Tyranitarphantom
Smash Apprentice
+1
+1
-1
+1
-1
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Three votes only, buddy.Ness +1
Megaman +1
Luigi -1
Ganondorf -1
Pikachu +1
Almost half of the voters this period voted for their main (myself included). At this point I think it's reasonable to say that this is a problem.That people upvoting their mains. Come on, be objetive.
This is still going to sound biased, but I do firmly believe that Falco is at least mid-tier than low tier. Falco is a weird mix of himself and Wolf which sort of creates this issue of an "incomplete" character.Almost half of the voters this period voted for their main (myself included). At this point I think it's reasonable to say that this is a problem.
She's a slightly inferior Marth. You need to be able to space if you're a competitive player, thus if the tier list is talking about characters when used to their full potential, Lucina is inferior to Marth (unfortunately). I wish they'd give her some sort of buff so she's different from Marth and not outright worse.+1 still don't get why she so much further below marth. She's essentially marth without the need for spacing the tip and generally speaking i see more kills with lucina at like 90% then i do with marth.
I mean that's just it. if you can land those tips consistently then yes she is without a doubt worse than marth. but not at all by that much imo. from a logistical standpoint yes, at his best applies here, but where she stands on the list i feel is making her appear way worse than marth. imo she should be right below marth as a result.She's a slightly inferior Marth. You need to be able to space if you're a competitive player, thus if the tier list is talking about characters when used to their full potential, Lucina is inferior to Marth (unfortunately). I wish they'd give her some sort of buff so she's different from Marth and not outright worse.
Almost half of the voters this period voted for their main (myself included). At this point I think it's reasonable to say that this is a problem.
Hopefully people will read these posts and put their bias aside to make this list somewhat valid.Edit: That people upvoting their mains. Come on, be objetive.
>If any part of her sword hits a shield she's easily punished, unless its d-tilt.I mean that's just it. if you can land those tips consistently then yes she is without a doubt worse than marth. but not at all by that much imo. from a logistical standpoint yes, at his best applies here, but where she stands on the list i feel is making her appear way worse than marth. imo she should be right below marth as a result.
As a Shulk main, I never, repeating, never had any problem with D3. All his moves are easily predictable, bein very easy to knock him out with 50~80% dmg be simply counter-attacking him. I probably never saw a good D3 in For Glory, or if the MU against Shulk is just too insanely hard for him, but, as far as I played, D3 is medium to low tier.+1 Not sure why he's so low, people act like spamming the Gordo is his only playstyle, he can do a lot more things than just about everyone in the tier above him.
YepI honestly think anyone *****ing about someone else's preference for voting should be taken with a grain of salt. The OP said it first, basically vote for whoever the hell you want, for whatever reason you want.
No 'if's. No 'and's. No 'but's. Don't like it then you can counter our votes using your own or opt out of voting that period altogether.