+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Right now, nothing is confirmed in terms of tiers and tier names; you're free to see them as what you like.For my final two votes though, I need some claification: Are the tiers right now Top Tier - High Tier - Mid Tier 1 - Mid Tier 2 - Low Tier - Bottom Tier, or Top Tier - High Tier - Upper Mid Tier - Mid Tier - Low Mid Tier - Low Tier?
the misinformation here is delicious-1 Wait, when did this happen? "Tons of people play him!" And only a few people do well with him, which shows that he isn't a solid high tier at the moment. As weird as it may sound, high representation with few results proves that it's most likely the specific players being really good at the game instead of the character.
-1 Sorry if you agree with ZeRo, but she is not interchangeable with Marth. If she were, then we would see an equal amount of Marth and Lucina at top level, and that's simply not the case.
the misinformation here is delicious
You're right. It is.-1 Like R.O.B., annoying but not good.
Alright then, I'll edit in my remaining votes. I agree we need another tier (I think 2 may be good)Right now, nothing is confirmed in terms of tiers and tier names; you're free to see them as what you like.
Though if you really want some help on deciding, just go for the 2nd option you said because I feel we need another tier somewhere, be it near the top, or the bottom.
The reason they are split is because it became quite common for people to split them up nowadays. I agree that it could be annoying to have to vote twice to move them up, so I might make a new rule, which would be as follows...Bowserboy3 I have a suggestion for a rule change regarding the Pits. What if they always remain at the same tier, but can end up at different parts in the tier? So, for instance, Pit might be #1 in high-mid tier and Dark Pit #4. Having to spend two votes to move the Pits is kind of annoying, and I think most will try to keep them within the same tier anyway.
*cough* ANTi exists *cough* Comparing Mario to Falcon is probably not a good comparison. And if he's truly in that tier, he's probably toward the bottom of it.the misinformation here is delicious
Before you pull the "Fatality is carrying Falcon at majors" excuse, I guess we can say Mario isn't that good either since Ally is the only Mario getitng into top 16s at majors.
ANTi has a ton of secondaries/pockets though. Ally is almost always pure Mario.*cough* ANTi exists *cough* Comparing Mario to Falcon is probably not a good comparison. And if he's truly in that tier, he's probably toward the bottom of it.
Time to make use of the fancy new rule
+1 [ + ]
ANTi got 2nd at TBH6 using Mario for most sets, only using ZSS for one matchup and losing with Cloud and Charizard. I'm pretty sure it's safe to say he proves Mario's worth, especially since he's beaten lots of top players including ZeRo with his Mario. It's entirely incorrect to assume that Ally is the "only Mario getting top 16 in majors anymore", because that's simply not the case.the misinformation here is delicious
Fatality continues to get excellent results with Falcon at top level, and other Falcons like Tearbear, Pichi and Gluttony continue to do well. Before you pull the "Fatality is carrying Falcon at majors" excuse, I guess we can say Mario isn't that good either since Ally is the only Mario getitng into top 16s at majors.
Lucina has been getting rep lately, Kogarasuma is a solo Lucina that is getting respectable results with her and Nairo used her to good success at Little Big House and even BH6.
Just because we don't think she is as effective in competitive play as the list displays does not mean we "hate" this fictional character.What's will all the Lucina hate?
Because even the character she is a clone of is too high. So naturally, she is too high. Plus most people think that Tippers make her tiers below Marth for some reasonWhat's will all the Lucina hate?
Since when was Ryo the only notable Corrin? Ryuga, Frozen, Yoc, and Cosmos are all very notable Corrins with more notable wins then Ryo. Personally I fealt Ryo could of made it to top 8 if he swapped to corrin when Aba pulled out Rosa. Also, I think Ryo went Ike for the sets he lost at CEO(don't quote me on that though) and getting 9th at such a hard tournament like SSC is amazing.+ Once again: better than ever single character in the tier below him, better than a few in his current tier. San did just as well at TBH recently as he's always done a majors: proof that Ike as a character has not dropped in relative power from before. On top of that, Ryo announced he was going to go back to pure Ike for a while. He's in the correct tier.
-I'll maintain my position of "Corrin is at the top of the tier below". If Ryo's results spike back up after he goes pure Ike again however, I'll consider it fairly solid proof that Corrin is even lower than that. (As far as I have seen, Ryo's results have suffered since picking up Corrin seriously.)
-
-
Holding onto the last vote again
I think you miscounted the Mii votes. Gunner is at +/- 0. One of the 2 votes was an upvote.Mii Gunner is currently at -2... In Low-mid tier. But Mii Gunner is actually pretty decent and probably shouldn't move down any further at all, so I suggest an up-vote or two to reduce the risk of them falling down (Mii Brawler should move down though).
Changing my Zard downvote to this:-1 Zard really just does not have the juice to be a mid tier. Little amount of notable results and his awful disadvantage state are always going to keep him from relevancy, along with a lack of reward compared to other heavies.
-1 Mid's a better place for him. He's annoying but not good.
-1 After Nasubi dropping him, I can safely say he's dropping slower to low tier as the meta progresses.
-1 Like R.O.B., annoying but not good.
+1 Too low for where she is rn.
-Many of the Pac-Man's moves are kinda underwhelming/undertuned. He kinda suffers from the same thing as Wario which is being centralized around a gimmick, in Pac-Man's case it is the Fruit, while rest of his moveset is bad (Wario doesn't have it as bad as Pac-Man tho).I see that people are still too focused on the numbers.
+ I'm pretty sure that everyone here who knows mii (höhöö good one Routa) knew that I would upvote Gunner. I have gave my reasoning before and I don't want to sound like a broken record. I can accept him being in the list he currently is if wii only look at results and relevance to the meta, but from the toolkit side and how he works as a character I have hard time not seeing him somewhere around characters like Link, Bowser and Samus.
+ It is really hard to explain why I voted there guys. It might have to do with chatting with a local Dark Pit main and looking more into his theory and data.
- What do you have when you completely remove characters strong advantage state and make his disadvantage state worse? Guest 1111 Brawler.
I'm not sure about the other votes so I will look into them later. Other than thous the tier list seems rather solid atm.
I counted 3 down-votes and 1 up-vote.I think you miscounted the Mii votes. Gunner is at +/- 0. One of the 2 votes was an upvote.
He's far from the only one, never claimed he was.Since when was Ryo the only notable Corrin? Ryuga, Frozen, Yoc, and Cosmos are all very notable Corrins with more notable wins then Ryo. Personally I fealt Ryo could of made it to top 8 if he swapped to corrin when Aba pulled out Rosa. Also, I think Ryo went Ike for the sets he lost at CEO(don't quote me on that though) and getting 9th at such a hard tournament like SSC is amazing.
Well, I am subscribed to MVG Gaming(smash conference tournament series that Ryo used to attend basically daily however they moved south and now he can't go as often) and he actually used Ike quite often in that, however he has lost to people clearly worse than him multiple times like Rogue Penguin. Smash Con was his best placing in awhile, and that was mainly corrin. I am still doing a bit of looking, but he did use Ike in one of th sets he lost in CEO. He best placing at a big tournament with Ike was MLG where he got 7th and with corrin he got 9th at SSC. While the numbers say he got better results with Ike, tournament wise SSC was on a new level when compared to MLG. Honestly I don't know where this went, but i was trying to show that his results didn't worsen at all, and many would consider it better.He's far from the only one, never claimed he was.
However, he's one of two Ike mains that went from Ike to Corrin. He's the one who's overall results have dropped since then (want to stress as far as I know, I don't know if like he took an extended break during that period as well or what not. But he has not been showing up as much as he used to, which is different from not showing up at all). If when he goes back to pure Ike his results jump back up, that's at a minimum very interesting data particularly since he doesn't travel as much/as far as some larger names do, so his opponents are more consistent in terms of who he's facing.
Data is data, and this is frankly one of the few times where we can potentially compare two characters with very minimal difference in outside variables (Ryo is very familiar with both characters and has proven to have the ability to place well with both at at least some point in the past, minimal travel range means he's facing the same opponents so that's less of a variable on his results). If there's no real different when he makes the switch, then there's no real difference (thus Ike and Corrin are possibly closer to the same level in terms of characters strength). If his results go up, that potentially says something. (Evidence to support that the gap between the two is even smaller than in the case of no real difference, would need further evidence to draw greater conclusions than that). If his results drop, that also potentially says something. (Gap between Ike and Corrin is large than expected). I'm expecting either roughly the same, or slightly improved results.
Really, any time this situation happens with two particular characters (Player goes back to his old main after an extended break and isn't traveling much beyond their usual scope), its worth particularly watching.
-1 Zard really just does not have the juice to be a mid tier. Little amount of notable results and his awful disadvantage state are always going to keep him from relevancy, along with a lack of reward compared to other heavies.
-1 Mid's a better place for him. He's annoying but not good.
-1 After Nasubi dropping him, I can safely say he's dropping slower to low tier as the meta progresses.
-1 Like R.O.B., annoying but not good.
+1 Too low for where she is rn.
Gonna change up my votes overall.Changing my Zard downvote to this:
-
Making my last vote: -+ Once again: better than ever single character in the tier below him, better than a few in his current tier. San did just as well at TBH recently as he's always done a majors: proof that Ike as a character has not dropped in relative power from before. On top of that, Ryo announced he was going to go back to pure Ike for a while. He's in the correct tier.
-I'll maintain my position of "Corrin is at the top of the tier below". If Ryo's results spike back up after he goes pure Ike again however, I'll consider it fairly solid proof that Corrin is even lower than that. (As far as I have seen, Ryo's results have suffered since picking up Corrin seriously.)
-
-
Holding onto the last vote again