Here
It's really dubious, so I wonder what Leak Review heard that makes them think it's legitimate.
I mean, he said pretty specifically in his Twitter thread thing that he had sources who also claimed that Isaac was delayed from the September direct.
Problems I have with the 4chan "Nintendo Life" guy:
1) Just saying to the world "I work at _______" is usually a sure fire sign it's an impersonator. Also, working at Nintendo Life and knowing that a character is leak bait don't really correlate.
2) Such intimate knowledge of a Direct is uncommon. Knowing all five of those characters, specifically, will be in a Direct,
for sure on the 8th, again specifically, isn't usually how these leaks go.
3) "To confirm, I have the same source PapaGenos has. They have seen the banner characters, and so have I." That's a really bizarre statement. How do you know your sources are also another leaker's sources, and followup: why does it matter, unless you're trying to make your post relevant by name dropping someone else? If *you've* seen them, why does it matter if your sources have? Wouldn't you just lead with, "I've personally seen them, the banner's real"?
Either the person constructed his thoughts extremely poorly or he's faking. I'm not buying it.