Sabrar
Smash Ace
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2020
- Messages
- 931
No.
You can search the thread by author (click on top right search icon, select 'This thread' instead of 'Everywhere' and enter player name into 'By' field).
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
No.
Come up with yeeting someone with such terrible reasoning.Not what buddy
Um, any confirmable false claim will fall apart eventually when the claimed power doesn' t work?what do you mean by this?
looking at the claims right now, do you see any that can fit this?Um, any confirmable false claim will fall apart eventually when the claimed power doesn' t work?
jfc this took me all day to findI reset the vote, but only early in a day phase
From my idea of it it would be to help safeguard in case a judgement day seems upcoming? Risky obviously but sanctioning a demon would remove them from the pool, so it would prevent a judgement day just like banishing one would. Additionally, even if we fail to hit a demon, we would at least get a scummy townie that may be likely to have been banished during a judgement day and caused us to lose the game. I guess it would depend on how much faith we had in the sanctioned spirits in the case of a judgement day. Not entirely sure that I would push for the strategy, but i'm pretty sure that's the logic behind it if me and sabrar were thinking similar things. Good to at least keep in mind igSomeone ELI5 re: the Demon sanction?
I'm a little confused why people are still focusing so much on claims and fake claims? Fake claiming seems like it would be more work than it's work given the seemingly harmless nature of these roles. Genuinely curious what you're worried about. What would scum stand to gain by fake claiming considering the type of roles we've seen so far?looking at the claims right now, do you see any that can fit this?
i mean we cant rule out scums working together to support a fake claim
are you saying the slot generally hasnt made any impression on you this phase? or is this in response to something specific?Huh, Sabrar actually left no impression in my mind, that is weird.
ok this makes more sense even though you've essentially reduced it to a truism. obviously if the scum fakeclaim something that should be confirmable, but that they don't actually have, then eventually with savvy town direction that lie should be exposed rather quickly when the claim fails to produce the advertised results. thatd be some pretty bad scum play though that I doubt anyone on this roster would commit to as a strategy (unless Fate has seen some wild **** from his homesite)Um, any confirmable false claim will fall apart eventually when the claimed power doesn' t work?
I am in principle against unprovoked D1 claims. More so power claims, because I feel that mass claiming on D1 is against the spirit of the game. If I had an easily searchable archive of old games, I could probably find at least a half a dozen references where I have discussed this previously. [Note to self: Meta Mafia II almost ready to post finish it up.] And I say this as someone who is a very mechanical player that enjoys late game power role strategizing. But I also enjoy the unknowns of early game (and add the usual stuff about protecting town PRs, anti-claim mechanics, etc).While I am not surprised by this in the slightest, I am actually curious in the context of this particular setup why you still feel this way.
This question was for somitomi. Why didn’t you let him answer it?In theory, they could. In practice, this does not look like it would be a particularly productive exercise. Of the seven players who have claimed, six have claimed roles that are publicly confirmable, in thread, within the same phase (everyone except Somi and possibly Swiss depending on how late in the day he can use his power). So if there are any role-related shenanigans, the number of players who could actually cause any problems is pretty small at this point.
Maven’s not a newbie. I played my first game with Maven on xkcd in 2017, and he had been playing on Smashboards before, though I don’t know for how long. And as I said, I think reading/comprehending/retaining the rules is NAI. But my opinion aside, it seems premature to me to label Maven town so early in the game and based on that one post, like perhaps you’re looking for a reason to do so?#107 Bessie re: maven. would maven as scum who's a new player not bother to read the rules?
#108 spidery, in this case, is when laser is reading off. Normally i save it for late game to describe the scum leader. But he's reading the same as last agme. Where he was scum. And I was town. And I was right. And Bessie THREW THE GAME.
Interesting, since you missed in your next post #120 that Swiss already claimed.yes, and im keeping track of what claim is confirmable and what isnt
I just wanna highlight this BECAUSE IT IS VERY IMPORTANT AND VERY TRUE!!!It's helping out Darkpit but helping new(ish) players is NAI.
well a day 1 claim would stop thisInteresting, what would stop scum from breadcrumbing a false claim? Or potential false claim(s) so they could point to it later?
I was not looking specifically for a reaction from Swiss, I was happy to get any reaction at all. I like Darkpit's thoughts on the matter, their approach is from a townie mindset.darkpit I'm pretty sure sabrar was trying to get a read on swiss based on his speculation re: sabrar's strategical reasoning and/or swiss's eventual response if and when sabrar chose to actually explain his position
I'm well aware of your position on claiming. That's why I said I wasn't surprised.I am in principle against unprovoked D1 claims. More so power claims, because I feel that mass claiming on D1 is against the spirit of the game. If I had an easily searchable archive of old games, I could probably find at least a half a dozen references where I have discussed this previously. [Note to self: Meta Mafia II almost ready to post finish it up.] And I say this as someone who is a very mechanical player that enjoys late game power role strategizing. But I also enjoy the unknowns of early game (and add the usual stuff about protecting town PRs, anti-claim mechanics, etc).
I don't really feel I have been insistent about it. I suggested the idea and explained why I thought it was a good one, and made one or two further points on it. The only player I specifically pressed for a claim was Swiss because I found it odd that he said he was interested in the idea at Day's start and then never claimed. Everyone else has claimed unprompted except for Sabrar.In the context of this particular setup, why are you so insistent that everyone claim so early in the game?
Honestly, it seemed like such a trivial point, given what we already knew, that I didn't really think it was important who answered.This question was for somitomi. Why didn’t you let him answer it?
I question the veracity of this reason for a mass-claim. The mod expressed multiple times that abilities would have low impact, but if you still thought that they could be useful then you also had to consider the possibility of scum being able to interfere with them, especially if they were made public.All of the eliminations are controlled by Town, so there isn't any danger of losing useful PRs, and we have the opportunity to direct PR actions as needed.
Not really, but I don't think scum would lie about their powers in this game (see reply to FF below), even if they somehow cooperated to "confirm" it (which isn't any less risky as a strategy). But claiming their actual powers also limits scum, since they now can't use it in an overtly anti-town way (and they might be asked to use it in some specific way or not use it at all). In either case we're back to the initial question: is knowing everyone's role useful enough for scum to compensate for this in a game where they can't directly kill the "strong" PRs?looking at the claims right now, do you see any that can fit this?
i mean we cant rule out scums working together to support a fake claim
I was under the impression that Fate was sussing LaserGuy for suggesting a mass claim and that made no logical sense to me. I just realised he called that NAI which is a reasonable position but I already got the ball rolling...I'm a little confused why people are still focusing so much on claims and fake claims? Fake claiming seems like it would be more work than it's work given the seemingly harmless nature of these roles. Genuinely curious what you're worried about. What would scum stand to gain by fake claiming considering the type of roles we've seen so far?
It's the former, but the thought occured to me while reading Laser discussing his Sabrar scumread with someone.are you saying the slot generally hasnt made any impression on you this phase? or is this in response to something specific?
I wasn't, in fact in my initial post on the topic I basically ruled out scum claiming a made up power. The latter just didn't occur to me at the time, although the subsequent discussion convinced me that doing so would indeed be pretty dumb in this game.you originally said "any confirmable claim" not "any confirmable false claim" which was confusing because scum could have any of the given claimed powers and be lying about their alignment and it would still be a "false claim" but it seems like you were specifically referring to a scenario where scum invent a claim of a power they don't actually even have. generally speaking it is very possible for a scum fake claim to "check out" if they actually have the ability they claim to have and execute it as directed, I was concerned that you were ruling this possibility out
I think my reply would've been the same though, since it amounted to "I haven't thought of that before".Note: somitomi responded to my post in his #116, but did not respond to the question that LaserGuy answered for him. He answered a similar (but not the same) question asked by Sabrar.
Thank you for this, I was worried I messed up some master plot or somethingI was not looking specifically for a reaction from Swiss, I was happy to get any reaction at all. I like Darkpit's thoughts on the matter, their approach is from a townie mindset.
You can wait until after the game if you want, but can you explain to me how to distinguish between when someone genuinely wants speculation and when they're just trying to get a read?darkpit I'm pretty sure sabrar was trying to get a read on swiss based on his speculation re: sabrar's strategical reasoning and/or swiss's eventual response if and when sabrar chose to actually explain his position
not sure spoon feeding swiss possible answers is the protown move here =/
This is much more along the lines of what I was thinking, I'm really not that worried about scum's roles having too large of an impact, whether they're being truthful or not.Not really, but I don't think scum would lie about their powers in this game (see reply to FF below), even if they somehow cooperated to "confirm" it (which isn't any less risky as a strategy). But claiming their actual powers also limits scum, since they now can't use it in an overtly anti-town way (and they might be asked to use it in some specific way or not use it at all). In either case we're back to the initial question: is knowing everyone's role useful enough for scum to compensate for this in a game where they can't directly kill the "strong" PRs?
Assuming this is what Bessie meant?LaserGuy | 2/5 | Swiss, Sabrar
I think it's rather because of my charming personality.Assuming this is what Bessie meant?
The possibility of scum randing a role that happens to be able to interfere with one of Town's roles in a way that would be significantly more detrimental to us with everything known publicly is pretty small. It's not impossible, but more often than not the advantage to Town is going to far outweigh any advantage given to scum.I question the veracity of this reason for a mass-claim. The mod expressed multiple times that abilities would have low impact, but if you still thought that they could be useful then you also had to consider the possibility of scum being able to interfere with them, especially if they were made public.
Sabrar has gold text now? anyone claiming responsibility for this?Vote Count [B1-3a]
LaserGuy | 2/5 | Swiss, Sabrar
Swiss | 2/5 | FrozenFlame, FateShirou
Sabrar | 1/5 | LaserGuy
this post still reads grime af imo#153 FF I dont actually get what you dislike of me
just comes off forced an inauthentic, gut readWell I was gonna suggest massclaim also but since LaserGuy is being Waggoned for it I’ll keep quiet
##Laserguy
how serious was this? laser coming out the gate saying "sheeping sabrar" whether intended to be a joke RVS vote or not, was questionable to me##Unvote
##LaserGuy
I'm sorry you rolled scum again.
Now that it has been brought to your attention, what do you think of Sabrar?It's the former, but the thought occured to me while reading Laser discussing his Sabrar scumread with someone.
Are you referring to something like, my posts tend to come across as quite polished and carefully constructed whereas a less 'cautious' person would just say what's on their mind without really worrying about the phrasing? If so, I will accept that by this metric, my posting is 'cautious'.#127 I responded to this also...cautious to me doesn't mean strong reads, it means careful and analytical maybe moreso. easier to discuss outside of a game
You are tonally similar
Banish SwissIf you had to pick one player right now to banish and one player to sanction, who would you choose?
It was serious because 2+3=5.how serious was this? laser coming out the gate saying "sheeping sabrar" whether intended to be a joke RVS vote or not, was questionable to me
Please let me know what effect you expect when you give a cookie to a sanctioned player.Once during a phrase i can give a cookie to someone whos in limbo or sanctioned, and their votes will have an asterisk next to them, the player who i give the cookie to can accept or deny it
i have no idea, just paraphrasing what my role PM says, maybe someone isnt saying anything and a sanctioned player can vote?Please let me know what effect you expect when you give a cookie to a sanctioned player.
Discuss what you dislike of my play vs what is scummy and why.Banish Swiss
Sanction Laserguy/darkpit
No i have notSo you haven't asked the mod or tried to figure it out?
Dont like the way you claimed or ur roleDiscuss what you dislike of my play vs what is scummy and why.
I dont like how you slipped it lolHas it occurred to you to meta check any of this. Why not?
What is wrong about how I claimed and what is wrong about what I claimed
interesting 3 slots to pick here, especially considering you want to sanction 2/3 of my first shot at the team solveBanish Swiss
Sanction Laserguy/darkpit
No, i most certainly did not think they were connectedI want to understand your thought process here, do you have independent reasons for the locations for each of these proposals or are you picking these slots based on their relationships to one another? because if you feel laserguy and darkpit are aligned I share that suspicion but in that they're mates so walk me thru this
How does this follow from your post #98?well a day 1 claim would stop this
but on the other hand they could fake claim and spend the rest of the game proofing it
anyways bessie, have you got a vote list ?
It was background information needed so that others could understand the context of my answer to your question.I'm well aware of your position on claiming. That's why I said I wasn't surprised.
My question to somitomi was in #107. You answered it in #110, without giving somitomi an opportunity to respond to me. somitomi didn’t post until #116 where he answered similar, not identical, questions.Honestly, it seemed like such a trivial point, given what we already knew, that I didn't really think it was important who answered.
Regardless, he did answer the same question from both Fate and Sabrar in #116, but I'm sorry if you feel left out.
This doesn’t make any sense. Immediately above this, you say “I wasn't, in fact in my initial post on the topic I basically ruled out scum claiming a made up power.” So how can you say you ruled out scum false claiming a power in your initial post, but later that you didn’t think of it before?I think my reply would've been the same though, since it amounted to "I haven't thought of that before".
Sabrar has gold text now? anyone claiming responsibility for this?
Swiss claimed to reset the votes, not change them. Powers were randomized to alignments. You’re reaching for reasons here, aren’t you?I dont like how you slipped it lol
and i have PTSD about a vote changing claim like yours, last time i encoutered one they were scum, is this enough NO
this phrase is going to late forever ahaAnd I rarely vote that early in the game. I'm working on my reads list and will try to have it tonight or tomorrow.
was it you doggo
i mean technically if the votes reset, isnt that a change?Swiss claimed to reset the votes, not change them. Powers were randomized to alignments. You’re reaching for reasons here, aren’t you?
About to try to reread everything and evaluate everyone more analytically, then I will get both of these hopefully by the end of the night. Right now I'm just realll confused about where I stand on most of the people hereneed to hear more from you all re: actual stances on slots, we're halfway thru the phase and I really don't see many real reads. don't need a full readlist if you don't want to yet but need atleast some pitches from you all if im going to have any chance at reading your slots
Also could someone explain how Maven is obvtown? A few people have mentioned it and ig I'm just missing it but like,,, how?stop like being sorta obvtown