be a clone. Charizard just happens to be the most logical reply the subsequent question "of who?". But I was beat up (and now again) before anyone even grasped the premise of what I was asking.
As much as I don't think Ridley is playable
I'm so sick of hearing about that second post
I mean it contains most if not all arguments made here so it only makes sense for people to refer back to it often.I'm so sick of hearing about that second post
Ridley is 100% not going to be playable in this game. Maybe, MAYBE in some 'control the boss' format, but not as a regular fighter. I'm willing to bet my account on it.
I want him in badly, but he's not.
I didn't say deconfirmed! I just asked how fans would feel if he was a Charizard clone.
.
You owe us one account if your claiming you changed your mind.AT WHAT POINT DID I SAY FOR SURE HE FOR SURE WOULDN'T BE IN THE GAME?
go to the post thats after the first post but just before the third post.I'm so sick of hearing about that second post
Well this is ironic.
Nope. It's actually the opposite. Considering we're in the most popular Ridley forum. Nice try tho.Well this is ironic.
So does that mean you changed your mind? One account, please.And what's the distance between my post saying he's not playable and asking about being a Charizard clone? Days? Weeks? Months?
A little over two months, but you've given us no reason to even attempt to think you changed your mind. I mean, suggesting he might be a Charizard clone sounds rather troll-y.And what's the distance between my post saying he's not playable and asking about being a Charizard clone? Days? Weeks? Months?
i think u might be overreacting to the replies lolI didn't say deconfirmed! I just asked how fans would feel if he was a Charizard clone.
I mean, you don't see the irony here? We're talking about Ridley fans being aggressive bullies and I've already been insulted by 3 people in the last couple minutes.
I wasn't talking about him being deconfirmed in the post I made MONTHS LATER asking about him being a Charizard clone. I still feel 100% that he is not playable, but I trusted that you would be mature enough to respond to my question, not go off on a dismissive froth-mouthed tangent putting together weird jigsaw pieces from months-spaced posts.You owe us one account if your claiming you changed your mind.
Well to be fair, asking how fans of any character (for the most part) would feel if said character was to be included in the game as a clone would probably result in disapproving responses to such an idea. I don't know about you, but I would like to see the characters I support implemented in a (preferably unique) way that is true to their fighting style, game, or other characteristics (excluding size), and not in a way that respects the character characteristics of someone/some creature from a completely different franchise, you know?I didn't say deconfirmed! I just asked how fans would feel if he was a Charizard clone.
I mean, you don't see the irony here? We're talking about Ridley fans being aggressive bullies and I've already been insulted by 3 people in the last couple minutes.
With that logic Bowser and Charizard might be clones.This thread is proof positive of (some!) Ridley fanboys being bullies. I was practically assaulted for suggesting that he might be a Charizard clone.
Thank you! That is perfect!Well to be fair, asking how fans of any character (for the most part) would feel if said character was to be included in the game as a clone would probably result in disapproving responses to such an idea. I don't know about you, but I would like to see the characters I support implemented in a (preferably unique) way that is true to their fighting style, game, or other characteristics (excluding size), and not in a way that respects the character characteristics of someone/some creature from a completely different franchise, you know?
Ganondorf is a good example, I really like him as a character, but my biggest pet peeve is the fact that he is a Captain Falcon clone, certainly in Brawl they slightly decloned him, but he was still a Captain Falcon Clone for the most part, with the major differentiation coming in his movement speed and damage characteristics. I personally would much rather have Ganondorf with a moveset that pays respect to his character elements from the LoZ franchise, not the character elements of an F-Zero Racer (of course, Falcon's moveset was completely made from scratch because he canonically is never out of his vehicle, but the point stands).
Furthermore, while I frown upon such hostility from some of my fellow Ridley Supporters, it should be noted that the subjects of Ridley's "lack of potential" and "size issues" have become incredibly sensitive subjects to the majority of us because of the absolutely ridiculous amount of ridicule we have received for supporting him.
I'll be upfront about it, this fanbase has some mean and nasty people, but at the same time, that is at least partially because we have had, for a long time, the nastiest of all detractor bases for any character. What other fanbase is there that has such strong detraction that they have actually created a term for said detractors? [Toobigots] (Yes, not all Ridley detractors are against him from the size standpoint, but a good number of them are).
After such continued (and sometimes, extremely harsh) hostility, it's not very extreme to think that the base that endures said hostility will eventually become hostile in response.
Not many people (myself included, admittedly) are able to simply "turn the other cheek" and let such hostility/abrasive detraction fall on us without having some hostile response in return, which is why we have garnered such a reputation as "bullies" to some.
So many times have we been met with this hostile detraction that a hostile response in return has, for most people, become the norm to the point that we will respond hostilely to even a "peaceful" detractor.
In short, Hostility breeds Hostility, and some of us have been dealing with this detraction for so long that this Hostility is all we know.
I apologize if you or other detractors feel that we are "bullying" you by shooting down your opinions and such. But at the same time, such adamant and (potentially) hostile detraction (as it most often is) will be met with adamant and (possibly) hostile responses, that's just how severe this entire thing has become.
I think everyone is overreacting. This has turned absolutely ridiculous. Does it actually matter if he supports or not? I mean, if someone's willing to engage in civil conversation, and acknowledge our side, then does it really matter whether he's a detractor or not? Honestly, it's absolutely absurd to think that a defining factor of whether we should verbally harass or laud someone is whether they believe that a character will be playable in a video game that hasn't even come out yet, and that there's not enough evidence to prove whether he's really playable or a boss. Look, I don't want this to turn into some sort of ridiculous Inquisition against people who don't believe in the almighty Ridley.i think u might be overreacting to the replies lol
Well what I was getting at was that your idea of bulling is warped, every time you post here its usually in disagreement of Ridley being playable, everyone here has one thing in common, they want Ridley playable, so they disagree with you. That's not bulling.In a discussion completely different from the one we're having? So you can't respond to what I'm saying with civility because you don't like something I said 3 months ago?