If the insurance wasn't there, people would still put their money in banks would still get away with crazy stuff. And don't give me the efficient market bogus. I'm consistently surprised by how many smart people say less regulation = better. In a perfectly efficient market, that is indeed true. However, the market is far, far, far from being that efficient (fortunately, as technology increases and people have more ways to become connected with each other, we're toward being more efficient). Consumer protection regulation is necessary for the well-being of society. There are plenty of instances where it does more good than harm.
This simply isn't the case. If insurance wasn't there people would shop around and look for banks that are in line with their personal risk preferences. I mean, we see this exact effect happen already with things like hedge funds/mutual funds/ETFs already.
Consumer protection regulation is particularly unnecessary because the market can fulfill that function. I know that when I want to buy something, I often go read reviews online. I'm so glad the government makes people do these reviews ... oh wait.
That's just an example to demonstrate the principle.
I loled at "I'm consistently surprised by how many smart people say less regulation = better". I can just say I'm surprised people can say more regulation is better. Do you disagree that less regulation is better in 99% of cases? Sure, we can have a grand debate about the other 1%, but from your generalized statement above it seems you don't even believe the principle in general (first welfare theorem).
Which makes all the difference in the world.
Not necessarily at all. Look at the financial crisis. If the government hadn't intervened, we would've had an absolute catastrophe. Why? Because
I'd sure like to have your powers of sight into alternate futures. Plenty of people disagree with this.
Anyway, it's important to note that government regulations/interventions and poor monetary policy has a large part in causing the financial crisis.
It's a pretty huge deal on 2+2, and PStars has confirmed that they do not. Of course, it might only be a huge deal because everyone has been worried about getting paid since Black Friday.
Obviously it matters tremendously now. But if Full Tilt had revealed this before the DOJ shutdown, would you have pulled your money out? Would everyone else have pulled their money out?