Hi, reminder that something is very wrong
Yeah, I feel that this meme will just help me get over the disbelief I lived yesterday like omg, I can;t believe how bill accidentally told the entire impression most fans would have on that game
However, I thought about it and there is 2 points I should address that i don;t feel I was clear in my original rant (which you can read here,, no salt included details inside
http://smashboards.com/threads/nint...ews-salt-swamp.422414/page-1521#post-20956574 ).
First, remember that I employed expressions like "most likely" in that post because truth is, nothing of what I believe this game are fact. However, they are all deduction which I have so much convinction in them that i jsut predict with them. To give you an idea, msot of what I said in that I rant, I am 90% convinced it;s goign to go like this and probably worse.
I mean I want to clear things up:
@Radical Beam brought this up a couple times, but it is true that i did a 180 on spm (not that I hated it, but I was very hesitant). however do you knwo why I eventually questioned these doubts???
The artstyle. I looked at the game and then I realised there mgiht be a contradiction with my doubts becuase the game looked paper mario. Then I was told that the platofrming part isn;t really true platforming like main mario games so this is how I came to play it.
What happened with SS is I KNEW I would at least not like it, maybe hate it (it turned out to be the later) because everything I heard about it were verifiable and jsut made no sense to me. It's like, I could indeed verify that the battles doesn't give you EXP and that you only use stickers......which does raise questions in my head and I don;t need to play the game to ask these questions. Or I could verify that indeed the plot is.....not there and everything most people complained about it. The ONLY reason i bougth it full price is to type a huge essay so that I could understand what was wrong IN DEPTH and share it so that it would lead people to think about stuff they might not have saw (also it feels good to do this). Not to mention that interview btw.
And by the way, that SS review, now that I think about it, might be one of the best post I did, I really think I got the most to the point and in depth about it, i even had to define terms because it is not easy to explain people why I coudln't find what the game really is. So it is very fair to say that the reasons SS wasn;t liked and was hated with imo legit reasons......they are VERY known to me (serious I keep mentioner them so much that it became a joke).
The point I am trying to make here is I had enough even if it;s a single minute to safely deduce things. What actually should have happened is me being so clueless that I wouldn;t be able to predict any concrete things. The idea is that if it was new or it was coming back to its root, that means that the previous reasons about SS and the past game.....irrelevant, they wouldn’t matter because it would be clear the game is going to a different path.
But this is not what happened. What happened is in one minute, all the game showed was it was branching the SS path that I know way too well. They even showed basic things, that should not be obvious unless the game was globally having that SS feel and sometime, worse. heck even my doubts on paper jam, this si nothing compared to now because the paper jam was first I was confused it wasn;t paper mario then realised it didn;t matter than realised that the game MAY be too SS ey and then realised, they had to anyway and it;s renewed so that it;s better (imo still).
This is more like it IS a paper mario game, it DOES matter becuase it;s an entry to the series and it IS too ss ey SO FAR.
So I get when people come with "too early to judge", the truth is I am not really blind here, I give educated deduction which is not the same as say the spm hate where it basically got down to it;s not like TTYD.....that is what I call judging. If you don;t think i know enough, fine, anyway i will wait like everyone, but I am telling it is very unlikely that I chnage my opinion as I learn from it.
The second thing (yeah I had to talk a lot abotut he first one) is abotu......how "something is very wrong"......ok guys, this meme is too good seriously!
....Anyway
what I mean by this is that let me just ask the question that most people have on their back of their head.....
WHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY?????????????????
I mean you truly have to wonder why it came down to this. I was convinced it woudln;t happen myself so let me try to show what I think I noticed.....a contradiction even.
there might be for pm64, but for TTYD and spm, there was quotes or reasons to suggest that IS or nintendo enjoyed to make the games. there probably was for pm64 given how weird that dev cycle went, but my point is that I felt nintendo was happy to do this series until spm. Even one guy at treehouse said at the E3 show in 2015 while talking about Paper Jam that "Super Paper Mario is one of my favourite game I ever worked on, I loved writing that game". The truth is, i don;t think he lied, the writing in spm is praised with reaosns so i can see why a translator would jsut love to do that.
But I also never heard about SS being an enjoyment to do, in fact, I felt it wasn;t even mentioned much. it's as if SS was the point where the series would start to fade out from its original intent. we know that Myamoto is the main actor of this situation, but what about color splash? We know nothing, well it;s likely IS is developing the game, but what if the SS situation happened again? if IS originally didn;t wanted SS to be like this why would they want this game to be like that?
I hope I can eventually get these answers in an interview or anything, but right now, it seems that the paper amrio series has completely got thorwn away its fundations imo.