I know this very well from the previous fight I had for Roy during pre-Brawl. There was someone that was merely "neutral" on Roy (he was not a supporter of him or anything, but he saw no reason as to why he should be cut). One thing that really bugged him was the Sigurd fanbase's claims (these were the ones who attacked Roy the most), and he really felt that they were making up a lot of false claims, and always badgered them for proof behind the stuff they were saying (such as Sigurd being planned for Melee/Smash 64, Sigurd being Sakurai's favorite character, Sigurd being popularly requested for Melee, etc.).
He ended up translating Sakurai's pre-Melee journal (particularly the results), the pieces of the journal that were really integral (such as Sakurai talking about who his favorite FE character was), found the official Japanese FE6 poll, and the official Japanese FE7 poll. He translated some other Japanese articles too.
This guy ended up leaving right before the Brawl roster leak was confirmed because he was extremely disappointed with the final roster (among his beefs was Lip not making it in, Sheik returning while Mewtwo and Roy got the boot which he thought was a hypocritical decision by Sakurai, that is the only two I can remember from the top of my head). He never logged back in since that day.
He single handedly eliminated the Sigurd fanbase by translating the Melee poll and journal, yet he was not even a fervent supporter of Roy. He merely thought Roy had no reason to be cut and that he should return since he was popular and well-received character.
I think you are probably more like that guy. You are more motivated by an animus towards Chrom and the legions of people at GameFAQs who worship him for whatever reason (seriously Chrom has the strongest support anywhere at GameFAQs, though all the prediction rosters at NeoGAF have Chrom on their roster) than actual support for Roy. I mean you don't think Roy should be excluded, and actually agree that he should return (and that at least he would be a better choice than Chrom/Lucina)
That sounds kind of the situation I'm in, even right down to being a supporter for Lip. Not sure if I'd change the whole game by being "revolutionary" though. I'm not here to change lives, just here to shovel down the truth. If there's one thing that won't fly, it's people blinded by ignorance. Which is where the Chrom and GameFAQs thing comes into play, and one thing for sure is that it's not a justified endeavor.
Also yes, I do find Roy the be the better choice then Chrom/Lucina. For starters, Roy is a character people actually give a crap about. Even though I'm not a huge fan of Roy and do question why he's popular via experience, if more people will be happy with Roy, so be it. I'm not going to be
that person that's going to cry over spilled milk if Roy does not make it in.
However, in FE, its important to remember that there are plenty of characters that don't believe in "the cause" (typically restoring a homeland) and instead fight for other motives (money, revenge against a particular enemy, etc.), but along the way sympathy grows for the cause of the lord that has employed him/her.
Cracking GameFAQs is going to be really hard, however, they are certainly beatable. There are really only two really fervent Chrom supporters there. In the face of a whole bunch of Chrom naysayers they will fold, or at the very least become much more skeptical on him as a prospective character.
However, although that is where your aim ends, I want to go beyond that and make GameFAQs a hospitable environment for Roy supporters, and have a large healthy network of supporters there.
We will see how things end up. In FE, you gain some unexpected allies and make friends out of former enemies. However, one thing is for certain there is going to be profound challenges ahead of us.
More Fire Emblem analogies I see... fair enough, this is a Fire Emblem discussion after all. Not sure if I fall into a certain archetype like a particular character in the franchise.
Well, like any enemy, you have to find their weakspot and hit it for massive damage. The weakspot in this case is that the support is not strong, and as they say a weak foundation is easily broken. All that's needed is to show the error of their ways through example. Cold hard evidence can turn the tide of any debate. However, the key thing is to be persistent.
It's not that there aren't any Chrom or Pac-Man supporters that want them for who they are (I do agree that a few legitimate Pac-Man supporters exist) so much as the issue I have with is that the majority of people just support them because they feel Chrom and/or Pac-Man HAVE to be in. Pac-Man especially bothers me with his "expected but not wanted" status since I feel as people are missing the point of what makes third-parties so special; because they aren't supposed to be expected and they're suppose to be exciting. Pac-Man to most people, simply isn't. Chrom and Pac-Man's situation aren't the same, but I do feel as they're comparable.
That said, your response was fair enough, especially given that unlike Chrom, the only thing I can do is sit and wait to see if Pac-Man gets revealed at E3 and unlike with Fire Emblem, fighting against other third-parties is futile. Back to Chrom...
Look, we're only going to get surprised by a third party character if it comes out of the left field. Sonic may of brought hype, but the surprise factor was underwhelming. Same thing will apply to Mega Man and (to an extent) Pac-man. If you want something more surprising, try something more along the lines of say Ryu Hayabuse or Bayonetta.
I would adore the former.
But yes, it's not exactly the same thing, but again I will say the case of Chrom is not as strong. Pac-man at least has the benefit of being a gaming icon to the point of being a influential figure, while Chrom is seen as just another Lord in Fire Emblem. While neither are the most appealing, I could see why Pac-man would hypothetically be chosen. But at the same time, we don't really need him ether, so it's not going to be deal breaker ether way.
Not to mention that like ChronoBound brought up before, Ike should have destroyed the sales argument, given that his game sold very poorly in Japan (lowest selling FE game) yet got in because of his character. Sales are also not correlated to fan demand. Higher sales of FE13 has not made Chrom a more popular addition than Roy of FE6, not by a large margin.
Personally I blame the notion of being recent being the culprit, which is relatively blunt with Brawl putting in a lot of content that was more recent. Trophies in particular were ripped from other games (Twilight Princess, Pokemon Battle Revolution Fire Emblem: Radiant of Dawn etc.) released around the time, which is why some series got a lot more then others. Roy (ironically) is also a bit of an contributor, making people think that a character will be included to promote some game.
As for characters that would stand out more, it makes me wish we could get Leif (Leaf) with his Master Knight class status. It would be a dream come true for those wanting a character with an unique move set. Sadly, that day will never come...
Again, Ephraim. Would really like the idea of a lance user. To an extent, Hector and Micaiah too for some sort of change of pace. Fire Emblem in my opinion has untapped potential that is unfortunately ignored. But at the same time, there's an understanding as to why. Hell, being more distinctive is one reason why I'd pick Roy over Chrom/Lucina. His fire sword provides more liberties with moves.
I also noticed that you're trying to involve game play into arguing for a character. Since I mainly focus on what I feel gets a character in (importance, popularity, uniqueness (not necessarily move set potentials), being able to fit in), I don't really emphasize in game play a lot, but I do feel as we should sharpen our blades for game play arguments, especially on Smashboards (where game play is taken more seriously).
Gameplay is a very important factor, more important then people think. How a character plays can make or break a character. Even if the character in question was Jesus Christ with machine guns riding a grizzly bear, it won't matter much if he's a **** character. You know what I mean? You think people were ****ting on Mewtwo for the hell of it? In the end, how a character plays will be the ultimate factor in the long run.
On top of it, the characters this time around are not as blunt. A lot of them are more obscure then the normal fluff, and in cases they don't even have a foundation to work off of. You need to be more persuasive with these characters, give us a reason to play as them. The days of having a pretty face being the definitive factor is long gone.