Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I watched the whole. thing.
Can you explain to me why they are not aloud if they are going to win?
You cant really lose on your own terms, someone basically forced you to die.
uhhIt's pretty simple: the game should be allowed to run its course unless both players (or the tournament rules) agree to the contrary. So if one player doesn't want to allow rage quit, for whatever capricious reasons, then that's that. So Yakal doesn't really need to explain anything; if he doesn't like it, he doesn't like it.
I'll offer some ideas for why it might be the case - though, as I say, these don't have to be convincing. For starters, not everyone is playing just to get better. They might actually enjoy the whole match process: the startup introduction as characters join the stage, and the closing screen. Maybe they love to hear ganondorf laugh, or to see how many whiffed grabs they had. Considering that, given the "normal" course of the match,the player will see this, the other player is preventing or interfering in his ability to do this if he rage quits.
As for the taunting, that is arguably part of the match. It is a move given to the every single character as part of their design. Clearly, it is dangerous to taunt, so if used at all it may have to be tactical. But in this sense it is "natural" and not superimposed.
So yeah, imo if even one person doesn't want the rage quit, it shouldn't be allowed for that match.
holy ****, he wrote a ****ing essay.It's pretty simple: the game should be allowed to run its course unless both players (or the tournament rules) agree to the contrary. So if one player doesn't want to allow rage quit, for whatever capricious reasons, then that's that. So Yakal doesn't really need to explain anything; if he doesn't like it, he doesn't like it.
I'll offer some ideas for why it might be the case - though, as I say, these don't have to be convincing. For starters, not everyone is playing just to get better. They might actually enjoy the whole match process: the startup introduction as characters join the stage, and the closing screen. Maybe they love to hear ganondorf laugh, or to see how many whiffed grabs they had. Considering that, given the "normal" course of the match,the player will see this, the other player is preventing or interfering in his ability to do this if he rage quits.
As for the taunting, that is arguably part of the match. It is a move given to the every single character as part of their design. Clearly, it is dangerous to taunt, so if used at all it may have to be tactical. But in this sense it is "natural" and not superimposed.
So yeah, imo if even one person doesn't want the rage quit, it shouldn't be allowed for that match.
and forget all problems
.
