Actually, they read into it wrong. Sakurai said just this.A mod needs to get this and spread it on
http://mynintendonews.com/2012/08/2...and-nintendo-3ds-will-have-lots-of-new-moves/
Apparently existing characters are getting a lot of new moves!
Just expect what Brawl did. No major change to old characters.“It’s fun making new skills for new characters.”
I know what you mean. More people are cutting Sheik for Impa. Of course, this seems retained to GameFAQs and is far from the majority. Thinking about it, it's just like Brawl. People though some characters were to be replaced with others because of relevancy. We still thought Ness was cut, and we had go reason to believe so (some what).Unfortunately, Diddy Kong is not alone in this thinking. It seems as the Impa infection has spread as time went on as I see more and more rosters replace Sheik with Impa.
I will bet my copy of SSB4 and $100 that Sheik stays and Impa is left out. There is no reason why Sheik should be cut for Impa when we have a much better potential Zelda rep in Ghirahim.
People want to know why I so virulently oppose any cuts on Nintendo vets and abysmal suggestions like cutting Sheik for Impa are reasons why.
Impa is one of the worst suggestions that gets semi-regular mentions. Even if she was a standalone character and Sheik stayed, I still would be against her inclusion.
I think the fact that we have to replace Sheik to put Impa in and have her as a tumor on Zelda shows how weak the character is. If Impa was a strong choice and people liked her, we would suggest Impa over Ghirahim. The truth is that Ghirahim stays the Zelda favorite while Impa supporters tend to try and make her important and put her with Zelda (basically taking an unimportant and uninteresting character and having leech on an important character). I think you comments on Impa show that not a lot of people are for her.