Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
No joke or sarcasm here, the Gregory Horror Show is an anime that disproves the argument
Because literally all of them are shounen anime. It's like watching only superhero movies and saying all live action movies are the same.
Those animes looke Mother****ing.NOTHING alike.
Aside from the standard "puppet mouth" used in anime, the animation styles are all somewhat different. SAO is A-1 pictures, which specializes in fluid animation and bright colors. DBZ was produced by Toei, which is known for producing "retro" anime that have a classic animation style to it. MHA is produced by Studio Bones, which specializes bright colors and character designs that "pop". The problem here is that you're assuming that all animation in anime is exactly the same when the differences in animation are noticable.
osby
said. Potentially the best anime of all time; Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood is basically a mixture of steampunk action and also drama. Clannad is one of the most well-known romance anime out there, and it's second half is notably well-received to the point where the first half is over-shadowed, even if part 1 is decent too. There are other genres like sitcom (Lucky Star) or horror/thriller (Higurashi), but the bottom line is that you should probably open up your mind more and not generalize so much. It's inaccurate.And as I showcased, the artstyle of many anime productions can get as creative and different from the stuff most people know as a western animated production. Yet again, as the Gregory Horror Show is an example of.
I don’t know. I still think they all look alike.Aside from the standard "puppet mouth" used in anime, the animation styles are all somewhat different. SAO is A-1 pictures, which specializes in fluid animation and bright colors. DBZ was produced by Toei, which is known for producing "retro" anime that have a classic animation style to it. MHA is produced by Studio Bones, which specializes bright colors and character designs that "pop". The problem here is that you're assuming that all animation in anime is exactly the same when the differences in animation are noticable.
And out of those, you listed many shonen (action) shows. All of them are action shows, actually. Within your list, the trope list per show has a few similarities, but there are differences that you should probably give some credit to. For example: Attack on Titan is VERY gritty and is popular among adults due to the in-depth, complex story that is present within the show. On the other hand, shows like DBZ and MHA are aimed at younger teens with far more comedic and/or straightforward storylines. Not to mention that there are plenty of other genres in anime, as
We remeber and it makes little to no point in your nonsensical argument
Kirby put on pants before you go to the gym jesus chrust
It's a new copy ability: Bodybuilder Kirby, along with Training Coach Meta-Knight.
It’s not related to the argument at all. I just wanted to remember it cause it’s weird. And maybe steer the conversation away from the point of contention
What can I even do when you use the argument of "I don't know"? It's a dead end and leads literally nowhere.
I mean. I don’t really watch the stuff. I’ve tried out episodes here and there of the things I hear get praise. But I always stop watching because of similar problems. The ones I shared above.
I always thought I wouldn't have a good reason for pouring shampoo in my eyes
Not only is that not true, it does a disservice to studios like Bones that have some of the most fluid animation in all of the industry
I guess no matter who he copies, Kirby will never have genitals.
Peoples then wonder why we haven't met higher lifeform yet.
I really need to watch Soul Eater again
Oh god, well that's just delightful... ;p
Shish no. Edelgard isn't worth it.
What would be a good idea is trying out at least one full season of each show before you jump to conclusions. And the greatest part of each show is the story being told, not the animation style. The animation style is just icing on the cake, but the story and characters is the cake itself.
I love it, but I just can't get behind that ending.
If she isn't worth it then no one is
and Im gonna Shill Yuri on Ice as well
OOOOOOH yeah, the ending of the anime is one of the only things I dislike about the show.
Coincidentally, I’m not a huge fan of icing either. You gotta have a thin as **** later of it or else it overwhelms the cake with nothing but pure horrid sugar. I feel there’s a kind of metaphor there.
Not sure what you're implying. Are you saying too much animation is a bad thing? Can you give examples of what you're saying too? It'd make things easier for everybody here.
I actually forgot what the ending was lol
Those hips were blessed by the goddess herself FOR GENERATIONS..
