Super Smash Bros 4 (Wii U/3DS) Topic

[Pazzo.]

New pic of the day most likely.

Huh? All I see is two characters dodging the YD... that doesn't scream STAGE HAZARD!!

 

[Wario Bros.]

http://kotaku.com/the-game-creators...m_source=Kotaku_Twitter&utm_medium=Socialflow

Sakurai is one of the oldest members on the project and says he won't make games forever.

 

[PsychoIncarnate]

Actually, a lot of them do. Not even joking. Go look around. XD

And no, Viridi isn't funny or adorable. Just obnoxious and annoying.

Meanwhile, Palutena is totally passive-aggressive and manipulative. They both have issues.

Palutena just happens to be nicer and better looking, so she wins. ¦D

Passive-aggressive is much worse, so is manipulation.

At least Viridi is truthful to herself and others

 

[Moon Monkey]

http://kotaku.com/the-game-creators...m_source=Kotaku_Twitter&utm_medium=Socialflow

Sakurai is one of the oldest members on the project and says he won't make games forever.

And with his health condition, I wouldn't be surprised if he bows out soon.

I wounder who will take up the reigns when Sakurai isn't there. I just hope he/she is fair to both the 'casual' and' competitive' side, instead of skewing a bit to the 'casual' crowd.

 

[mimgrim]

Huh? All I see is two characters dodging the YD... that doesn't scream STAGE HAZARD!!

I dunno. No different then all the other jumps to conclusions people have made regarding Smash 4.

 

[Swamp Sensei]

If I remember correctly...

Isn't Prince Komic a guy?

 

[Berserker.]

If I remember correctly...

Isn't Prince Komic a guy?

Yep

Got nothing against him or what he's doing.

 

[Vintage Creep]

The first Smash game not from Sakurai will be interesting.

 

[Moon Monkey]

Even if Y. Devil is a stage hazard do you guys think Sakurai would implement the ability to toggle stage hazards this time around?

 

[Curious Villager]

Even if Y. Devil is a stage hazard do you guys think Sakurai would implement the ability to toggle stage hazards this time around?

I believe Sakurai commented on that at some point... I just can't exactly remember what he said again. But I think he said that he didn't want that option... I could be wrong though... :/

 

[Vintage Creep]

Even if Y. Devil is a stage hazard do you guys think Sakurai would implement the ability to toggle stage hazards this time around?

Nope he said he wouldn't. But I guess that if a lot of requests are made, a patch could be done about it.
Anyway, if the Devil really is a stage hazard, he's going to be the most annoying ever.

 

[Wario Bros.]

Even if Y. Devil is a stage hazard do you guys think Sakurai would implement the ability to toggle stage hazards this time around?

He said awhile back if he did had the idea "it might as well be PlayStation All-Stars". Of course Sakurai has changed his mind on stuff before.

 

[KingofPhantoms]

After skimming this page of this thread, I've come to an intelligent opinion: You people are ****ing wack as hell. I can't even grasp whatever it is you're talking about. Ydevil? Pornography? Viridi? Dafuq is going on?

/ydevil being a stage hazard sucks.

You think this is bad?

Heed my words: Never, EVER visit the Roster Prediction Discussion thread, if you think THIS is wack.

 

[Moon Monkey]

Bummer, thats kind of disappointing, but i'll live.

The first Smash game not from Sakurai will be interesting.

For real. Who knows, maybe Namco might handle future Smash games, Smash 4 could be a learning experience for them.

Speaking of 3rd Party compaines handeling Nintendo's IP, i wish SEGA would get the OK to make another F-zero

 

[KingofPhantoms]

If this game turns out as well as I hope to be, then I'd love it if Namco took over development for later Smash games, that is, when Sakurai finally decides to quit developing games. Personally I still hope he stays with the franchise for just one more game if he decides to keep Smash going at all. But I don't want him to be too hard on himself either.

 

[Starphoenix]

Bandanna Dee's back, haters.

 

[Baskerville]

Bandanna Dee's back, haters.

. . . . . . . .
Sorry, I thought I heard Chandelure squeeing.

 

[Chandeelure]

. . . . . . . .
Sorry, I thought I heard Chandelure squeeing.

Bandana Dee is back haters!

 

[KingofPhantoms]

Bandanna Dee's back, haters.

Heck yeah!

"looks at the list of users viewing this thread"

Oh hi there, Chandelure.

 

[Arcadenik]

But the important question is... is Waddle Dee playable in Kirby 3DS?

 

[BluePikmin11]

But the important question is... is Waddle Dee playable in Kirby 3DS?

Meh I don't think that will benefit Waddle Dee anyways.

 

[Chandeelure]

Meh I don't think that will benefit Waddle Dee anyways.

I'm a ninja!
You edited your post!
And you said that you don't think Bandana Dee will be playable in Smash!

 

[BluePikmin11]

I'm a ninja!
You edited your post!
And you said that you don't think Bandana Dee will be playable in Smash!

I better..

 

[Typhl0si0n]

I'm so amped for that New Kirby game. But who I really want to see playable...

 

[KingofPhantoms]

Playable Magolor would be pretty cool actually.

I'd only accept him if he's the 5th playable character though.

 

[Yomi's Biggest Fan]

http://kotaku.com/the-game-creators...m_source=Kotaku_Twitter&utm_medium=Socialflow

Sakurai is one of the oldest members on the project and says he won't make games forever.

I knew it all along. He needs to rest since he's been suffering enough pain and stress. Namco for new Smash 5 developer!.

 

[Jaedrik]

I just got back from doing my Private Voice I final. Here, I sing Panis Angelicus in F major: http://vocaroo.com/i/s1pA0G5B5ts5 one or two rhythm mistakes, being tense in the throat, shaky start ups, but otherwise yay! Also forgive the static, was too lazy to splice my voice together with the piano, so just played it through the speakers and put the mic next to it while I stood high above.

I just felt like you were faulting, Komic for being a fan of this chick, because of her unintended actions.
All I was saying is that it is all fair game, if its on the internet.

I wouldn't call what happened to her pornography or reason to recoil from it.

Oh, excuse me, I didn't mean to say that Prince Komic's avatar was pornographic in nature, nor did I mean to say that Ms. Verona was committing the pornographic act, I was merely using his avatar as an analogous springboard from lust to the condemnation of the more specific act of lust, pornography.
I was meaning to suggest that out of respect for the basic dignity of Ms. Verona and her wishes that Prince Komic should change his avatar.

I'm Christian myself, I can understand where you are coming from with the whole morality angle.
But sometimes, I like to take myself out of that label and look at the issues if I wasn't.

To state my point again: Once something is on the internet its fair game (unless you have copyright ownership), the streets internet is ruthless homie.

Again, I can still apply this to professional sports athletes. Hell most professions really.

Example A: Football (American) athletes in particular are prone to suffer from physical trauma to the body and brain.

I can agree with that, but take it beyond mankind. What about the Cheetah that kills the 17 months old Zebra running with the herd for the first time? What about the male black widow spider that has to give up his life so that his mate can use his body for nourishment for their children? Life is cruel all over (But at the same time it can be a good place too. Don't want to sound too pessimistic LOL)

We are, as you have illustrated with restating your point, framing the issue in different manners. However, that is an argument from analogy, one I must reject on the fundamental differences between sport and porn, and I hope you will, as being a Christian and man of reason, reject it yourself.

Sport is not morally destructive in the act itself, nor is being hurt a fundamental tenant of sport, though it may occur as collateral. The act in itself is not sinful (criminal against the creator), lust and all its antecedents, however, is.
Lust, as the Catechism says, is "disordered desire for or inordinate enjoyment of sexual pleasure", being an affront to the Natural Law, and an offense against the virtue of chastity and thence Divine Law. So too, pornography is characterized similarly: "Pornography consists of removing real or simulated sexual acts from the intimacy of the partners, in order to display them deliberately to third parties." Hurting oneself through sport is not the intention nor the specific act, in fact, sport in itself is a glorification of God and our competitive spirits; Sex, too, is a glorification of God, lust and pornography are deliberate and disordered perversions of such and thus offenses against the Law. I imagine if sport is somehow perverted, such as the disordered desire for or inordinate enjoyment of winning, it too would be an offense. Such is not often the case, and even if it did I wouldn't know what to call it.

I am, for the most part, leaving out the consequences. But suffice it to say that I hate utilitarian philosophy and reject the notion that all pain is solely evil, I mean, if it was only evil, then why do good people get hurt?

Animals, or other animals I should say, do not have the rational capacity that we have, thus they are not bound by the same moral law, it would not be just to judge those without the ability to know the crime and sin.
We reflect this in our contract law (United States), if it can be demonstrated that one party did not or does not have the capacity to understand the crime they had committed in not giving the consideration or doing the deed that they were obligated to do by a contract, they are free from having to fulfill their obligation, but so too the other party receives their consideration back (if it can be) in return.

I'm so amped for that New Kirby game. But who I really want to see playable...

Yo

Spoiler

Foxtrot that jerk!

 

[Starphoenix]

But the important question is... is Waddle Dee playable in Kirby 3DS?

Not sure. The fact that there is a Mii icon next to him leads me to believe Streetpass may be involved somehow. Co-op would be great, though.

 

[Pazzo.]

If I remember correctly...

Isn't Prince Komic a guy?

New Popple Avatar? That guy always reminded me of Humphrey Beauregard, see?

 

[Ridley_Prime]

After skimming this page of this thread, I've come to an intelligent opinion: You people are ****ing wack as hell. I can't even grasp whatever it is you're talking about. Ydevil? Pornography? Viridi? Dafuq is going on?

Never change Typhlosion.

And with his health condition, I wouldn't be surprised if he bows out soon.

I wounder who will take up the reigns when Sakurai isn't there. I just hope he/she is fair to both the 'casual' and' competitive' side, instead of skewing a bit to the 'casual' crowd.

Smashchu would prolly hate whoever Sakurai's successor is then if he/she is more fair to both sides , but I agree.

Nope he said he wouldn't. But I guess that if a lot of requests are made, a patch could be done about it.
Anyway, if the Devil really is a stage hazard, he's going to be the most annoying ever.

Probably not as annoying if Ridley becomes a hazard and most of his fans make it their job to lure opponents into his grip when playing on Pyrosphere.

 

[Moon Monkey]

I just got back from doing my Private Voice I final. Here, I sing Panis Angelicus in F major: http://vocaroo.com/i/s1pA0G5B5ts5 one or two rhythm mistakes, being tense in the throat, shaky start ups, but otherwise yay! Also forgive the static, was too lazy to splice my voice together with the piano, so just played it through the speakers and put the mic next to it while I stood high above.

Oh, excuse me, I didn't mean to say that Prince Komic's avatar was pornographic in nature, nor did I mean to say that Ms. Verona was committing the pornographic act, I was merely using his avatar as an analogous springboard from lust to the condemnation of the more specific act of lust, pornography.
I was meaning to suggest that out of respect for the basic dignity of Ms. Verona and her wishes that Prince Komic should change his avatar.
We are, as you have illustrated with restating your point, framing the issue in different manners. However, that is an argument from analogy, one I must reject on the fundamental differences between sport and porn, and I hope you will, as being a Christian and man of reason, reject it yourself.

Sport is not morally destructive in the act itself, nor is being hurt a fundamental tenant of sport, though it may occur as collateral. The act in itself is not sinful (criminal against the creator), lust and all its antecedents, however, is.
Lust, as the Catechism says, is "disordered desire for or inordinate enjoyment of sexual pleasure", being an affront to the Natural Law, and an offense against the virtue of chastity and thence Divine Law. So too, pornography is characterized similarly: "Pornography consists of removing real or simulated sexual acts from the intimacy of the partners, in order to display them deliberately to third parties." Hurting oneself through sport is not the intention nor the specific act, in fact, sport in itself is a glorification of God and our competitive spirits; Sex, too, is a glorification of God, lust and pornography are deliberate and disordered perversions of such and thus offenses against the Law. I imagine if sport is somehow perverted, such as the disordered desire for or inordinate enjoyment of winning, it too would be an offense. Such is not often the case, and even if it did I wouldn't know what to call it.

I am, for the most part, leaving out the consequences. But suffice it to say that I hate utilitarian philosophy and reject the notion that all pain is solely evil, I mean, if it was only evil, then why do good people get hurt?

Animals, or other animals I should say, do not have the rational capacity that we have, thus they are not bound by the same moral law, it would not be just to judge those without the ability to know the crime and sin.
We reflect this in our contract law (United States), if it can be demonstrated that one party did not or does not have the capacity to understand the crime they had committed in not giving the consideration or doing the deed that they were obligated to do by a contract, they are free from having to fulfill their obligation, but so too the other party receives their consideration back (if it can be) in return.

First off, I'll say: Best of luck to you on your vocal finals.

Spoiler

Second, I understand where your coming from. The having respect for another's dignity part, I can understand. At this point all you can do is ask.
Also, I don't really consider it an act of lust. What about models? Yeah, i'm sure there are those that lust after super models in the way you are referring to, but you can admire someones looks with being a creeper.

Like I said before, when looking at issues such as this I like to look at it from all angles not just strictly a religious view point. Of course, if i look at it through those goggles, my answer is for the most part, will be the same as yours. But, what happens when you take divine law out of the equation for a second? Things can be quite different.

While pornography would still be a to some extent (Depending on where you live) morally destructive. It is now seen just as any other job. I know in the US for example porn is just another job, granted it is looked down upon by quite a few people.

Lastly, I've seen a LOT of animal documentaries of various animals, and while I agree animals don't rationalize things to the same extent humans do, that doesn't mean to say they don't at all.

 

[Smooth Criminal]

Sorry, Monk, I can't back up your big brain when you lockstep into the divine.

Smooth Criminal

 

[Fatmanonice]

After skimming this page of this thread, I've come to an intelligent opinion: You people are ****ing wack as hell.

"Whiggity wack?" "Nah, just the regular kind."

 

[Salty the SLUG]

Hey everyone! I'm back!

 

[mimgrim]

Hey everyone! I'm back!

Who are you and why should I care?

 

[Salty the SLUG]

Who are you and why should I care?

Kind of harsh, don't you think? I've been away for the last four or so months. I was once a frequent visitor to this social thread.

 

[mimgrim]

Kind of harsh, don't you think? I've been away for the last four or so months. I was once a frequent visitor to this social thread.

That doesn't explain who you are and why I should care.

If you explained both you may get a pleasant surprise.

 

[Moon Monkey]

Hey everyone! I'm back!

How's it going bruh? Finally able to breath now that the winter break is rolling around!?

 

[Salty the SLUG]

That doesn't explain who you are and why I should care.

If you explained both you may get a pleasant surprise.

Look, by acting that way I have no choice but to give you vague answers. I had just explained it to you that I was away for four months and now I'm back to socialize with everyone and talk about the Smash series and where it's going once more. I don't care if you do or not., frankly, if you hadn't approached me like that you may have gotten a different answer.

 

[Salty the SLUG]

How's it going bruh? Finally able to breath now that the winter break is rolling around!?

That is correct, broseph!

I originally left when Smashboards was having issues staying online back in September. I was going to leave for a short time anyway, but the fact that I could not access the site confirmed my answer for me. Today I decided to check up on the site and BOOM, I'm back.