Diddy Kong
Smash Obsessed
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2004
- Messages
- 26,308
- Switch FC
- SW-1597-979602774
Sakurai is really interested in adding Dark Pit.. :0
Maybe. It's far more likely to happen than Goku at least.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Sakurai is really interested in adding Dark Pit.. :0
IN 1080P HD with SUPER DUPER PROCESSING POWER!!!Sonic Lost world looks legit.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/06/07/e3-2013-exploring-sonic-lost-world
It's pretty much Super Sonic Galaxy
Nintendo has figured out how to do BLAST PROCESSING! Lol! Remember those commercials?? It's almost surreal to see Sonic being a Nintendo exclusive now.IN 1080P HD with SUPER DUPER PROCESSING POWER!!!
Some are suspect. I can guarantee you that Pluto and Minnie Mouse would have to be in it.Version 2 of my Disney roster, 25 characters Added.
View attachment 801
That rule was for your Roger Rabbit idea (not my disney roster), so I Should have made it clearer that that comment was meant as a joke.Then replace him with Iron Man/Tony Starks. There's no need for Disney channel characters...
I'm not entirely sure.I though it was only partially owned by Warner Bros...
I hope NOT! A brotha wants his DK64 sequel!I bet we'll see more Sonic games than DK, Kirby and Metroid games on Wii U now.
And no, am not happy with that.
I Hope not! a Brotha wants his DK64 sequel!
Sonic should say "BLAST PROCESSING" a lot. That or Ezio, Captain America (from the new Avengers TV show), or Chris Redfield, all of whom, like Sonic now, are voiced by Roger Craig Smith!!! By the way, I think he is the best Sonic voice actor ever!!!Nintendo has figured out how to do BLAST PROCESSING! Lol! Remember those commercials?? It's almost surreal to see Sonic being a Nintendo exclusive now.
False, it was the 2nd Disney animated movie (after Snow White).Pinocchio would also be a lock since it was the first Disney movie ever.
Didn't someone from Hudson or Camelot say that they wanted to make a a DK64 sequel? It may actually happen this gen. Lemme try to find the link.This should totally happen. But am affraid it won't. :/ Nintendo will probably think it's fine releasing a new DKC in like, another 10 years now that they have a titleaka porton the 3DS.
Good, because everything on the Disney channel is my enemy (sans the actually good Disney movies they occasionally show).That rule was for your Roger Rabbit idea (not my disney roster), so I Should have made it clearer that that comment was meant as a joke.
DC Comics is owned by Time Warner, which owns the Warner Bros. brand. I guess I got that one wrong!I'm not entirely sure.
Disney vs. Warner Bros vs. Viacom vs. Jump Superstars vs. Nintendo vs. Sony vs. Microsoft vs. Apple vs. The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones vs. the AARP!!!Someone should make a parody game of this similar to Smash Crusade or Super Smash Flash.
Didn't someone from Hudson or Camelot say that they wanted to make a a DK64 sequel? It may actually happen this gen. Lemme try to find the link.
Edit: Here we go: http://mynintendonews.com/2012/07/05/camelot-wants-to-make-a-donkey-kong-64-sequel/
If was making a realistic roster it would be very different.Some are suspect. I can guarantee you that Pluto and Minnie Mouse would have to be in it.
Pinocchio would also be a lock since it was the first Disney movie ever.
Well, I am known as the Super Saiyan in training on my Youtube account.Quit tormenting the super saiyan.
I think DKC Returns' massive sales will make Nintendo make a sequel, and expand upon the Donkey Kong (Country) brand.This should totally happen. But am affraid it won't. :/ Nintendo will probably think it's fine releasing a new DKC in like, another 10 years now that they have a titleaka porton the 3DS.
Disney vs. Disney you say=??? PROSPEROUS!!! Although, does Disney have a right to use Star Wars properties in games after their deal with Electronic Ten Arses=???Well I say stick with Disney for just now. Disney vs. WB would have to be massive. Disney has enough on its own and I totally forgot about the LucasFilms IP now being under Disney.
Yeah, but with Nintendo starting to pair up with other dev's to make their games like Team Ninja to make Other M (Bad example ), or Namco to make SSB4; OR the recent Fire Emblem X Shin Megami with ATLUS!Well, they only said they'd like to do it. Am not having too high hopes. Even though I'd trust Camelot more than anyone at this moment with the series.
Smash should always be #1... but after seeing the list, it makes sense why it's not. It should, however, still be in the top 3, especially with a trailer confirmed!
Isn't Ground Zeroes the and Phantom pain the same game???Nintendo has some really unique partnerships with some really good 3rd party companies, which I really like. Series like Bayonetta, Scribblenauts, Castle FREAKING VANIA, Sonic, and so forth are awesome to have.
Smash should always be #1... but after seeing the list, it makes sense why it's not. It should, however, still be in the top 3, especially with a trailer confirmed!
Here's the Game Trailers Top Ten Most Anticipated Games for E3 list:
10. Destiny (Bungie): Should be WAYYYYYYYY higher!!!
9. The Evil Within (Bethesda Softworks): Eh, seems like the right spot. Maybe the tenth spot would be better suited for it.
8. Batman: Arkham Origins (Warner Bros. Montreal): Should be a spot or two higher IMO.
7. Super Smash Bros. Wii U (Namco Bandai/Nintendo): They just say they don't like not knowing, they want info, they wanna know how much influence Namco Bandai is having on the game, and they want to know if this game will be "the second coming of Melee." That actually makes sense why this is so low on the list.
6. Deep Down (Capcom): Honestly, it's more the graphics than anything that put it here.
5. Thief (Square Enix): I can see why this is this high, but I think it is too high, especially since Square Enix has had many letdowns lately.
4. Super Mario Wii U (Nintendo): Should be 2nd on the list IMO.
3. Dark Souls II (Namco Bandai): I get this ones' spot, but above Mario=???
2. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (CD Project Red): They put this here because the franchise is finally in a open world setting.
1. Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain: Honestly, I'd rather put Ground Zeroes here, but I get this #1 pick, and I kinda agree with it.
Overall, this top ten most anticipated games for E3 list makes a lot of sense, and all the games belong here, but I disagree with a lot of the order. I also doubt that the #1 game (MGS5) will get too much new footage, as I think MGS: Ground Zeroes (it's prequel) will get more footage shown, and be more of the focus.
No, though Kojima has admittedly been somewhat confusing on that point. Ground Zeroes is a prologue game to MGSV.Isn't Ground Zeroes the and Phantom pain the same game???
No, Ground Zeroes takes place about 7 years before the Phantom Pain. In a gap of about 6 years between the game, Big Boss is in a coma. The thing I think that draws them to Phantom Pain is that Big Boss will begin hallucinating, and face more.... "mythical" enemies, as shown in the trailer(s) thus far.Isn't Ground Zeroes the and Phantom pain the same game???
I don't think Deep Down will be that great, because I have little to no faith in Capcom. As for Arkham Origins, that game looks AWESOME!!!I agree though Batman: Origins should be way higher.
Deep down, i'm interested in seeing but not so interested over smash bros, but hey that's just me.
I think that is more because Game Trailers liked Mario Galaxy 1 and 2 more than Brawl, and I can't really blame them.Super Mario Wii U above Smash Bros.? Are people really that much more pumped for that than Smash? I mean, 3D Mario games are beautiful, but Smash is the Nintendo pantheon series that boasts the greatest amount of content and replay-ability. It's not impossible for me to fathom, but it just seems somewhat surprising.
On top of that, in many aspects, Brawl was a failure. The game felt more constricted than Melee. It actually process less stuff than Melee with its' then "current" graphics (obviously that doesn't count on Melee stages in the game), the online was awful, and really all the bonus modes had less stuff or less enjoyable stuff than Melee. Plus there was crap like tripping, loads of crappy exploits that make the game less enjoyable for everyone, Meta Knight being so overpowered he's banned in many regions/tournaments, and the general consensus outside of the Brawl players that the game is boring to watch competitively. Oh, and no real spikes.Ah, I guess I was forgetting that this was a list of what they themselves most look forward to. That makes a lot more sense then.
Take Quantam of Solace out of the equation, and I will agree with you one hundred percent.By the way, the recent trilogy of Daniel Craig James Bond video games would make a PERFECT SUCCESSOR to GoldenEye if done right. That needs to be a video game already, and it needs to be good, and I don't even care who makes it (so long as it isn't EA), and so long as it isn't a Xbox One awful console exclusive
On top of that, these 2 games will be more controversial, deal with mental disorders, nationalistic disillusionment, power, and the unique point-of-view that is Big Boss' eye (literally). It will be an incredible experience I'm sure, and I can't wait to see what Kojima does to close out Big Boss' saga of Metal Gear, and connect it with Snake's story (perhaps we'll get a prequel to the original Metal Gear, or even a remake of Metal Gear 1 and 2=???).I was really hoping that Kojima wouldn't revisit the Big Boss mythos with these new games. I was hoping for a story based around the aftermath of the collapse of the war economy post-MGS4 (as cool as Revengeance was, I felt it was probably one of the weakest Metal Gear games due to its "standalone" narrative). All the same, I'm still really excited for the new MGS games. It's definitely one of my most beloved video game franchises. Very few games can match its presentation and format, I feel, and the story (looking past what I deem to be some of the whackest **** I have ever seen in plots and climaxes and conflict and tropes) is top notch. What really interests me is that Kojima is taking a different approach to the storytelling this time around; basically, he said that he's cutting back on the cutscenes and "putting the player back into the game." I'm interested to see how far he takes this new philosophy.
Seriously, Deathstroke is awesome. I love that guy. And yeah, let's hope each boss fight is hard, memorable, and really brings a MGS3 boss fight-esk challenge, sense of environment, and uniqueness to the game, while still maintaining that "Batman" feel and that feel that made Arkham Asylum and City so great.Also, Arkham Origins looks pretty effing sweet. ****ing Deathstroke better be as badass as he was in the comics, man. That inevitable boss fight needs to be hard.
Same they've always interested me. I've only watched Let's Plays of them. I'm just a bit turned off by the extremely long cut-scenesI don't think I've played any, but the MGS V trailer looked absolutely amazing and makes me a bit curious as to what the story is like.