This.Or because it's a legitimately high quality series.
Nintendo doesn't need controversy to sell. What a crazy thing to say.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This.Or because it's a legitimately high quality series.
'Featuring Animal Crossing Yakuza! Now you play as Tom Nook, and you break everyone's kneecaps!'This.
Nintendo doesn't need controversy to sell. What a crazy thing to say.
I'd just make Lucas invulnerable.I'd make the best balance patches ever.
I'd turn Pac-Man into Brawl Meta Knight and make Falcon's jab a one hit KO move.
And you'll like it.
If they have amiibo's on there.In other news, Nintendy is gonna have their own Black Friday soon
http://happyholidays.nintendo.com/cyber-deals
That's exciting. There's a few indie games I've been waiting to go on sale, so hopefully they'll be part of this.In other news, Nintendy is gonna have their own Black Friday soon
http://happyholidays.nintendo.com/cyber-deals
>no information on Amiibos for Little Mac, Robin and Wii Fit TrainerIn other news, Nintendy is gonna have their own Black Friday soon
http://happyholidays.nintendo.com/cyber-deals
Have you tried Toys 'R' Us for Little Mac? Him, Shulk, Villager, Captain Falcon, & Greninja got restocks there not too long ago.>no information on Amiibos for Little Mac, Robin and Wii Fit Trainer
You see Nintendo, I'm trying to give you my money but you can't help me out.
I guess you don't need my money
I have - but it's been a while. So, yes, that was a poor point. You didn't need to be as rude as you were about it, but that seems to be a trait in your posts."Futuristic"
Bruh, you've clearly never played Halo. Most of the UNSC's weapons use bullets. Changing that is stepping all over the lore of the franchise and bound to piss off the majority of the fanbase.
This goes back to that whole censorship deal.
Don't.touch.it.
Plus, I doubt M$ would ever allow Chief to get in if Nintendo isn't gonna allow him to have his trademark guns.
Only reason those changes worked for Snake is cause non-lethal runs are encouraged in MGS, and stealth is prefered over confrontation. The entirety of Snake's moveset is Stealth-based, even with the explosives. And the weapons he does get are among the most iconic of the franchise, with the RPG being used in the boss fight against the HIND in MGS1, and at tge end of MGS2, the Nikita being a series staple, and Grenades and C4s being exemplary of syealth-based takedowns.
Taking the BR and SMGs from Chief is like taking away Link's sword and bow.
EDIT:
Also,
"His guns don't look realistic"
Except for the part that they totally do:
They're based off real weapons. And Chief's armor is being used as a source of inspiration for real combat armor for troops by DARPA. It's futuristic, but it's far from unrealistic. Sci-fi is always grounded in reality.
Maybe the people supporting Master Chief should play the Halo series before saying dumb things.
People on the internet respectful? good luck with that one.That's exciting. There's a few indie games I've been waiting to go on sale, so hopefully they'll be part of this.
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/earthbound-sequel-mother-3-confirmed-for-wii-ubut-/1100-6432254/
I'm sure this was talked about and I missed it, but people should prepare to respectfully campaign heavily on the Miiverse page and social media to get the game localized in 'Murica and Europe. It worked before, and it will again with the right demand, even if it takes six months or a year. Just keep it respectful.
Im anxious to see the Eshop deals ;-; Why do we have to wait until he 25th to view them?In other news, Nintendo is gonna have their own Black Friday soon
http://happyholidays.nintendo.com/cyber-deals
You want me to trust freaking Toys R Us?Have you tried Toys 'R' Us for Little Mac? Him, Shulk, Villager, Captain Falcon, & Greninja got restocks there not too long ago.
They're from the materia that's in Cloud's Buster Swordwhere are these from?
Except it's not.Wow... :/
Nice generalizing there.
Oh, it's not farfetched in the least. It's an understandable conclusion. It simply shouldnt be assumed to be true. There are a ton of factors to consider.Considering the reasons for censoring a lot of the other content both in this game as well as previous ones is to appeal to a family friendly images, as well as avoid offending an overly sensitive culture that is bound to start controversy over nothing, I feel it's not too farfetched to assume the boobslider bit falls into a similar category.
Controversy can be good. It can also be bad. It depends on the results of the controversy. I mean you consider censorshio controversal, but I doubt you consider it a good thing.Deal is, Nintendo needs to realise controversy is good. That's literally why GTA even sells in the first place.
I completely agree. But sometimes you're screwed either way. And sometimes it's best to not do something in the first place. We wouldnt be having this convo if we didnt have a build-your-hero protagonist. Almost every decision is double edged.Anyway, I was just spinning PC thinking on itself. Their rationale is "change this cause it's offensive" when in fact, the very act of removing something to appeal to a specific group can be offensive in an of itself.
I mostly agree. Simply following and spewing what you hear is a bad idea; this is coming from a Christian. But thinking and coming to one's own conclusion doesnt mean that suddenly everyone will agree either. Instead of illogical people arguing and almost never agreeing, you'll have logical people arguing and almost never agreeing.Ofc, you can't expect conformist hipsters and social activists to have much in the way of critical thinking skills. They're just blindly following others to fit in by not fitting in and not really paying attention to the **** they're spewing (this is why feminism fails on so many levels).
I posted in the wrong thread on thisSo here's a quick question.
Do you think future Smash DLC will be 100% third parties, and why? And would you approve of it?
Just gathering opinions.
TL;DR: I do not think it would make sense to be 100% third partySo, apparently, there's people (at my surprise) that would disagree with this, but I don;t think all the three slots including cloud would be all third party.
I just don;t think it would make much sense. Cloud being in ballot to me make sense, what wouldn’t make sense is systematically choose the ballot to be third party only for ssb4 (and I guess keep the rest for future games). See, there;s some reasons that I just don;t think it could make sense.
First, these 3 slots appeared even before the ballot ended with the first 2 were seen really early (so early that I think you could say they got added as the ballot started or even before). If they intended to only have third party on all ballot slots (because the ballot was certainly planned before), how could they actually know there would be at least 2 good candidate?
Because if you think about it, they have to do the ballot to get reliable data, they won;t assume the data before it comes. That would remove the point of doing a ballot, they really had to do the ballot before knowing this.
Adding a third slot a bit after (although, idk if we can safely say it happened right on the update that it was discovered) raises the suspicions even more. They would have had to know 2 third party was going in the ballot and while the ballot would happen add a third slot OR they intended to have 3 slots which makes even less sense if the third party theory is true and the paragraph I just said before.
Basically, no matter when the third slots was added, it all comes down to they had to know the data before, but this just removes the point of the ballot.
So it had to be decided after the ballot, but then I still have a very weird feeling.
Why exactly would they ever do this on a ballot that actually was meant for any valid character? I mean, they will only keep this data "in case" future game happens, but the reality is no one know if they will exist. Not that they won;t happen, but it;s not decided if there will be one so leaving the entire ballot to be third party with the intend to have the first party get in future game is VERY weird.
Cause that logic would assume they know they are making another game, but isn't sakurai a third party dev? Because once the dlc ends for this game......it just ends, his job would be done. Like seriously, unless he signed another contract (which I REALLY doubt at this point), he wouldn;t know if he would work on future smash game aka why would they split the third party and first party choices NIOW?
Sorry @PushDustIn but after thinking about it, I just have to disagree here, I don;t see how it would make sense.
No because not having any 1st party newcomers would be crazyDo you think future Smash DLC will be 100% third parties, and why? And would you approve of it?
No because not having any 1st party newcomers would be crazyAnd would you approve of it?
Sure you do.I look at the facts
iirc, It's $13.99 (the normal MSRP price of a Smash amiibo)You want me to trust freaking Toys R Us?
Cmon man
If it's more than $12 then I ain't buying
No and no.So here's a quick question.
Do you think future Smash DLC will be 100% third parties, and why? And would you approve of it?
Just gathering opinions.
EDIT: Wait, missed the "DLC" part. Well, my answer is still the same, though it's not as definite.Masahiro Sakurai said:Smash Bros. can still be considered as an all-star collection of Nintendo characters. Just like with Mega Man or any other third-party character, it would have to be a very special situation.
Adding third-party characters should be considered a very special case. In the last game, when we added Sonic and Snake, there were lots of different hoops to jump through as far as getting approvals and making sure all the parties involved were happy with the way things went. You can consider it a very special circumstance for that to happen. Even in cases like adding Pokemon characters, there are a lot of parties involved and there’s a lot of wrangling. It’s much tougher than people can imagine. I know lots of people have requests and their own ideas about third-party characters that would work, but I want people to understand that adding a third-party character like Mega Man is a very special situation.
But it's not broken...?We might get some good balance patches if they were allowed to speak up a bit on how to fix some stuff.
Since you love long debates about SJWs and sexism so much, why don't you go hang out in this thread:Except it's not.
Feminism has never been about equal rights. Even though it claims to be about gender rights, it's never bothered with men's rights, and it's never extended it's goals outside of first world "problems."
View attachment 82737
I judge an ideology based on it's results, not on what it pretends to do. Both feminism and MRA are equally misguided.
Being against an ideology that is clearly self-interested doesn't mean you're against equality, doesn't mean you're sexist and doesn't mean you're bigoted. I look at the facts, not at misinformation and propaganda. "The patriarchy" isn't a thing, and we need to pull our heads out if the sand if we wanna evoke true equality.
You don't understand how marketing works.Or because it's a legitimately high quality series.
I actually really liked the artwork he did for Dissidia, especially Garland who didn't have any real Amano concept art of his normal form and Nomura had to mostly do from scratch. I think he's usually crapped on because the designs he does nowadays aren't exactly original or inspiring. But I think he did the Dissidia artwork very well and that the meld between his artwork and Amano's artwork was nicely done. And like I said, I really like his design for Garland. If he does do a poster for Smash Bros. and it's anything close to his Dissidia, than I'm A-okay.That reminds me.
I hope Nomura draws the newcomer art for him, I know everyone is kinda sick of him and his anime artstyle but [shrug emoji].
Sorry from the late response, where did you guys get the stock icon from? Is it fan made at all?hype boiz!
Can't wait till he gets released
:4 cloud:Sorry from the late response, where did you guys get the stock icon from? Is it fan made at all?
And im definitely not dropping a character from my favorite game ever for a game ive never played.I totally am not dropping Lucina from a character from a game I've never played based on one trailer. Nuh uh.
Since you love long debates about SJWs and sexism so much, why don't you go hang out in this thread:
http://smashboards.com/threads/sexi...al-and-character-design.422551/#post-20404436
I'm sure they'd be more willing to entertain this than we are.
That's why Hatred is the top selling game of all timeYou don't understand how marketing works.
"Doesn't matter what people say about you so long as they're talking about you."
Controversy always gets people talking, and always sparks human curiousity. More controversy = more sales, this is a fact.
Controversy is not always a good thing, especially if you just go for it just for the sake of it. Yeah, you want people to talk about you and sometimes it is a good thing to push what's accepted, but it's not always and sometimes what is controversial is what leads to your product bombing. For example, that's one of the reasons why Metroid Other M is one of the least successful games in the franchise and Nintendo considered it a failure, the controversy and bad word of mouth caused people to stay away from it.You don't understand how marketing works.
"Doesn't matter what people say about you so long as they're talking about you."
Controversy always gets people talking, and always sparks human curiousity. More controversy = more sales, this is a fact.
Hatred confirmed GOTYThat's why Hatred is the top selling game of all time