Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This isn't really like Nintendo, usually they put time and effort into their games for the Holiday season rather then rushing them out the door.
It's been rushed out the door in an unpolished and incomplete state ala Sonic 06'.
Besides it being different reviewers like Kenith pointed out, people are fully liable to judge games differently over 10 years later, opinions and tastes change over time, and problems with games can become more apparent when revisiting them. So no, even if IGN was a single entity, an old review on the original not mentioning the water doesn't devalue the criticism of the remake now.
There's just not a lot to do compared to the previous ones (except Open) it seems.
Unpolished from a gameplay standpoint? Are the mechanics themselves busted?
Do you know what was removed?
Huh, I guess so, opinions do change over time so it actually wouldn't be suprising if it hasn't aged well at least in their opinion.
http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/...rio-tennis-ultra-smash-wii-u-hands-on-preview
Could you please stop excuse me of blind fanboyism, when I'm saying the wording of what IGN said is what the problem is, and nothing else. I'm not saying ORAS is perfect, cause it isn't, at all.
The SA games haven't particularly aged well, the audio and voice acting in particular.
What does this video have to do with your post...at all?
Except you were trying to argue that "too much water" isn't a valid criticism, on some inane basis of "the setting can't be criticized". And if you want to argue wording now, "too much water" was in the summary section where they succinctly summarize the main pros and cons in a few words, where "too much water" perfectly describes the problem in the most concise manner.
It's a joke video which somewhat references how the audio fequently cuts out in the game. The audio isn't very good actually, but I have a video that actually shows its problems in a nutshell. As a parody.
Oh...nevermind then.
Agree...
Also the first game apparently had its audio directly translated from the Japanese version, resulting in its infamous delivery. It's up there with Resident Evil and Castlevainia Symphony of the Night imo.
Independent reviewers are usually chill and stress that it's just their opinion, so I like hearing them too. Some review sites can just be plain disrespectful and arrogant, which just leaves them in a very bad light.
That is a ridiculous exaggeration.
Thing is, I only own two FE games, those being Radiant Dawn and Awakening, so I'm not too knowledgeable on the series overall.
What?
I highly recommend using the Wii U eshop to get 7,8 and 11
I never read their SLW review
I wasn't actually trying to go for accuracy, I just found a game that was rushed and decided to compare it to another game that was rushed. It's that simple.
7 to me means 'It's an okay game with more pros than cons' so above average
I actually played LL. That game will change you.
LL? Which means?
The Lost Levels. The hardest Mario game ever. (If you don't count SMM or Kaizo)
I don't have a Wii U, so that's not an option for me... yet.
I didn't see it that way, especially when that guy is always saying things like that. Like recently he was going on about how the Wii U is a terrible console with only 2 good games or something and seemed completely serious. So it really seems to me that he legitimately thinks those things and backtracks afterward.
