Smash Wii U & 3DS director Masahiro Sakurai says "Pic of the day. A size comparison of Lucario's standard special attack, Aura Sphere, in its weakest and strongest states. The attack is faster and more powerful when the Aura Sphere is bigger."
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I just vomit a little.Looks like they've been taking lessons from P:M.
That made my day.I know the Lucario mains are gonna appreciate the buff to his balls.
Project:M for smash 4!Project M or coincidence?
The answer is yes
Man.....imagine Villager catching that with his net!!!
Are you mad?I just vomit a little.
Well if anything, this has split the community even moreAre you mad?
I don't mean that like angry mad, but like crazy mad. . . well, I guess it could be either, or both.
I hope that Applejack means you're joking, Project: Melee is supposed to bring our community together, why drive it apart with such derision?
I doubt this, sir. And if you were referring to my comment, I must say that I was being absolutely serious, I do not mean to ridicule Rose at all.Well if anything, this has split the community even more
That's the thing though, this is only a place for melee players. Where are the brawl players supposed to go with Project M almost seemingly being the end of Brawl itself. People talk of one unit and sticking together but this doesn't apply to the Brawl players when our game is used as nothing more than a base for a MOD that the melee players createdI doubt this, sir. And if you were referring to my comment, I must say that I was being absolutely serious, I do not mean to ridicule Rose at all.
I have been to Ken's streams hearing him preach about the almighty "One unit", and I have personally in the past experienced the unification that Project: Melee has brought to the people about me. In my personal experience, I've seen more people brought together over P:M, I am simply confounded to think that there are those who would revile it. 'Tis as silly as the man who likes Hersheys hating Lindts, the matter is trivial, not of grave importance.
I want us all to be Brothers at the table of Smash, is that too much to ask?
Who is arguing?Stop arguing about Project M people. Let the Project M fans play P:M and let the Brawl fans play Brawl.
On another note, am I the only one who doesn't think that this looks like Shadow Ball?
If anything it was further differed from Shadow Ball since Brawl.
I wouldn't say that, man has never really stood eye to eye on anythingAt some point, it does become superficial. In fact I'd already say it is superficial, that all dividing lines are arbitrary and manufactured. Take, for example, the person who likes his bran flakes with blueberries, and the other who likes it with strawberries. If they're both of a hot-headed disposition, obviously they would find it in themselves to take this exceedingly trivial thing and create conflict from it. Rather than saying #OneUnit is a myth, I'd say that it is the default state of man, and that all such divisions are dumb, trivial, and silly.
Man is blank as he is created, his first sense-experience is put through the gamut of mind, soul, and intellect, and qualities of things are apprehended readily with quite a few common things for first qualities we know. If you're not willing to buy a philosophical explanation, Charles Darwin says near the closing of his Theory of Evolution, the band that was the most cooperative, that was the most at peace with eachother, would obviously succeed far greater than the selfish one, the natural state of man would seem peace then, don't you think? It is far within our mutual benefit, the rational creatures that we are. I think such cynicism is unwarranted, regardless of what experience may tell us. The assertion that division is trivial still stands regardless of the previous explanations. Since you are not at peace with what the community and others have done to disregard your game, it is ultimately your fault that you are not at peace with their decisions to favor your chosen game, not theirs for simply choosing the alternatives. That last sentence was pretty redundant, but you make your attitude, not others. I refuse to accept otherwise.I wouldn't say that, man has never really stood eye to eye on anything
Dude ok PM is the best now shut the **** up pleaseMan is blank as he is created, his first sense-experience is put through the gamut of mind, soul, and intellect, and qualities of things are apprehended readily with quite a few common things for first qualities we know. If you're not willing to buy a philosophical explanation, Charles Darwin says near the closing of his Theory of Evolution, the band that was the most cooperative, that was the most at peace with eachother, would obviously succeed far greater than the selfish one, the natural state of man would seem peace then, don't you think? It is far within our mutual benefit, the rational creatures that we are. I think such cynicism is unwarranted, regardless of what experience may tell us. The assertion that division is trivial still stands regardless of the previous explanations. Since you are not at peace with what the community and others have done to disregard your game, it is ultimately your fault that you are not at peace with their decisions to favor your chosen game, not theirs for simply choosing the alternatives. That last sentence was pretty redundant, but you make your attitude, not others. I refuse to accept otherwise.
. . . What?Dude ok PM is the best now shut the **** up please
Wrong, your conclusion does not even validly follow from your premises. If a band survives by cooperation, all that proves is that "natural state of man" within the band is peace. It says nothing of what will happens when one band's interests collide with others - as they frequently do in nature, and sometimes do within this community. That's where the tension that you consider unnatural occurs oh-so-naturally....Charles Darwin says near the closing of his Theory of Evolution, the band that was the most cooperative, that was the most at peace with eachother, would obviously succeed far greater than the selfish one, the natural state of man would seem peace then, don't you think?
What are you talking about, a lot of what you just said didn't need to be said. I am happy with my game so I have no idea where the "Since you are not at peace with what the community and others have done to disregard your game, it is ultimately your fault that you are not at peace with their decisions to favor your chosen game" came from. While you have your way of thinking, history shows that what you said is wrong in ways. I mean Darwin refused to believe or listen to what others said and that's what got him his way of thinking. My community is at peace but is constantly being picked on by melee fans because the game isn't what they want it to beMan is blank as he is created, his first sense-experience is put through the gamut of mind, soul, and intellect, and qualities of things are apprehended readily with quite a few common things for first qualities we know. If you're not willing to buy a philosophical explanation, Charles Darwin says near the closing of his Theory of Evolution, the band that was the most cooperative, that was the most at peace with eachother, would obviously succeed far greater than the selfish one, the natural state of man would seem peace then, don't you think? It is far within our mutual benefit, the rational creatures that we are. I think such cynicism is unwarranted, regardless of what experience may tell us. The assertion that division is trivial still stands regardless of the previous explanations. Since you are not at peace with what the community and others have done to disregard your game, it is ultimately your fault that you are not at peace with their decisions to favor your chosen game, not theirs for simply choosing the alternatives. That last sentence was pretty redundant, but you make your attitude, not others. I refuse to accept otherwise.
It looks a little bigger, but not by muchThe aura sphere really hasn't changed much from Brawl, size wise anyways.
(pic via user FlynnCL)
He not only has big balls but he wants to grab your balls as well.Oh I've got big balls
I've got big balls
And they're such big balls
Dirty big balls
And he's got big balls
And she's got big balls
But we've got the biggest balls of them all