aldelaro5
Paper Mario P
- Joined
- May 20, 2013
- Messages
- 9,724
- NNID
- aldelaro5
- 3DS FC
- 3050-7721-6617
I think Mario would get a Paper Mario game idk why not much predicted that for the mario thing
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Oh, I have a Wii U.If you have a Wii U, play Kung Fu Panda: Showdown of Legendary Legends.
If not, play Digimon Rumble Arena 2.
Or else play TMNT: Smash-Up. PTE copies the formula more closely, but it's arguably less playable than Smash-Up.
I mean.Don't forget a refined physics engine with better level design to accommodate it.
This alone would sell me.I don't even know what terms to even use at times.
I want a version of the game with updated graphics, maybe some better side content, Chao Gardens & Racings that have some online capability, and that raw glitchiness fixed.
And the Knuckles - Rouge Radar fixed for SA2.
I love uprising's single and multiplayer gameplay. It was pretty solid imo.Best smash clone is project M
>people dont like Uprising's gameplay
You have saddened me.
That reminds me, why is Silver so popular (ignoring the "EETZ KNOW YUUS!" meme)?
>im the only person who voted for tails out of 6
Yeah, reason I bring that up is because Sonic Adventure originally sported physics akin to the classics as evidenced by the design of the old Windy Valley and the test stages which had a ton of tests for rolling physics.I mean.
I feel like a lot of the issues with the physics was glitchiness.
But yeah.
That would be amazing.
IIRC he had one of the best character arcs in the Archie comics according to a lot of people.That reminds me, why is Silver so popular (ignoring the "EETZ KNOW YUUS!" meme)?
All I can ever see him as that guy who first appeared in a game that could've easily killed the Sonic the Hedgehog series.
Dr.Eggman, but Tails is a very close second.
Because the character has potential. The psychic powers would make for a great game on its own if done right.That reminds me, why is Silver so popular (ignoring the "EETZ KNOW YUUS!" meme)?
All I can ever see him as that guy who first appeared in a game that could've easily killed the Sonic the Hedgehog series.
1) Psychic powers are cool.That reminds me, why is Silver so popular (ignoring the "EETZ KNOW YUUS!" meme)?
All I can ever see him as that guy who first appeared in a game that could've easily killed the Sonic the Hedgehog series.
Because 90% of people won't bother.There are certain rules we have to follow at work, and if a customers transaction is against those rules we have to reject it.
Well, all the customer has to do is complain to a supervisor and they override it
It has happened like that so often a customer asked me when I bother rejecting it in the first place
Yeah, why do I bother?
He was popular enough for fan demand to be the reason he is still around, like with Shadow.1) Psychic powers are cool.
2) Archie did him better justice than 06.
3) I didn't even think he was that popular. Moreso than, say, Big, Cream, or Sticks... but Blaze always seemed to overshadow him of the duo. Edit: And certainly behind most of the "major" characters
Did you play the original?I'm so intimidated by the gameplay mechanics and the menu of Xenoblade X.
To be fair here that game was the next Alien game after the trainwreck that was Colonial Marines. People were going to be cautious as hell no matter what.Alien Isolation
Add one for Shadow. I just chose that DAMN fourth Strawpoll optionSo.
Results of the Sonic poll thing.
10 votes (71%) for Eggman.
3 votes (21%) for Tails
1 vote (7%) for Knuckles & Knuckles from K.N.U.C.K.L.E.S. (& Knuckles)
The people have spoken.
If you've ever played an MMO, you're set.I'm so intimidated by the gameplay mechanics and the menu of Xenoblade X.
I'm gonna put it as if Sonic games could still sell millions most cases right after 06 (Secret Rings was a year later and it sold tremendously for a Wii title) then so can Alien Isolation.To be fair here that game was the next Alien game after the trainwreck that was Colonial Marines. People were going to be cautious as hell no matter what.
Sonic fans are not at all like that. They are mostly one of the more cynical fanbases.I'm gonna put it as if Sonic games could still sell millions most cases right after 06 (Secret Rings was a year later and it sold tremendously for a Wii title) then so can Alien Isolation.
Although comparing Alien franchise to Sonic the Hedgehog is pretty stupid and insulting to the Alien fans.
Although a better comparison is Sonic and Star Wars considering both fanbases will buy any BS with that logo on there (see Battlefront)
Deer: Innocent Cinnamon Roll (Life)why did Gamefreak decide to pick a deer, an eagle, and a snake to be the Kalos legendary trio rather than going with something another trio of birds or dragons?
I still stand by the fact that that is complete inaccurate.So yesterday's Pokemon Z discussion was pretty interesting to say the least. From a talk about Zygarde in Smash, to the question of whether or not the Kalos Legends are actually rooted from Norse mythology, to a discussion about Diantha, I've gained several new topics that I'm interested in bringing forth to start discussions.
First question: If Xerneas, Yvetal, and Zygarde aren't truly based off Norse mythology despite the animals matching up (though their lore and nature aren't exactly the same), why did Gamefreak decide to pick a deer, an eagle, and a snake to be the Kalos legendary trio rather than going with something another trio of birds or dragons?
Likewise, it if's really a coincidence that Zygarde's forms match up with the Children of Loki, why did Gamefreak decide to have a dog, a snake, and a humanoid figure be each of Zygarde's forms rather than going with something like three different snake forms?
This large question has got me thinking today, and it's made me really curious to hear what are people's thoughts about it.
I'll bring the second question later.
When Sonic Storybook Series (both games) sell a million copies, Sonic Unleashed does as well and Sonic 4 Episode 1 too all each sell a million copies, when they are considered bad, why do people ignore that?Sonic fans are not at all like that. They are mostly one of the more cynical fanbases.
I seriously don't know where this "all Sonic fans will buy anything Sonic" stereotype comes from. Especially considering just how hard that is to do from a financial standpoint.
It's 2016, it's literally more than 10 years too late to still be trying to use the Sonic fan base as the butt of every joke.
Unleashed isn't bad.When Sonic Storybook Series (both games) sell a million copies, Sonic Unleashed does as well and Sonic 4 Episode 1 too all each sell a million copies, when they are considered bad, why do people ignore that?
I'm a Sonic fan but it's an easy target because how overall bad looking the fanbase is. The one time they said enough was enough was with Sonic Boom but that was also due to being an exclusive to the struggling Wii U.
It seem that way because why does these supposedly bad games keep selling as well as they do?
well first imo zygarde is most like a flatwormFirst question: If Xerneas, Yvetal, and Zygarde aren't truly based off Norse mythology despite the animals matching up (though their lore and nature aren't exactly the same), why did Gamefreak decide to pick a deer, an eagle, and a snake to be the Kalos legendary trio rather than going with something another trio of birds or dragons?
Likewise, it if's really a coincidence that Zygarde's forms match up with the Children of Loki, why did Gamefreak decide to have a dog, a snake, and a humanoid figure be each of Zygarde's forms rather than going with something like three different snake forms?cuz they look cool
the giant doesn't even really have much to do with hel
she's just kinda... this lady
no wings or tail or mitre
Everyone but Mario, Zelda, Pokemon and FE diesHere's a thing to do.
Every series in Smash.... Predict what will happen to them in 2016.
Go.
Who hired George Lucas to make the XCX's NPCs?jarjars
Where did the "it's just a coincidence" thought even come from?So yesterday's Pokemon Z discussion was pretty interesting to say the least. From a talk about Zygarde in Smash, to the question of whether or not the Kalos Legends are actually rooted from Norse mythology, to a discussion about Diantha, I've gained several new topics that I'm interested in bringing forth to start discussions.
First question: If Xerneas, Yvetal, and Zygarde aren't truly based off Norse mythology despite the animals matching up (though their lore and nature aren't exactly the same), why did Gamefreak decide to pick a deer, an eagle, and a snake to be the Kalos legendary trio rather than going with something another trio of birds or dragons?
Likewise, it if's really a coincidence that Zygarde's forms match up with the Children of Loki, why did Gamefreak decide to have a dog, a snake, and a humanoid figure be each of Zygarde's forms rather than going with something like three different snake forms?
This large question has got me thinking today, and it's made me really curious to hear what are people's thoughts about it.
I'll bring the second question later.
well first imo zygarde is most like a flatworm
you can particularly see this with its core form - it's like a planarian or something
in any case, the bit of norse mythology involving the eagle and the deer is really dang obscure
i mean yeah, gf/tpc have referenced myths and folklore in stuff before. there are like 30+ things from japanese myths, the musketeers, the weather trio, whatever
but all of those (even ziz) are relatively well-known parts of mythology
also i'd question where ratatoskr is. he's a pretty important part of the whole yggdrasil thing, especially compared to the random deer