Man.
I just remembered last night (maybe first time I knew even, but I feel like I’ve read it before on this site probably), that the Zelda Encyclopedia said Termina isn’t real, just a fabrication brought to life temporarily. (I saw someone brought up that it wasn’t real on Twitter)
I mean, based on what the Encyclopedia said, at least Skull Kid is still a big focus but...why not just say it’s a parallel world and leave it at that, like what was said originally? Instead of a parallel world yet also a fabrication that ceases to exist when Link leaves? Skull Kid would still have that amount of grief Link needs to save him from. This also seems to contradict some ingame lore and events...
Though, based on stuff I’ve read from people in wiki talk pages and whatever, this may not be fully reliable; rather, an interpretation from the writers, just approved by Nintendo (and it contradicts Hyrule Historia too apparently), so whatever I guess.
I still assume the characters (or at least Tatl, Tael, and maybe the giants alongside Skull Kid, Happy Mask Salesman, Majora and the Fierce Deity of course) are real anyway even if the “Majora used Skull Kid’s memories and burdened heart to make Termina” version of events is true, as maybe it’s all based on stuff Skull Kid went through at least...though, that does make Tatl’s story seem retconned, and she and Tael follow Skull Kid outside of Termina too, including before he got the mask, so it’s all weird and doesn’t appear to make any sense unless they wanna say “well uh Tatl isn’t reliable because of what we said and we’re just gonna ignore the fact what we said doesn’t make any sense considering she and her brother can exist outside Termina and were there before Skull Kid could supposedly create them with the mask and nothing points to what she said being fake.”
And Skull Kid drew himself, the fairies, the giants, and Link all together on the tree stump at the end...so, they had to at least be real at some point, right?
Or maybe Termina is real, but it wasn’t in the state it was in when Link came nor maybe even called “Termina” previous to Majora latching onto Skull Kid?
Plus the “it’s not real” take would feel it was done poorly, too. While the “5 stages of grief” theory people thought of appears to make sense, literally nothing indicates it’s a fabricated world, just the beginning making it clear it’s indeed an alternate world with Skull Kid + Majora’s Mask having strange powers. Link’s Awakening and Mother do the “they’re not real worlds/they’re in your or another person’s head but brought to life” thing better since they’re actually heavily implied or flat-out said at points in the game (with Mother’s seemingly fabricated world not being the main world either).
Also, what about Tingle? This is his first game, and he appears in more afterwards! Is he from a memory of Skull Kid’s, part of a real world, or just not real in this timeline?!
My brain hurts. I guess videogames are made for people to enjoy, though, so whatever, screw new supposed canon that may not even be fully considered canon aside from the timeline placements, I’m sticking with old canon, as much as I do still like that Skull Kid is a big focus if not an even bigger focus in the newer “canon”...
Maybe I should just ask Nintendo, but the person running their email probably wouldn’t know...