Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
AhPeoples are discrediting you because you don't believe the banner leak is true.
Maybe people will start believing Box Theory now that it includes the characters they want.It's kinda funny.
If you add Incineroar to the banner that'd be 8 characters.
Now, if you take the box theory, but spin it around so that the original 8 are on the back of the box, you could fit this roster in there.
Box theory confirmed. Just not the one we thought.
I'm not being remotely serious with this
What does it accomplish? It throws people off the trail of other characters and makes people automatically skeptical of leaks not involving Incineroar. Look at how big of a ****show Incineroar not being in the Grinch leak has caused. That's exactly what Nintendo wants.
The misinformation campaign idea makes no sense whatsoever.No, Incineroar is not leaker bait. The point of leaker bait is to catch leakers. It's in the name, bait. Why would Nintendo go and tell every insider's source that Incineroar is in the game when he isn't? The idea of it being a misinformation campaign is plausible, but what does that accomplish? Nintendo isn't able to pinpoint who's saying what if they tell everyone the same misinformation. It'd make more sense if we heard multiple Pokémon, but instead it's just Incineroar. I also doubt Nintendo would start a misinformation campaign right now in an attempt at damage control. They've proven to just ignore actual leaks, so why would they act so differently this time? And before you say "but Smash is special" and "they're handling leaks differently this time," we have no proof of that other than what boils down to PR statements. Even then, aspects of the E3 reveal got leaked even when Sakurai said they didn't, so their "leak protection" isn't as great as they say it is.
Maybe people will finally realize it's a useless theory to begin with without knowing what's on the back.Maybe people will start believing Box Theory now that it includes the characters they want.
Do you know for a fact that there's a pokemon character coming? If you can tell me that? (Sorry I haven't read the last few pages). But I remember you from Brawl and some other Pokemon games, you have a very credible leak history among Pokemon chars and games. (You are the owner of Serebii.net I asume, lol).Wait, why am I being discredited?
Don't worry now that you've shown up people will disbelieve the Grinch leak for the next 30 mins or so.
This is beyond interesting.There was a problem fetching the tweet
People missed this but it's the most interesting part and Something to note.
The fact that he go out of his way to say "three Characters excluding DLC" makes me think that it's the rumors that Spawn-Wave known.
Three Characters base roster with the DLC being revealed at the VGA. He also says that DLC plan for all of 2019 is a given from his source.
Not really. That's the whole point, to create misinformation and confusion so nobody truly knows who's in the game, but they think they do. Half the reason people are so confused right now and lots of insiders are denying the grinch leak is because Incineroar is nowhere to be found.The misinformation campaign idea makes no sense whatsoever.
The fundamental issue here is the assumption that there are multiple sources running around simply because there are multiple people claiming to have heard he's in. Person A tells persons B and C, person B tells person C, now person C thinks they've heard it from two sources, when in reality they've only heard it from one.No, Incineroar is not leaker bait. The point of leaker bait is to catch leakers. It's in the name, bait. Why would Nintendo go and tell every insider's source that Incineroar is in the game when he isn't? The idea of it being a misinformation campaign is plausible, but what does that accomplish? Nintendo isn't able to pinpoint who's saying what if they tell everyone the same misinformation.
my source came to me with this info and i trust their credibility because of who they are.So papagenos : Just so I have it clear. Someone who you know is the real self and a trustworthy person told you that they know for a fact Banjo is in and that they also hear these other exact 6 + Incineroar?
That second image is a photoshopped comparison of the smash image on top of this image:apparently the item is from Tret. It is a tree turning humans into plants.
Smash -
View attachment 172237
Golden Sun -
View attachment 172238
I'd argue it has far more personality than a PS4. Still sold a ****ton less.The problem with the WiiU was that it didnt had any personality, later on Nintendo made some gems for it but it was just an experimental console.
This right here is what kills me about FE hate.Well, I mean that's the most common argument as to why people shouldn't want a Fire Emblem character. It and of itself is mostly an "ad hominem" deal where it's not really wrong to want it or even expect it. But, thing is, Pokémon just got 3 characters back. Pichu is at least only arguably worthwhile, but good luck trying to disprove the worth of Squirtle and Ivysaur. That is more than most series got, even with newcomers, and what some up-and-coming series have.
It's probably not truly greedy as in "you don't need this, shut up" as much as it is "we're kinda just used to it, so the idea of the status quo being shaken up doesn't appear to me" tier. After all, wanting in a THIRD SEGA series? Who am I to judge on that level?
Well, Hideo Kojima insisted Sakurai to put Snake in Smash Bros. Melee, but he couldn't because of time constraints. If the leak is true, I do believe Incineroar is DLC, a later addition.my source came to me with this info and i trust their credibility because of who they are.
cant give out info too much but ill say: they approached me, id never spoken to them before. they have credentials/its who they are that makes them trustable. basically if i told you, i assume most would probably be on board with trusting them too.
i have some "power" here as they trusted me not to just "out" who they are, which of course i could have always done (i absolutely wont but just pointing that out here, they put themselves on the line telling me info).
Also I was approached a while back by another source about the "spirits act like stickers" thing and that source told me something that isnt public knowledge (not anything to do with smash the game in particular) this new source also mentioned this same thing to me and they had no idea i already knew about it so i REALLY doubt this is a lie considering that consistency. I'm sorry thats really vague but i cant say more than that but it is another piece here that makes me believe/trust them (though i would based solely on who they are anyway). They are also absolutely not the same person (some one pretending to be etc..) as my first source, thats an impossibility, just figured id get that out of the way.
i have seen no proof from them of anything in the game and its my source who has a microsoft source so there is a chain here.
my source and the microsoft source believe the banner leak but are confused why incineroar isnt there... so SOMETHING might be going on, but because they had already heard these banner characters AND the microsoft source was sure of banjo before all this, they are believing this is real.
again I'd say its at the very least not a typical "fake leak", something is indeed going on here.
Maybe Incineroar is so forgettable they initially printed the poster without him in it. This guy got one of the misprints.So papagenos : Just so I have it clear. Someone who you know is the real self and a trustworthy person told you that they know for a fact Banjo is in and that they also hear these other exact 6 + Incineroar?
That was just a lucky guess, his DLC list was fake.After all, didn’t one of the ESRB leakers say they decided one of the Mother kids would’ve been DLC, while one would be on base?
Well that is what seemed to give Vergeben pause before he would name Incineroar specifically.Now, I've waffled back and forth on whether I think "leaker bait" is even something they'd bother with (my current belief is that they wouldn't), but if they would, I think a Pokemon makes a lot of sense for that character, because there's a certain expectation that a Pokemon will be in, but it could be one of dozens of options. They're all believable and wouldn't give a leaker much pause. In the event Incineroar is bait, there would likely be another group with Decidueye, another group with Lycanroc, etc.
I’m not talking about the mother-****ing leaker, I’m talking about the guy who was crossing out some of the characters on the original pics.That was just a lucky guess, his DLC list was fake.
my source came to me with this info and i trust their credibility because of who they are.
cant give out info too much but ill say: they approached me, id never spoken to them before. they have credentials/its who they are that makes them trustable. basically if i told you, i assume most would probably be on board with trusting them too.
i have some "power" here as they trusted me not to just "out" who they are, which of course i could have always done (i absolutely wont but just pointing that out here, they put themselves on the line telling me info).
Also I was approached a while back by another source about the "spirits act like stickers" thing and that source told me something that isnt public knowledge (not anything to do with smash the game in particular) this new source also mentioned this same thing to me and they had no idea i already knew about it so i REALLY doubt this is a lie considering that consistency. I'm sorry thats really vague but i cant say more than that but it is another piece here that makes me believe/trust them (though i would based solely on who they are anyway). They are also absolutely not the same person (some one pretending to be etc..) as my first source, thats an impossibility, just figured id get that out of the way.
i have seen no proof from them of anything in the game and its my source who has a microsoft source so there is a chain here.
my source and the microsoft source believe the banner leak but are confused why incineroar isnt there... so SOMETHING might be going on, but because they had already heard these banner characters AND the microsoft source was sure of banjo before all this, they are believing this is real.
again I'd say its at the very least not a typical "fake leak", something is indeed going on here.
Its not a double standard at all, almost no pokemon is the same or similar to each other (besides pichu or lucario/mewtwo with a projectile) robin is the only REALLY unique FE character (and corrin), i don't hate FE but trying to put it on the same level of pokemon ain't where it is chief.This right here is what kills me about FE hate.
A lot of people will completely get pissed if one more character is added to the roster, but are perfectly fine with four Pokémon added to one game.
Like I love Pokémon, but come on, that’s a huge double standard.
again this is assuming the leak is real, I feel like I have to put this down every time.
Typically, you know who your sources are and why they're a reliable source. What their credentials are and how they get that privileged information. I think most of these people in the know know how to separate their sources and make sure they're not just getting fed a game of telephone.The fundamental issue here is the assumption that there are multiple sources running around simply because there are multiple people claiming to have heard he's in. Person A tells persons B and C, person B tells person C, now person C thinks they've heard it from two sources, when in reality they've only heard it from one.
Not disagreeing with the point that you're making, but.Its not a double standard at all, almost no pokemon is the same or similar to each other (besides pichu or lucario/mewtwo with a projectile) robin is the only REALLY unique FE character, i don't hate FE but trying to put it on the same level of pokemon ain't where it is chief.
I can't see what this has to do with potential newcomers. By that logic, we shouldn't get a unique Zelda newcomer because only half of them are unique.Its not a double standard at all, almost no pokemon is the same or similar to each other (besides pichu or lucario/mewtwo with a projectile) robin is the only REALLY unique FE character (and corrin), i don't hate FE but trying to put it on the same level of pokemon ain't where it is chief.
I think I have a pretty good idea of how leaks work, lol.Typically, you know who your sources are and why they're a reliable source. What their credentials are and how they get that privileged information. I think most of these people in the know know how to separate their sources and make sure they're not just getting fed a game of telephone.
It's still possible, of course, but really these leakers are just journalists. The good ones hold onto their information until they can corroborate it with multiple credible sources.
lol. Well you didn't in that post I quoted.I think I have a pretty good idea of how leaks work, lol.
Banner leak*So, what're the best arguments for/against the Grinch leak?
Vaanrose, overall are you on team real or team fake?I think I have a pretty good idea of how leaks work, lol.
What? When did i say this has to do with potential newcomers? My point was that you can't compare FE reps and Pokemon reps.I can't see what this has to do with potential newcomers. By that logic, we shouldn't get a unique Zelda newcomer because only half of them are unique.
There are so many more arguments on both sides than that.Banner leak*
And for the agruements...
Those in favor is the background never seen before, characters render never seen before.
Those against it is the background that seems to be missing some things, but it was quickly countered by the fact it was changed after E3. Another thing concerning is that peoples are attempting to find renders to no luck.
You are just adorable.lol. Well you didn't in that post I quoted.
You’re going to tell me that Ike and Marth play exactly the same? Or that Robin and Corrin are even remotely similar? The only “unique” character that plays similarly to another is Roy, and even then his kit is different for a good measure.Its not a double standard at all, almost no pokemon is the same or similar to each other (besides pichu or lucario/mewtwo with a projectile) robin is the only REALLY unique FE character (and corrin), i don't hate FE but trying to put it on the same level of pokemon ain't where it is chief.
My bad, I thought the original discussion was about character additions.What? When did i say this has to do with potential newcomers? My point was that you can't compare FE reps and Pokemon reps.
Babe, you couldn't afford me.You are just adorable.
How much to adopt you?!