Um, it's still a videogame... Just because you don't technically play it doesn't make it not a video gameYou don't "play" it. It isn't for entertainment purposes. Not a game.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Um, it's still a videogame... Just because you don't technically play it doesn't make it not a video gameYou don't "play" it. It isn't for entertainment purposes. Not a game.
It kinda does...Um, it's still a videogame... Just because you don't technically play it doesn't make it not a video game
No, you're making up false rules for what makes something a videogame. It was made by a video game company, played on a video game system, and you buy it at video game stores. It's a video game.It kinda does...
It's a fitness tool. That's all it is.No, you're making up false rules for what makes something a videogame. It was made by a video game company, played on a video game system, and you buy it at video game stores. It's a video game.
Yeah, but did you REALLY think that the main villain of Legend of Zelda would be replaced by him?That's offensive
"Wii Fit - Game Only by Nintendo of America" - gamestop.comIt's a fitness tool. That's all it is.
Wanting to replace the recurring wielder of the Triforce of Power with a most likely one-off character is offensive.He has a sword, that says enough
That's offensive
That's cool and all, but people don't play it to have fun. That, for me, is enough for it not to be a game."Wii Fit - Game Only by Nintendo of America" - gamestop.com
"Wii Fit Game with Balance Board" - Amazon.com
"By playing Wii Fit Plus a little every day, you, your friends, and your family can work towards personal goals of better health and fitness." - wiifit.com
"Wii Fit (Wiiフィット Wī Fitto?) is a video game designed by Nintendo's Hiroshi Matsunaga[4] for the Wii home video game console.[5] It is an exercise game consisting of activities using the Wii Balance Board peripheral." - wikipedia.com
This shows clearly that Wii Fit is indeed a game. You can look all these up yourself and find these exact quotes. You may not consider it a video game, but you are not the one who decides what constitutes a video game. Nintendo released it as a video game on the Wii console, which plays video games. If you cannot see the truth then that is your choice, but I thought showing you clear proof would help.
I will not participate further but I would ask you consider that this topic is also not for you to debate whether or not Wii Fit is a game. I believe there is a general discussion where you can go argue about it instead.
It's still a video game, regardless if you have fun while playing itThat's cool and all, but people don't play it to have fun. That, for me, is enough for it not to be a game.
You're forgetting Pig Ganon and Vaati.All I wanted was a cool Zelda newcomer. That's all.
One that doesn't suck (Zelda, Ganondorf) and isn't a clone (Link, Toon Link, Ganondorf).
Skull Kid would have been cool, I thought. Oh, he's an assist trophy? OK, there's still Tingle, right? Oh, he's an assist trophy too? Well Ghirahim would be pretty cool... assist trophy? ;_;
Now all we have left is Impa, and I don't even like her.
I agree with you about Toon Link's wasted potential, but he was going to happen.It's annoying that Toon Link (or Lucina [Sakurai said she fights like Marth, so until I see otherwise, she's Marth in a skirt], or Dr. Mario, or Falco, etc) get playable slots with near identical movesets over and over, while characters with real true potential for original movesets like Midna (or Ghirahim, or Kyrstal, etc) are shoved aside into the AT category (or worse, actual trophies.)
I've always had a distaste for clones, even Luigi back in Smash 64. But they changed Luigi enough in Melee that he wasn't a green Mario anymore. Luigi (and Wolf) are clones done right; similar enough to the original that they hold true to the source, while differing enough to be their own character. N64 Luigi can't say that, Dr. Mario, Roy, and Melee Ganondorf can't say that. It's okay for them to be a clone for a one-time appearance, as long as they leave or evolve after that. But Toon Link has not changed since Melee (Young Link = Toon Link, deal with it) and that annoys the hell out of me. Evolve them to not be just a copy/paste palette swap of the original with one or two stats tweaks.
If they weren't such direct clones, there wouldn't be a problem with their inclusion.
Just my little rant on the subject.
Dark Samus is a thing? Sounds like alt. costume potential..... ****. First Dark Samus, now Girahim. Maybe we'll (finally) get a new moveset for Ganondorf?
So.... You decide who gets in the roster and you know for SURE that impa is not in just because she isn't 'a consistent character'?Zelda will not have newcomers, period. DON'T YOU PEOPLE DARE bringing up "but Mario and Pokemon have newcomers" argument. About Impa, the Impa you talk about has the same amount of game appearances as Girahim. It's always different Impas and most are old ladies that tell Link some destiny BS or the plot. Impa is not consistent in character. Link is, Zelda for the most part is, and Ganon has always been the same guy. Zelda, like Mario, already has the most important characters in the series, nobody is needed, and Zelda doesn't need to feed of it's own ego like Mario and Pokemon do. Sheik and Toon Link are just extras. Sheik only has popularity thanks to Melee and the gender debate, and Toon Link because Wind Waker and Hourglass.
HI SHIEK, NESS, ROY, ICE CLIMBERS, AND LUCAS FANCY SEEING YOU HERE.People seriously thought he was going to be playable? He's only relevant to one game and a spin-off.
Pokemon LeagueWHAT IS THAT STAGE THOUGH???
Sheik is Zelda, Ice Climbers are there to represent the NES days and are also the stars of their sole game, Fire Emblem and Earthbound are series whose casts change by game with very few recurring characters and most are minor anyway.HI SHIEK, NESS, ROY, ICE CLIMBERS, AND LUCAS FANCY SEEING YOU HERE.
But seriously that arguement died a long time ago.
I'll admit, I sound foolish, maybe Sakurai will prove me wrong on my speculation, but as the things are going I think Zelda will have no new reps, and I don't mind if a new one gets in, but the core characters of the Zelda series are already in. Just saying, and you are right on your statement.So.... You decide who gets in the roster and you know for SURE that imp aid not in just because she isn't 'a consistent character'?
You sound foolish. Nobody knows the roster.
...Fixed.Zelda will not have newcomers, period. DON'T YOU PEOPLE DARE bringing up "but Mario and Pokemon have newcomers" argument. About Impa, the Impa you talk about has the same amount of game appearances as Girahim. It's always different Impas and most are old ladies that tell Link some destiny BS or the plot. Impa is not consistent in character. Link is, Zelda for the most part is, and Ganon has always been the same guy. Zelda, like Mario, already has the most important characters in the series, nobody is needed, and Zelda doesn't need to feed of it's own ego like Mario and Pokemon do. Sheik and Toon Link are just extras. Sheik only has popularity thanks to Melee and the gender debate, and Toon Link because Wind Waker and Hourglass And Four Swords, and Four Swords Adventure, and Minish Cap.
Midna...All I wanted was a cool Zelda newcomer. That's all.
One that doesn't suck (Zelda, Ganondorf) and isn't a clone (Link, Toon Link, Ganondorf).
Skull Kid would have been cool, I thought. Oh, he's an assist trophy? OK, there's still Tingle, right? Oh, he's an assist trophy too? Well Ghirahim would be pretty cool... assist trophy? ;_;
Now all we have left is Impa, and I don't even like her.
NOOOOOOOOOOO
OMG.
What will all the gay smashers do. OMG NO!!!!!!!!
I mean we still have Princess Peach.
But WE HAD TO HAVE GIRAHIM.
LIKE OMG. What will silly kyle, SlayerZ, and all the other competitive gay smashers do.
OH OH~ I'm gonna faint.
OH GIRAHIM. Maybe in the next smash we will have hot gay tongue sex.
jajaja Funny.![]()
I suppose I''ll get my chance... another day... *dies*
Even if Shiek is Zelda, she only takes her Shiek form in one game in the Zelda series, soon to be twice.Sheik is Zelda, Ice Climbers are there to represent the NES days and are also the stars of their sole game, Fire Emblem and Earthbound are series whose casts change by game with very few recurring characters and most are minor anyway.
Ghirahim, on the other hand, though from a series whose supporting cast changes per game, always mantains its main cast: Link, Zelda and Ganondorf (most of the time), everyone else have little importance to the series in general.
Ok, NOW YOU SEE MY POINTdo you hear of what you're saying? smash 64 was release in 1999 banjo and conkers ips were bought in september 2002 around and between that time keeping characters who were already planned to be given to a company wouldn't make since at all
I already know that all Links and Zeldas are different, but it doesn't matter because all of their incarnations have similar character. All Links look and act the same, all Zeldas have slight differences but are basically the same character. Zelda doesn't need characters, they can have new characters, sure, but its character lineup is perfect until as it is if you include Ganondorf. Everybody added after them feels like an extra, but they can be in. And because all the potential new Zelda characters are being axed....Let's wait til September 13 to see what happens....Fixed.
Though Melee might of been Sheik's intro into the fighting game world, she really has been around because she ALSO is the holder of the Triforce of Wisdom. It is debatle if we really need TWO Wisdom holders (Zelda and Shiek) just as much so as it is we really need to Courage holders (Link and Toon Link) but saying "lol your pokemon/Mario argument is invalid", especially with out reasoning, kinda makes your argument invalid.
If we want to be technical, Zelda isn't in every LoZ game, and NO main character of LoZ is ever featured in more than 3 games because of the whole "lol Multiple Timelines" and reincarnation thing. SS Zelda isn't OoT Zelda. TP Link isn't Oracle of Ages Link. Possible the only character that might actually be the same throughout the series is Ganondorf because he forever gets sealed away and resurrected.
and stupidWanting to replace the recurring wielder of the Triforce of Power with a most likely one-off character is offensive.
what about ganondorfs final smash come on it will be beast/pig ganon so pig ganon might just be a pipe dreamYou're forgetting Pig Ganon and Vaati.
Pig Ganon is completely different from Beast Ganon.and stupid
what about ganondorfs final smash come on it will be beast/pig ganon so pig ganon might just be a pipe dream
I swear, if they cut Ganon from this game...Impa & Ganondorf are the only Zelda characters worth adding into Smash, since they had multiple appearances in the series in some form (Ganondorf originally started out as Ganon before the timeline was implemented and Impa has multiple different versions of herself, to be honest Impa should have replaced Sheik since she's only appeared in 1 Zelda game, being OoT and it's 3DS remake), again if Ganondorf gets cut, it's going to end up just like what happened when Mewtwo got axed in Brawl and it'll be worse since Ganondorf is on the levels of Bowser in terms of villain ranking.