Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This.People lost hope for the Wario Bros in the NSMB games after the Toads were picked in NSMB Wii.
Personally, the Wario Bros should have been the protagonists of New Super Mario Bros. Jew. You know, the one about collecting coins.Don't know, maybe if the Waa duo and the Mario Bros. were going after a similar goal, like some sort of super awesome treasure or something.
Kind of a missed opportunity to do something like that for New Super Mario Bros. 2
The slogan would of been "GET READY FOR SOME REAL GREED!".Personally, the Wario Bros should have been the protagonists of New Super Mario Bros. Jew. You know, the one about collecting coins.
But the Big N wants it to be a 4P game.Like I said, Nabbit would have been better without having the two Toad recolors come along for the ride.
A perfect comparison for Luigi and Nabbit would have been Sonic and Tails.
No, the mistake was adding generic Toads to begin with. I like the fact that at least Nabbit is different from the rest, even if he's casual mode the character.It was rather stupid then to make Nabbit a character if they desperately wanted to do a 4-Player game.
What makes it work for the Mario version is that Luigi and the Toads work the same as Mario.
With this, they have three characters working like each other (unless the Toads are not jumping and sliding like Luigi in this) and one invulnerable character that can't get power-ups.
They would have been better off adding another Toad in that case, like THE Toad (Kiniopio) wearing his red vest from Sunshine so that he can take Mario's place as the "red" character.
Characters with different abilities from the Bros.Well, who else were they going to use? Unless you mean non-generic Toads such as Toad (lol non-generic yet still generic) and Toadette.
There is no other suitable alternative.
I haven't played Return to Dream Land, but NSMB is casual as it gets, multiplayer actually makes it more challenging, a SMB2 approach to it, with characters having different abilities would be a better idea to at least make it more interesting. It's certainly better than:When it comes to things like NSMB, having characters that work the same is ideal. This is because in those games, all players share the responsibility, and screw-ups cost everyone dearly.
In cases like Kirby's Return to Dream Land, Player 1 is really the only one that matters, so it doesn't really matter if the other players screw-up, and thus, they can be different.
EDIT: And Peach as a playable character wouldn't make any sense either. If she's with the players, there's no reason to go off to rescue her from Bowser, now is there?
Yeah, because we have to rehash the SAME boring plot point every time because story doesn't matter, right?EDIT: And Peach as a playable character wouldn't make any sense either. If she's with the players, there's no reason to go off to rescue her from Bowser, now is there?
Why not Imajin from Doki Doki Panic? That would have been great and would have brought in a retro character who would move just like Mario. I'm sure they could have worked an additional special quirk/gimmick for him to distance him a bit from Mario.If Nintendo was a bit creative they would have gone the SMB2 route and made Peach playable again.
SMB2 style Peach could have been a cool bonus for 100% completion. She's the damsel in distress and playing as her would have been a cool incentive for many casuals to attempt full completion. Like, they're just running around having fun now that she's saved.EDIT: And Peach as a playable character wouldn't make any sense either. If she's with the players, there's no reason to go off to rescue her from Bowser, now is there?
Yeah, but I heard the experience is not as fluid as in the SNES games because the controls aren't as responsive. I remember playing co-op with my brother a long time ago on that game and not liking it too much.Motion controls didn't ruin the game. The only way the motion controls are going to screw you over is if you're on a sugar high and cannot stand still for a second.
Something already being a nightmare doesn't justify suggesting something to make it worse.NSMB is already a nightmare in Multiplayer. Also have varied characters and also allow character the same character with a recolor, problem solved. Smash does that already and it's how Luigi was born.
We're basically saying the same ****, but from different points. The idea is that it needs change.Something already being a nightmare doesn't justify suggesting something to make it worse.
Also, check the edit to the last post. I responded to your clichéd plot rant.
Smash Bros and Mario Kart?NSMB has some of the best multiplayer around.