- Joined
- Aug 13, 2001
- Messages
- 34,381
- Location
- Cull Hazard
- NNID
- Irene4
- 3DS FC
- 1203-9265-8784
- Switch FC
- SW-7567-8572-3791
Yeah, I don't buy any of this as legitimately true use of trailers. Trailers are still worthless when it comes to the final quality. And always will be. It can be worse or better. They're small snippets of what becomes of changed items. Sonic 06 had a far amazing trailer than the actual game was, and that's from a fan of the game. I was fairly disappointed, but I still enjoyed it for other various reasons.
Unleashed I was vastly disappointed in, as it didn't have anything majorly fun anymore. It killed the multiplayer, one of the best points of Sonic games lately, especially when the single player has issues, the Day Stages were honestly rather trashy with awful level design and a hard to control Sonic. The Werehog was overall better, due to better controls, but also was weak as hell and had other issues, namely the levels were also badly designed. The Tails stages were awful and barely playable. The hub was the most playable part. And I paid full price for it. -_- I would've enjoyed it if had a real multiplayer, which saves a ton of Sonic games. At least other people can enjoy it. It still had great music and a great story, but it pretty much had serious issues beyond that. And I did see trailers for it before. I was vastly wrong on how good it could be, as the trailers made it look way better than it ultimately was.
Trailers aren't good enough to judge the final product.
But it's not like you should spend money on something if you think you won't like it. Cause anybody still thinking that's my argument is clearly not reading what I'm saying. What I said was that your opinion of the final product cannot be judged from a trailer alone. Your opinion on it should not be taken into consideration, only those who actually saw it. The opinion of the trailer is fine to make. Not wanting to see it is fine. Trying to make a controversy off of a trailer is not really fine, especially when it gets you money for doing so. All he had to do was tweet or not bother to say anything about it.
And no, it doesn't matter if he's a fan or not. That's what Twitter is for. Making videos is for the ad revenue and the money he gets off of the controversy. He damn well knew what he was doing. If anything, what he didn't know was that idiots would start threatening him. But he knew controversy would be there, easily. Nothing justifies the threats, but nothing justifies him getting money off of a useless video either. Disabling the comments is the best thing to do in this case, and if it means people won't take what he said about an entire movie(which he hasn't seen whatsoever) seriously, that's a good thing. It's not like he can judge the literal movie for anything other than "I'd rather avoid it", which is fine. Declaring he won't make a review? Okay, nobody should care anyway. If nobody asked, then nobody ultimately cared in the long run. People care because there's a controversy gathered due to the video. And that became the problem that caused more issues. Alternatively, he could just remove the video and let everything die down, like it should've.
...Well, I've finally read something that just made me facepalm at how absurd it is.
Movies do not hurt people. That's a vast exaggeration of the problem and you know it. Seriously, you're still completely ignoring my point entirely. This has nothing to do with wanting to actually see the movie whatsoever. It's whether you should bother to talk about reviewing a movie you've never seen.
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
