BluePikmin11
Akko is my dear daughter!
Is this different from the 250 slidesow we got earlier?Found a whole bunch on new screenshots! Feast you eyes on these!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/25792657@N00/sets/72157644096275264/page2/
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Is this different from the 250 slidesow we got earlier?Found a whole bunch on new screenshots! Feast you eyes on these!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/25792657@N00/sets/72157644096275264/page2/
There are two other sets that I know of (I haven't seen the 3DS press kit, a link would be nice.) How exactly are these albums "discovered"?Found a whole bunch on new screenshots! Feast you eyes on these!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/25792657@N00/sets/72157644096275264/page2/
And for some strange reason that specific thread was not archived by the auto archive.Give me a minute
I shouldn't have laughed...
Threw this on Skype with a few friends, and theyMost likely a photoshop.
Wait, you mean.Figured I'd post this here.
Figured I would respond to this here as opposed to the Character Discussion.Sorry to ruin the parade, but this is a poor attempt to take credit for the leak.
http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=f29e69054d3283c67c1a0e39edba7ac20de64881.19117
The photo shows terrible signs of tracing and photo shop attemps
Also Palutena is in the EXACT same pose, while mario is different.
Are these anywhere else? Not all the pictures are loading for meFound a whole bunch on new screenshots! Feast you eyes on these!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/25792657@N00/sets/72157644096275264/page2/
My stance is (and no offense) they're idiots.Threw this on Skype with a few friends, and theygot extremely angrysaid that
1. it's shopped and
2. apparently somebody came out like this to the greninja leak, and the fact that "anyone can come out and say it's fake" discredits this.
I for one am sure it is fake at this point, but I'd like to see your stance on these points.
Looks like a taunt
None taken,My stance is (and no offense) they're idiots.
1. They can't prove the initial leak image wasn't shopped. As I said in the post before, it's easier to hide obvious shopping when an image is deliberately blurred out in comparison to a clear, untapped original.
2. Nobody came out with a clear image that shows the invalidity of Greninja. Just tried to discredit the image with what little instances they could find. Aside from that, "anyone can come out and say it's real" discredits the initial leak image. See how bad that logic is?
This is why i do my best to not believe in leaks too much.Because I was arguing with this one person about the Palutena leak. I told her it was fake unless proven by Sakurai. And yet I was "trolling".
I was right all along.
It was locked due to constant derailment and near impossibility for the staff to manage it.Can somebody tell me what the hell happened to the Rumor Thread? O.O
Are we getting 200+ pics at the end of every week??
Figures, there some people who agree with the Sal Romano leak while many other had argued it's blasphemy. In the end, I'd rather see the full roster by the 3DS version's launch before believe any leak in the first place.It was locked due to constant derailment and near impossibility for the staff to manage it.
Only if there's a Naomi trophy involved.
Gonna be honest, it would be cool if he was in Smash Bros
That would be nice, if they were more than just the filler pics of characters in poses and actually leak a character, stage, item, or even a new mode or something substantial.Are we getting 200+ pics at the end of every week??
What? It's just a massage.Yuck..
I like how a good 2 minutes is just a black screen lmao.
Ok and that is slightly suspicious, either way though I have no doubt she is playable.Apparently the topic in /v/ was deleted earlier, so we can't provide a source.