A full argument I am having with the detractor on Relax's vid, my statements are bold
"Sakurai doesn't hint at bosses, he shows them."
This is an incredulous claim. So I'm sure Sakurai didn't hint at other boss appearances on various stages during the direct. I'm sure Sakurai didn'thint that Ridley would be one of the stage bosses players have to watch out for.
"Sakurai knew loads of people wanted Ridley playable."
It doesn't make a difference whether people wanted Ridley or not. I'm sure people want Waluigi or Isaac playable but they've been assist trophies. It doesn't matter if a character is highly wanted or not. It all depends on whether or not Sakurai can integrate them into the game and make them fit.
"Sakurai is listening to the western audience this time as of Little Mac"
This is a selfish claim.
"People found out that shadow isn't all too big."
Shadow analyses aren't accurate. You can't successfully get the feel of something by looking at its shadow. Light source effects how a shadow looks.
"IF THE FAKE HYPE IS OUR FAULT THEN WHY DID SAKURAI NOT DELIBRATLY STATE 'Ridley isn't playable' FROM THE START?"
Are you kidding me? He's given not one, but twoclear hints. When talking about the Pyrosphere stage, he mentions a past trauma of Samus will appear as a hazard (that exact area is where Samus confronts Ridley in Other M). Then during the direct, he shows a shadow of a boss character that is obviously Ridley with the captions "other boss character appearances* below it. You honestly need Sakurai to state the obvious before it sinks in?
It's not his fault you guys are too dense to get a clue. Sakurai isn't creating the false hype, you guys are.
"Sakurai stated nothing about, didn't show or even mention Ridley."
Sakurai hasn't mentioned any other bosses either. We saw the Dark Emperor from Find Mii, for instance, but we don't even know what he does yet.
"It's almost been one year, and there ARE people who are still vague about Ridley."
The only thing vague is what Ridley does as a stage boss, and even then most people noticed that Ridley seems to grab Pikachu before taking off, meaning that he might swoop in to harass fighters by snatching them away or other things. Ridley's status as a boss isn't vague at all.
"It would also cause FAKE HYPE."
Sakurai isn't the one causing the fake hype. It's you people.
"Little Mac was ONLY requested by the non-Japanese, how is that a selfish claim? Ridley and Palutena were teased in the same way."
It's a selfish claim because you're implying that western fans influenced Sakurai to add Little Mac, as if he only had fans overseas. And no, Ridley and Palutena were not teased in the same way. When was Palutena ever teased as a stage hazard?
"The Mega Man shadow is in the same angle and same spot as Ridley's shadow, it may not be 100% accurate, but it will still be pretty damn accurate."
As you said, it's not 100% accurate. Case closed. For that matter I honestly don't see how a freaking shadow can prove that Ridley is playable and Sakurai is lying.
"And Pikachu's shadow was grabbed by Ridley, but we can see Pikachu fits in Ridley's hand, and that would mean he is resized."
Again, we're looking at shadows.
"IF THE FAKE HYPE IS OUR FAULT THEN WHY DID SAKURAI NOT DELIBRATLY STATE 'Ridley isn't playable' FROM THE START?"
Are you kidding me? He's given not one, but twoclear hints. When talking about the Pyrosphere stage, he mentions a past trauma of Samus will appear as a hazard (that exact area is where Samus confronts Ridley in Other M). Then during the direct, he shows a shadow of a boss character that is obviously Ridley with the captions "other boss character appearances* below it. You honestly need Sakurai to state the obvious before it sinks in?
It's not his fault you guys are too dense to get a clue. Sakurai isn't creating the false hype, you guys are.
ANDREA! I SUMMON THEE TO USE ASSASINLEY OR WHATNOT