so your whole argument is basically "they're lying about thinking that portraying a homosexual relationship wasn't allowed given that those kinds of relationships have been portrayed on TV before. they really only included that final scene to appear progressive?"
lol
Oh look, being disrespectful when you didn't even understand my sentiments. How awesome. Looks like this is my last post.
No, I never said they lied. I said that it is overall insulting for us to recognize a "romance" being built by being asked to watch the show without "hetero-goggles". If a show is written well, you don't need to do that ****. You don't need them holding hands, hugging, kissing, etc etc to show the audience that they will become a pair. What you need to show is them having more intimate and more emotional moments. You can even have some awkward dialogue and hidden jokes between the two as well. I will state this again, Book 3 took place in roughly a 2 week time span. All we saw was the "car talk" and then Asami holding Korra's hand at the end of the Book. Everything in between shows no implications of a romance or even a strong friendship developing. It was two characters working alongside one another.
and don't say that asami was put in the backdrop. do you know which character that happened to? Kai. HE was put on the bench hardcore. Asami has always been involved in anything the avatar team was doing. Maybe less so in season 3, where she does "tag along" Korra while BUILDING A CLOSER RELATIONSHIP with her.
Kai is a minor character, while Asami is part of the main cast. I honestly don't even care about him given one of the problems with LoK was the bloated cast. This is like saying that Kya and Bumi needed more screen time.
There is being involved, and then there is being "involved" to the plot at hand. But how does "tagging along" = building a closer relationship? Should we analyze everytime two characters are around one another, but do not interact much, or when they do, it's just for the issue at hand = building a closer relationship? Where is the actual dialogue outside of "business" dynamics? By business, I mean anything that pertains to the characters themselves and not the "business" around them?
what do you mean by saying that they didnt know what to do with her after book 1? did you forget about the subplot with varrick taking control over future industries and how asami was portrayed then? Did you forget about her importance to the main character AND the plot in book 4? quoting the creators on the origin of Asami only to twist it to your own baseless perception is pretty lame.
When they decided to make Asami a prominent character, it was apparently a good idea for her to become a part of some love triangle crap that we all hated in Book 1. In Book 2, yes she had her plot with Varrick, but once again, that whole plot was criticized, because it was basically a plot that in the end, had nothing to do with the bigger issue at hand (This also hurt Mako and Bolin's purpose as well). For some reason, they decided to use her for a love triangle again in Book 2 (seriously? What were they thinking?). In the Book 2 finale, she flew a plane and was then delegated to "Take care of Jinora".
In Book 3, I'm convinced they did not know what to do with her. They just said "eff it, let's just have her tag along and have a line here and there" for her. 90% of the things she did could have easily been done by a generic character.
Book 4 they finally had her do what she was good at, and that was engineering (last few episodes). But at the same time, she disappeared for several episodes or became backdrop material. How the hell did Wu get more screen time than Asami? Notice also how much more prominent Mako, Bolin, and Korra were featured compared to the 4th member of the Krew.
saying "this character only had X number of lines, therefore she's not important" is a misrepresentation of how the character was actually portrayed.
Seriously? I guess we'll just disagree on that point. If you're meant to be a prominent character, you don't get put in the background like that with few lines. Asami is the fourth Ghostbuster.
edit: also, just because these social issues have been addressed before in this medium doesn't mean that Korra isn't progressive.
I never said Korra wasn't progressive? Honestly, I thought Korra's PTSD/Mental issues were far better represented and progressive in that area. I'm just saying that if you're gonna go the route of homosexuality, there is already a precedent of one cartoon show (that I'm aware of), and other shows for that demographic that present itself rather openly to these issues. Not only those characters are developed better for those issues at hand, but because they openly show them in those social situations. I would say they are far more "progressive". Korra and Asami are progressive, but on a scale compared to these other shows, people need to stop making them out to be some mind blowing, "What is this? I have never seen this before in my life" nonsense.
Hell, Cardcaptor Sakura had a homosexual relationship. Sailor Moon did as well, and even when it made it over the states, it was such a fail in censoring it, that it was obvious.
And with that, I'm done. As Russel Peters put it, "Take it and go."