TheSmasher916
Smash Journeyman
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2013
- Messages
- 257
For God's sake we need this direct already, the community is getting way too heated over something that will be proven/disproved concretley within a couple weeks tops... I do have some thoughts on recent developments though.I
Firstly, I do think we need to treat these "insiders" or whatever you'd like to call them with respect, and the lashing out seen thus far can get repulsive. These people at the end of the day are just trying to give us information to the best of their ability without outing anyone. However I also don't necessarily blame some people for getting a bit annoyed by some who claim fake and provide no backing whatsoever. If there is a reason that you can't say anything for official/legal reasons then that's one thing, but don't come out on such a controversial topic with conclusive opinions and not provide backing or counterarguments. If there is a reason, then just stay a neutral party to the best of your ability and/or provide context and reasoning to your speculation to fit in with the rest of us. Again, I still find that directly attacking these people is far too extreme for something as trivial as videogame rumors, but there are two sides to everything.
Now as for my opinions on the recent stuff with the leak itself.
Boy, never thought I'd say I miss arguing over furniture...
Firstly, I do think we need to treat these "insiders" or whatever you'd like to call them with respect, and the lashing out seen thus far can get repulsive. These people at the end of the day are just trying to give us information to the best of their ability without outing anyone. However I also don't necessarily blame some people for getting a bit annoyed by some who claim fake and provide no backing whatsoever. If there is a reason that you can't say anything for official/legal reasons then that's one thing, but don't come out on such a controversial topic with conclusive opinions and not provide backing or counterarguments. If there is a reason, then just stay a neutral party to the best of your ability and/or provide context and reasoning to your speculation to fit in with the rest of us. Again, I still find that directly attacking these people is far too extreme for something as trivial as videogame rumors, but there are two sides to everything.
Now as for my opinions on the recent stuff with the leak itself.
- I think the current company's lack of statement and deletion of the video is very telling. There's no reason they shouldn't be able to say something like Marina did if it is indeed fake, and that video wasn't even uploaded by them, so they had to go request a different company to do it. That part does add a bunch of credibility in my eyes.
- GameXplain's silence is... shocking to say the least. They are THE place to go for Nintendo coverage, and usually go over even the most seemingly insignificant pieces of news. Even in regards to Smash, they had whole discussions and analyses about the ESRB leak, and with this game covered box theory, blog theory, and other miscellaneous rumors, yet they have uploaded under 6 minutes of coverage of this thing, a channel normally notorious of overanalyzing things way beyond expectations. It's strange. The videos themselves have been almost entirely dismissive of the leaks, even having the title and first lines of the initial video boldly claiming they were fake. Its especially strange to see this from a usually objective source, and their activity elsewhere online has been seemingly shying away from it. They even removed the viewer question segment from the most recent edition to their stream that always features this segment. Next week they are going to "hand-pick" some of this week's questions to answer. How much money says not one of them will be related to the leak? It's just suspicious to me, that's all.
- The new banner cropping stuff I don't really know enough about to take a stance. I thought I saw something about it being a version of the banner for the loop or something but I'm not too sure. I do think it is a bit out there to look at the single green pixel as evidence for Isaac, especially when the same people condemn others for critiquing the background, but who knows, I think we came full circle with all of that.
- While I do respect anyone who is somewhat reputable and claims to have sources (Vergeben, Mystic, PapaGenos, etc.), I feel like nothing is really gonna be gained when there's no concrete way to determine what sources are truthful or not, and is much less of a productive means of speculation than analyzing aspects of the leak itself. The image, company, story, and other info that could support/detract from the characters showcased is much more valuable and concrete than what any individual without any REAL evidence says, one way or another. The only thing we've seen from insiders that seems VERY consistent is Incineroar, which leads me to three possible outcomes (or the most plausible ones anyways).
- The leak is fake and Incineroar is in. The answer that requires least explanation, is definitely plausible.
- Its real, and Incineroar is, or is part of the bait that Bamco talked about releasing. This is what I'm subscribing to for the time being. It's weird to me that there are so many characters thrown around that not many can agree on, yet the one thing that just about every insider agrees upon is Incineroar. Bamco confirmed that they put false information out there to weed out the leakers, and given how many sources corroborate this, it seems like the most plausible answer given the circumstances. This also seems to be one of the main reasons that many insiders doubt the leak. Primarily or solely on Incineroar's abscence (which in and of itself is ballsy of the leaker to do given how likely and rumored Incineroar seems, if it is fake). It just seems fishy to me.
- Incineroar was originally in, but talks around E3 with MS gave Sakurai the ability to add Banjo in the base roster, so priority was shifted to add Banjo, and Incineroar was (most likely) moved to DLC. I don't usually subscribe to theories of this magnitude, but there is at least some evidence to support it. PapaGenos most recent video explains it more in detail, so would direct you there for more information.
Boy, never thought I'd say I miss arguing over furniture...