Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
First I'm going to interpret "once was" to mean "could be." If you literally meant once was, Sakurai could release an exact Melee replica and you'd be happy, but I suspect this is not the case. What you really want is a modified (perhaps slightly but still modified) version of Melee, which would in fact be better than it in some way, whether it would be in online capabilities, simply in roster selection, or much much more.It's just frustrating that I know how Smash can be gameplay-wise and knowing that it will most likely not be as good as it once was.
If you think that's all Melee has over Brawl you obviously don't have enough knowledge to add anything worthwhile to this discussion.When people say "as good as melee" is that code for "I want smash 4 to have wavedashing and L cancelling"?
If so, you're a god damn tool.
What else does it have over brawl then aside from a faster running speed and longer hit stun?If you think that's all Melee has over Brawl you obviously don't have enough knowledge to add anything worthwhile to this discussion.
I personally liked brawl better because I skipped the gamecube generation entirely (long story, don't ask) and played brawl first.
once I played melee, I couldn't get used to the faster falling speed and killed myself repeatedly. I often couldn't recover, in comparison to brawl, where I COULD recover and such. I would be able to do MUCH MORE in smash 64 or Brawl simply because I played them first, and the playstyle was more to my catering. therefore, I ended up liking brawl more, and I got really good at it.
I'm guessing that most melee players played melee first and couldn't get used to the slower speeds of brawl and therefore like it less, kinda like me with melee. I do think however, most melee players could lighten up and give brawl a chance, like I did with melee.
well, in my defense, I did start with 64. I just played Brawl long before melee, and the only thing I found wrong with it was tripping. then I went to melee and everything was really different from brawl, which is what I was used to, which made melee worse in my opinion. it's all about perspective.Most if not all Melee players started off with SSB64 and love that game just as much. Smash 64 was a great game and Melee was greater still. Brawl kicked all of that in the face. Starting with Brawl is a bad way to get into the franchise because it dumbs down and satisfies the needs of casual players to be able to be "good".
No magnet ledge grabbing, better edge game, superior air dodge, more distance at lower percentages, less campy, and no Metaknight, among other things.member: 217501"]What else does it have over brawl then aside from a faster running speed and longer hit stun?
This after your previous post:Also, as a rule of thumb. Adding snarky little remarks on the ends of your posts to try and insult people is not big or clever.
When people say "as good as melee" is that code for "I want smash 4 to have wavedashing and L cancelling"?
If so, you're a god damn tool.
well, in my defense, I did start with 64. I just played Brawl long before melee, and the only thing I found wrong with it was tripping. then I went to melee and everything was really different from brawl, which is what I was used to, which made melee worse in my opinion. it's all about perspective.
It's not that melee was bad, it's just that you can't really play melee like how you play brawl, and vice versa.
My point: Stop being hypocritical.So you did it because I did it?
My point still stands, if someone thinks melee is only good because of those 2 mechanics, they /are/ tools.
WORSE IN MY OPINION. WHICH MEANS I LIKE BRAWL MORE.You say it makes Melee worse which is an incorrect statement. You should of said "Is different from Brawl to which I am not used to". Melee from a game standpoint is completely superior to Brawl.
I never said that melee was a bad game. it's actually really good. why else would I buy it even after brawl?everything was really different from brawl, which is what I was used to, which made melee worse in my opinion.
But it doesn't make Melee WORSE you just DON'T LIKE it which is an OPINION.WORSE IN MY OPINION. WHICH MEANS I LIKE BRAWL MORE.
Also, I actually DID said something like what you said I should have said, if you were paying attention:
I never said that melee was a bad game. it's actually really good. why else would I buy it even after brawl?
now, if you anybody is not willing to co-operate, I might as well leave you close-minded melee fans here.
(I'm not saying all melee fans are close minded, just that some are)
fine, then in your opinion melee is better.But it doesn't make Melee WORSE you just DON'T LIKE it which is an OPINION.
The fact is Melee is NOT worse than Brawl, you just prefer Brawl.
This still happens in Brawl. You're never really going to stop this. People get just as upset when DDD is chain grabbing them across the stage as they do when getting dominated in Melee. In my experience even more so.That's where you're wrong.
It wasn't the not winning that hurt the casuals, it was the fact that it made it so that they felt POWERLESS to do anything other than be a punching bag.
This happened EVERY SINGLE TIME a casual would try to get into a competitive match, or whenever a pro would hop into a game full of less-experienced players.
fine, then in your opinion melee is better.
I really don't get what you are trying to say.
well, I can say the same thing about brawl. (except tripping. **** that)Haha I can see you are not quite getting it.
Melee is a BETTER game, this is a fact. The controls are smoother and more responsive, the physics are just right and everything works as it should.
Brawl has tripping, that's more than enough right there I don't need to explain any more.
You can PREFER to play Brawl but you CANNOT say it is a better game, when it isn't. I enjoy playing Brawl but it is no WAY a better game.
Smash died after melee now it is a former shell of greatness.
I meant progression i just worded it wrong the series has devolved.They why the ever loving **** are you even on the SSB4 threads then? No, seriously, why are you here? If Melee is the end all to be all game, then GTFO, this is for people who are actually looking forward to a new smash game, not a bunch of threads for you to extoll the virtues of Melee and talk about how this game will never be as good. There are other threads on this site for that, go to one of those.
I meant progression i just worded it wrong the series has devolved.
If the thread title was "Positive Features of Super Smash Bros. for WiiU and 3DS" you'd have a point. Right now you're telling people they're not allowed to express they're opinion because they are different than yours. News flash: you can't decide what people choose to express. You can't tell people to post on another thread when this one is entirely relevant and on topic with what Renji64 was implying. Nobody has to talk about only what you want to talk about. Learn to play nice Narcissist.They why the ever loving **** are you even on the SSB4 threads then? No, seriously, why are you here? If Melee is the end all to be all game, then GTFO, this is for people who are actually looking forward to a new smash game, not a bunch of threads for you to extoll the virtues of Melee and talk about how this game will never be as good. There are other threads on this site for that, go to one of those.
First I'm going to interpret "once was" to mean "could be." If you literally meant once was, Sakurai could release an exact Melee replica and you'd be happy, but I suspect this is not the case. What you really want is a modified (perhaps slightly but still modified) version of Melee, which would in fact be better than it in some way, whether it would be in online capabilities, simply in roster selection, or much much more.
I realize that we are in no way owed this, but it is frustrating knowing that it could exist and would make money but will in all likelihood not exist.Being frustrated by something that has the potential to exist failing to exist, but we are in no way owed, is one of the biggest problems with this community as a whole. Sure we are likely all guilty of this to some degree, but it should be to our shame.
Haha I can see you are not quite getting it.
Melee is a BETTER game, this is a fact. The controls are smoother and more responsive, the physics are just right and everything works as it should.
Brawl has tripping, that's more than enough right there I don't need to explain any more.
You can PREFER to play Brawl but you CANNOT say it is a better game, when it isn't. I enjoy playing Brawl but it is no WAY a better game.
If the thread title was "Positive Features of Super Smash Bros. for WiiU and 3DS" you'd have a point. Right now you're telling people they're not allowed to express they're opinion because they are different than yours. News flash: you can't decide what people choose to express. You can't tell people to post on another thread when this one is entirely relevant and on topic with what Renji64 was implying. Nobody has to talk about only what you want to talk about. Learn to play nice Narcissist.
And I'm sick of you being an anus about everything. Knock it off.I'm just sick of hearing how perfect Melee is.
And I'm sick of you being an anus about everything. Knock it off.
Melee is not perfect it has it's flaws but in they improved that formula instead of pretty much downgrading so bad for newer players and now trying to hit the reset button on the series. Who knows how amazing smash could have been.What...the...
Okay, so apparently it's okay to sit here degrading the new Smash Bros game while extolling how holy and perfect Melee is in a sub-section dedicated to information and peoples hopes for a new game? And I'M narcissistic? I haven't said the game is good or bad. I'm just sick of hearing how perfect Melee is.
Again, not everyone has to talk about what you want to talk about.Why, because I'd like to have discussions on a new Smash Brothers game without having to hear about an older one and how amazing it is?
Again, not everyone has to talk about what you want to talk about.
But this is a thread for Smash Brothers 4! Why would you talk about anything other than Smash Brothers 4 in a thread SPECIFICALLY FOR SMASH BROTHERS-
...
You're a troll. You have to be. No one can be that obstinate about trying to move the topic away from what it's supposed to be than a troll.
Well played good sir!
I have allot against this right here, for the longest time I was a casual player, heck still am basically as I have only recently try to get into the competitive scene and have only been to 1 Smashfest so far and won't be able to go again till next week, yet as a casual player I always prefered no items and bla bla bla and the reason I stayed casualy wa sbecause I had other people to play with at the time along with Wifi compatibla with Wii but since moving I lost both of thos things and I got tired og playing against the stupid CPU. But I never got Smash cause I wanted to play Mario VS Luigi I got Smash cause of the idea of it being different from other Fighting games as I was never any good at your typical fighting game with how they required, imo, to pull off absurd combos by moving the control stick a certain way (not just tilting it like in Smash) and then pressing like 7 friggen button very fast, I'm just not good at doing that. If I had tried to get into competitive Melee I probably wouldn't be here today because I am unable to pull of those kinds of combos, and believe I have tried. I actually prefer Brawl from a gameplay standpoint, sure the tripping is stupid but eh I get over it and deal with it, as you aren't always guaranteed to get in that combo or even have a clear victory. But hey I'm not looking for a Brawl 2.0 or anything nor a Melee 2.0. I am looking for Smash 4, it's own game that will not be clone of either game.Again, this is not the point. Adding these things I'm suggesting is NOT AT THE EXPENSE OF THE OTHER GROUP. Casuals do not care if you can wavedash or whatever. Like I said above, they do not give a crap about gameplay or anything. They want to play Mario vs. Luigi.
This is exactly what I prefer, perfect statement.I actually prefer Brawl from a gameplay standpoint, sure the tripping is stupid but eh I get over it and deal with it, as you aren't always guaranteed to get in that combo or even have a clear victory. But hey I'm not looking for a Brawl 2.0 or anything nor a Melee 2.2. I am looking for Smash 4, it's own game that will not be clone of either game.
But hey that's just me~
Aside form the "2.2" typo of mine.This is exactly what I prefer, perfect statement.