Cold Beans
Smash Apprentice
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2007
- Messages
- 166
Dis is kindoff on the dumb side, becuase you can say thats ther be too many **** punch users.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Well guys, we can forget about Luigi. This game already has a plumber and 2 Italians, and we all know Nintendo is more than just Italian plumers.Brawl has enough sword users already, this game is to represent all of Nintendo and it's all -stars. Nintendo is more than just sword-users, even though they could make their movesets different and unique there are characters out there who could be more original and represent something else. Saki is a great example, he would have represented Sin & Punishment,he could have had a way unique moveset but he'd be just another sword user, samewith the other options (non-confirmed) they would be original in a sense but there's enough sword users already. Instead of Takamaru they could use someone better like Mach Rider, instead of another "sword user" they can use someone who can have a complete new fighting style.
Instead of another "swords-man" for Fire Emblem (especially FE) they could use someone way better and original. Of all series, Fire Emblem should be focused on more, people usually suggest Ike, Marth, and Sigurd not only is that stupid, lame, and dull but that is no where near representing Fire Emblem, that is stereotyping it.
I can't even read beyond that. It's just such an idiotic, biased, and ignorant statement.Brawl has enough sword users already
Brawl has enough sword users already
Yet people keep drawing him into this, lumping him with the sword users. That's exactly the point we're trying to make. Same goes for Ganondorf and Claus. Swords are a small part of their arsenal.Isaac shouldn't really even be a part of this debate.
His use of the sword is not prominent in the Golden Sun series at all.
i completely agree though...I think the main reason a lot of people don't want more sword-users is because they don't see anyway they could be unique. Why? Probably because half of the sword-users in Melee were clones.
I personally realize this is not the truth. Even Ike and Marth would play completely different due to their power and speed.
I also believe sword-using characters A moves should not be completely comprised of sword moves. Ganondorf for example, can and could easily use hand-to-hand combat and magic as well in his A moves. Isaac could easily integrate psynergy and djinn. This would be a way to add more variety to the move sets of sword-using characters.
Now as for FE, this presents a problem. Characters in the FE games are generally very constricted in their move sets. In their own games 3 is usually the most type of abilities a unit can use, even when fully promoted. Many characters, like Ike and Marth, can still only use one when fully promoted. Their move sets have to completely comprised of sword moves, both in A and B regards. That is why if a 3rd FE character gets in, I hope they are not a sword-user, or at least not someone who is primarily a sword-user (Someone who can only use swords after they promote for instance.) Having 3 FE characters who use swords for ALL of their moves would do a great disservice in misrepresenting the series.
do you mean completely sword reliant from FE?? Someone who wields and uses a sword for all attacks?? All Melee attacks?? or do you mean someone who has a sword and uses them for most/some of their attacksI'd say we could limit about ONE more sword reliant brawler, the first being Ike, and make Ike a counterpart.
I'm not saying Hector because he'd be another Ike... with axes.
I'm not against WW Link cuz he has a sword, I'm against WW Link because he's LINK, when we already have a Link. I see no purpose in AU versions of ANY character taking up a slot, no matter HOW different they are from their counterparts. They are the same character at heart, and it takes slots that could've went to a completely different character.WW Link and Link: the only thing they have in common is name.
WW Link: Wouldn't singularly rely on his sword. Megaton Hammer, Grappling Hook, Deku Leaf, hell, even the Telescope, would be involved in his moveset!
Isaac's other options make me even like him more.
And to courte: I mean someone like Ike,, by which I mean with a moveset that heavily depends on his sword, so someone else could be like him... by a maximum of ONE.
Just one.
That...is ********. How about more original character and less of other types. We don't need a ton of sword users and that's my opinion. I think it takes away from the uniqueness if you end up having like 1/4 as sword users. Don't give weak arguments. You even gave a weak argument to my well thought-out argument, further showing that you have no real point to make.and sinisterlizard, we're tired of the "Not Another Sword User" argument--we simply compliment a weak point with a weak rebuttal
Exactly, thats the fun part about Melee/Brawl. Instead of complaining about another character, learn how to approach and fight them.how about instead of no more swords, NO MORE WHINING and learn to play with and against sworded characters. Cmon, I've had infinite fun with Marth, YLink, Link, Roy and more recently Ike, Pit, and MOST OF ALL the uber awesome Meta Knight! Meta Knight is a hell of a lot of fun, and it wouldn't be that way without his sword :D